CLASS RACER FORUM
Page 3 of 17 12 3 4513 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Rules amendments 2013 (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=44354)

69Cobra 11-14-2012 10:46 AM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
I'll be honest I like the new seat rule. I don't know about the rest of you but slipping and sliding across a bench seat grabbing gears in a 10 second 4 speed car on a track with bad traction is not my idea of fun. If I would have waited 6 months I wouldn't have had to by the factory buckets for our car. At least now I don't have to have them redone. I can just throw them up on the shelf for now and use my Kirkey's.

426Fred 11-14-2012 11:02 AM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
So does anyone not agree that the Kirkey seats would be ok to use in Stock eliminator under the new rules? Just don't want to go out and buy a set of Kirkey seats (assuming that you have to install two in place of the bench seat) only to find out that you can't use them because they don't "look" like factory seats. Just asking :)

Eric Merryfield 11-14-2012 11:16 AM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 426Fred (Post 356200)
So does anyone not agree that the Kirkey seats would be ok to use in Stock eliminator under the new rules? Just don't want to go out and buy a set of Kirkey seats (assuming that you have to install two in place of the bench seat) only to find out that you can't use them because they don't "look" like factory seats. Just asking :)
Call or email Bruce and your question will be answered once and for all....or if one of the Tech officials wants to save some time and many calls and emails they can clarify here on Classracer.

SuperCarFan 11-14-2012 12:13 PM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Zaskowski (Post 356180)
they might wanna think about correcting the part under stock where it says cylinder bores must of not exceed 0.80-inch over stock.
Saw that too and laughed...

Larry Hill 11-14-2012 12:33 PM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
There goes my 619.96 cu. in. 440 six pac engine. You know 4.320 + .80 = 5.120" bore.

C and W Racing 11-14-2012 12:47 PM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill (Post 356212)
There goes my 619.96 cu. in. 440 six pac engine. You know 4.320 + .80 = 5.120" bore.
Just buy the hard copy of the rule book and have it in your back pocket when they tear you down. Lol
Chuck

Andrew Hill 11-14-2012 12:50 PM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill (Post 356212)
There goes my 619.96 cu. in. 440 six pac engine. You know 4.320 + .80 = 5.120" bore.
I guess they're going to have to approve some 5.3" bore space billet pro mod blocks.

SPS 11-14-2012 01:04 PM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Hill (Post 356212)
There goes my 619.96 cu. in. 440 six pac engine. You know 4.320 + .80 = 5.120" bore.
Thats funny s**t, Larry.

Hopefully it doesn't take as long to resolve as the roll cage thickness fiasco.

For those that don't know ....1/8 wall tube became 118 wall.

FJ

Ken Miele 11-14-2012 01:13 PM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
Just so you all know, the rule book does have the correct numbers. It is only the 2012-2013 amendments update that has typo error.

Dave Turner 11-14-2012 02:47 PM
Re: Rules amendments 2013
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Zaskowski (Post 356180)
they might wanna think about correcting the part under stock where it says cylinder bores must of not exceed 0.80-inch over stock.
To quote my good wife; "You know what I meant"......:D


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 AM.
Page 3 of 17 12 3 4513 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.