Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Just an FYI, when you're looking to find out what was REALLY available on these cars, look at the B-J and Mecum cars. I'd love to hear the sellers explanation for the LD340 on his mint, super low mileage 71 Demon when he's asking 40 or 50 K for it.
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Quote:
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Weren't all those WO/RO cars 2dr hdt's, not post sedans?
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Quote:
amxron, Correct. The '67 R/W cars were hardtops only. Belvedere II, and Coronet 440's. |
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
The Chrysler contingency has the ability to get NHRA to see history through their eyes.
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Quote:
I told him then I wasn't buying it, and still don't. I like mopars a lot, having owned a bunch and raced a few. But I like the idea of keeping to the rules even more. |
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Was not my intention to open a can of worms. Anyway, had a thought. With the over the top FS cars here to stay how about an FX (factory experimental) stock class. All vintage combinations currently running in SS/AH-D combine into one 6.5 lbs/HP stock class stick/auto heads-up. Stock rules. Not sure what/how HP would be determined.
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
All you proud GM boys can look in the mirror. Your beloved NHRA allows plenty of "items" to be used when they never were available. And you know it, so quit you cherry picking. Teenage daughter is at her moms for the weekend and I don't need to hear it here. Thanks.
|
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Quote:
like the "famous" lady said, "what difference does it make" Mike |
Re: 1966 Ply Belvedere
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.