CLASS RACER FORUM
Page 4 of 4 « First 23 4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Sorenson's 1.408 under decision (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=17921)

Harry 6674 05-29-2009 09:13 AM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAY ADAM (Post 122768)
john kelly im with you. robbie shaw in my eyes must of help take weight out of the car thats why he wants it to die. sounds like a friend trying to take the heat of sorenson.there is no doubt in my mind sorenson knows somebody that was able to crush this.
WHY WONT SORENSON SPEAK UP ON THIS WEB SITE???????????

HE'S GUILTY BOTTOM LINE.
Why should they even try to explain what they were doing if anything on this site against a bunch of squirrels who weren't there and have already found them guilty? I have a real good idea the value they put on their motors and I can't believe they would drain the water than drive back to the pits unless it was real close.

s10stocker 05-29-2009 12:27 PM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Rhodes (Post 122866)
that would be solved if they all showed up at the Cajun Sports Nationals, Wesley would catch em
This would have never happened on Mr. Wesleys watch period. He may be very strict but very fair.

Mickey Whaley 05-29-2009 04:55 PM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
what if i went 1.408 under then just before the scales i took a 2 pound **** and was 1 pound under weight would it count? Or would they throw the **** on the scales with me and make it legal?

Jim Cassels 05-29-2009 05:48 PM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
Micky, you are full of it. Brandon says hi.
Jim

Ed Fernandez 05-29-2009 06:44 PM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley (Post 122915)
what if i went 1.408 under then just before the scales i took a 2 pound **** and was 1 pound under weight would it count? Or would they throw the **** on the scales with me and make it legal?
Mickey,I'd suggest you carry a doggie bag to deposit the poo and present it at the scales as ballast.You may be tossed for "loose" ballast though.
Through course of this debate am I correct that when the scales are open EVERYONE is supposed to weigh?Did Sorensen go over the scales?If he didn't isn't that a one year vacation?
Just once I'd like to see someone who is bounced get on here and admit they broke a rule.Nah it's better to play victim.

Ed F.

bigshow2966 05-29-2009 07:14 PM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
Does anyone have any solid PROOF that he drained the water? If so was it presented to the NHRA? If not, why not?

He did scale and came up light.

Ed Fernandez 05-29-2009 08:35 PM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigshow2966 (Post 122935)
Does anyone have any solid PROOF that he drained the water? If so was it presented to the NHRA? If not, why not?

He did scale and came up light.
Thank you.

Mickey Whaley 05-29-2009 09:29 PM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
Dwa

bsa633 05-30-2009 12:51 AM
Re: Sorenson's 1.408 under decision
 
If they just could come up with an explanation in wich circumstanses this 1.40 deal does apply (or dosen't) .and in what divisions...then racers would know...or would they?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:49 AM.
Page 4 of 4 « First 23 4
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.