Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
Quote:
This one? Ford 302 122/137 146 150 1977 2.25% Mustang Auto Trans |
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
Quote:
|
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
Quote:
|
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
318 1980 Aspen Coupe SS/MA
318 1978 Aspen Wagon N/SA 360 1980 Dodge Ram N/SA 340 71 Demon E/SA 340/400 73 Roadrunner I/SA These are it for me at the moment My son Runs several also. |
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
Quote:
|
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
Quote:
|
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
I see on the hp adjustments they changed the hp rating on a 68 Corvette 327/325 motor. That's a mistake. They never made that combination in the Corvette. Are they talking the 327/350 stick only combo?
|
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
Quote:
|
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
Quote:
|
Re: Merry Christmas from NHRA HP adjuster
Bob,
Through all the 60 years I've been racing I have always heard the Corvette ratings were higher on like combinations because of the Stock Exhaust manifolds and the Stock Pan configuration. For the life of me I can't see how a Exhaust Manifold difference in all classes that allow aftermarket headers is even a consideration for HP variations. Now a Stocker with a Stocker pan.. I can see that there could be a difference...In Super Stock and Super Stock GT where aftermarket pans are allowed I don't see any reason to add HP to "like" engine combinations. Is NHRA Tech going back to some wheelbase considerations like in the old days with Ford and Mopar?? |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.