CLASS RACER FORUM
Page 4 of 25 « First 23 4 5614 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   A case for Tru-Start (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=64335)

Mickey Whaley 11-15-2016 11:21 AM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
This will never work it will be like a soup sandwich very messy jlitfa

Don Morris 11-15-2016 11:27 AM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Stout (Post 519866)
If the slow car goes red and the fast car goes green,where is the second chance for the slow car to win. How does this get addressed? See what I did there? It's all fair for any 1 car to go green and any 1 car to go red.
Jeff,

From my understanding, under the Tru-Start system the slower car that red lights is not automatically eliminated and in fact can win the race if the faster car has a worse red light. But, when the slower car goes green and the faster car goes red, the faster car is automatically eliminated. Correct me if I am wrong.

7423 11-15-2016 11:28 AM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley (Post 519857)
get a faster car stop stirring ****
Wow............ it's
going to be a long winter.

Mickey Whaley 11-15-2016 11:43 AM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7423 (Post 519870)
Wow............ it's
going to be a long winter.
It will be Charlie cold and deep also

Billy Nees 11-15-2016 11:45 AM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley (Post 519857)
get a faster car stop stirring ****
get a slower car, grow a set

There's nothing wrong with Tru-Start! Or maybe all of this new-fangled, high-tech s**t should all get dumped and we can go back to flagmen and car-length headstarts.

Mickey Whaley 11-15-2016 11:59 AM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
[quote=Billy Nees;519872]get a slower car, grow a set

There's nothing wrong with Tru-Start! Or maybe all of this new-fangled, high-tech s**t should all get dumped and we can go back to flagmen and car-length headstarts.[/qu

Don Kennedy 11-15-2016 12:19 PM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Morris (Post 519856)
For me there is one remaining question. In the case where the slower car leaves on green, but the faster car goes red, when does the driver of the faster car get his "second chance" at winning that race? If the concern is fairness for all, how would this be addrresed?
I am against tru start

FireSale 11-15-2016 01:25 PM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
TruStart only comes into play on a double red light start. This is a rare occurrence and it addresses the current "first red light" rule with a fairer outcome. I would be OK with this.

Just to muck this up, if both cars cross the center line, should the first car over be DQ'd or the car that crosses the line by the greatest distance? Do we need hash marks crossing the track to verify this??

Last season I left last in Sportsman and first in Pro. I had red lights and 0.000 lights on each side of the equation. Makes me neutral on the fast/slow issue, which seems to be some sort of *ick measuring contest here.

RobbieRacer 11-15-2016 01:26 PM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
I am all for Tru-Start. Why should the Fast car get a "Free Pass" just cuz I went RED first. If he/she goes more red that me that's their fault.

Billy Nees 11-15-2016 01:28 PM
Re: A case for Tru-Start
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Kennedy (Post 519874)
I am against tru start
Don! You would be. You race a fast car. I'm against 2-steps, long throw switches and any slick wider than 7"!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 AM.
Page 4 of 25 « First 23 4 5614 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.