Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
Ron, I recognize and applauded your race program... You and your program fit into Stock Eliminator because you have to race with the same set of rules that are for new, 10, 20, 30 or 40 year old race cars. If your program is go fast, you take your hit and move on. Larry Hill went very fast in a 28 year old race car (truck) and he will get a 29 horsepower gift for his efforts. That rule is the same for MOST racers in Stock Eliminator. How about putting 75 horsepower on the Shootout cars, like they earned in qualifying New cars belong in Stock Eliminator but under the same set of rules for ALL cars that race in Stock Eliminator. There is a way to fix this problem with The Factory Shootout Cars and that would be to bring back to INDY the way that qualifying used to be: Class Winners and the rest of the field filled with the fastest qualifiers with an AHFS in place.. Let them battle heads up to win class for the privilege to race in the Eliminator. If they race in Stock, they need to use Stock Rules... Bob |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
For the record I run a 1980's car. It is nice to see the automakers getting back involved in stock racing. However some of these combos are not ones that you can walk into the dealership and purchase. They are specific built race cars. I have no issue with people purchasing new cars and working on a new combo, after all we do need new cars coming into the class. However if NHRA allows the factory built cars to run in stock and take up qualifying spots then they should never be allowed to be AHFS exempt. So tell me why is it fair to let the new cars run all out with no penalty for HP. If we all run in STOCK then we should ALL follow the SAME RULES!
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
I'm like a lot of people my age or older that have raced for a lot of years. I'm just about done. If it wasn't for my son Andrew I would be done. I sold my car about a month ago, and I will mainly be Andrew's crew chief from now on. Because I have his car in Louisville and he's in Michigan I will probably race his car a few times a year, mainly at combos and one or two opens. I hope this lasts for a few more years for Andrew because he dearly loves it. I wasn't trying to start an argument with this thread but to point out how NHRA and the factories could have integrated the new cars into the sport without hurting people who have supported them for 30 or 40 years. To favor one group over another by an organization that's supposed to provide a level playing field is what really bothers me.
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
Fault me for my decision - that makes sense I did not out spend anyone - you all have more money than me - I am not trying to drive any one out - I am saying run nostalgia stock with a 40 year old car. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
If you can be happy with that, and proud of it, well, good for you. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
|
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
Yeah, I bet. I work on cars for a living, with my hands. I have ten years left on my mortgage. I drive an 11 year old truck. And I still work in my own shop, on other people's cars, 3-4 nights a week, and at least half the weekend. Yeah, I'm sure we all have more money than you. |
Re: What's wrong with Stock?
Quote:
And what sanctioning body would that be with? NHRA is wrong on this as it stands and you can't argue that. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.