Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
that's your problem, you assume and think you know and where I am in points has nothing to do with header tethers. But if you must know, I'm at Numidia every points weekend except for those weekends that I am on the road with my son so he can compete at the IHRA Finals at MIR, the ECF at Bristol and the NHRA Division 1 Finals at Mason Dixon. Oh and he ain't leading the points, he's the track champion as he was last year.
Don't care what you did at your duck pond in bum f-ck, it ain't numidia dragway which boosts back to back team championships(2011 - 2012) as well the 2010 Super and 2012 Pro ET winners(same guy too, different cars) and without question home the toughest bracket racers in all of nhra division 1. Quote:
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
FS/DC Bill Skillman, Greenwood IN, '13 Mustang 8.834 |
Re: You got to be kidding?
Indy was days ago, my info was from ND as of 8/23/13 and there still ain't one that's "much faster" than my "rocket" despite costing far more than my junk but none of this has to do with collector tethers that are now required! The whiners need to get over it and pay your $!
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
Some of us find your personality disorder entertaining however |
Re: You got to be kidding?
what part of the truth and the facts don't you like?:p
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
So, anyway...back to the topic at hand, but slightly away from it...
The NHRA rulebook states that only cars equipped with an exhaust requiring a tether must adhere to the rule next year. What about motorcycles? I noticed a PSM racer lost part of it's exhaust well past half track during qualifying last week at the U.S. Nats. Just wondering. Ivan. |
Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
Scott, if required, even I will be buying a pair from you.;)
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
Yes I'm sure there is a cheaper way but all-in-all, it bites but in kit form it's probably not horrible. |
Re: You got to be kidding?
I can see where these teathers are needed on some cars, then ones where the collector is hanging off of the collector, with no other support. I think these people need teathers. When we built my car, when it came to headers and collectors, we have a clamp around the collector or muffler which bolts to the frame. Adding a teather to my car is redundant. It is not going to provide any more safety. I wonder what will happen when a collector comes off, and is teathered on a car like a super comp dragster, and now it is swinging around in the air as the car is going down the strip. All the pictures of the above, I agree need teathers, if fact I thing they need to be double teathered, to make sure they stay on. This is only two hundred dollars, but here we go again, where some one build something to be light and gain a advantage, and we all have to pay. Steve Williams S/G
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
It would seem to me that as 90% + of headers are under chassis and if a collector falls off, it pretty much just slides down the track. The obvious offender would be down swept dragster headers that exit in front of the slicks. Aren't we all being punished for a design that doesn't apply to most. Why not just specify that a tether is required if the collector protrudes out in front of the tire. Not going to win this argument but as a header fabricator who is going to have to suffer with this change, I'm thinking that this is a knee jerk response to an isolated incident.
Jim Caughlin SS 6019 |
Re: You got to be kidding?
1320 , not to bust anyone's balls my 2008 CJ ran 8.78@155 at 3510 lbs at the atco race in april 2013 . But to tell the truth Holbrooks CJ is the fastest in the country . That car can run 8.50 in east coast air at 3500lbs
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
I have never seen a collector fall off when it's held on at two different places. I had one fall off a couple of years ago when it was being he'd by one tab and the weld broke. If you mandated two different places for the collector to be held on to the header I think you would solve any problem you have.
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
|
Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
I reckon ya got it right, except for the fact that it's an insurance 'Knee jerk' reaction, I think it comes from a cry-baby law suit that they cant handle. ie , gotta pay. Let's face the facts, NHRA is broke and has been for the last 6-7 years. ( Bruce, chime in if ya want) ! What do ya do ? Ya gotta cut cost's and ya liabilities. MR. Lawyer says there is a proven case for tethers on headers cause ONE person complained and made some quick cash and that set's the precedent, game over ! |
Re: You got to be kidding?
[QUOTE=1320racer;396580]I'm no fan of scott lemen but you can't blame him for trying to make a buck. There's now a need and he's the first to offer an NHRA accepted tether. If you think you can do better, get them NHRA accepted and sell them for less, have at it.
http://www.dragraceresults.com/fulls...id=4965&type=2[/QUO This, first 6 words of post. |
Re: You got to be kidding?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.