Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Jeff, this a discussion board, right? I think we can agree on that. It is not just a discussion board; it is a discussion board dedicated to the idea that non-racers have brains, too, and CAN have good ideas, and need a place to put those ideas out for public scrutiny. Ken created this board for just such a purpose. Ask him...

I have been able to, through my many posts here that explain the reasons why I think this "worse" red light idea could be an improvement over what we have, to use this board as Ken intended it.. Why anyone would object to using this board for the betterment of our sport is beyond me.

Some say it's boring, and a waste of time. That's their opinion, and they are surely within their rights to voice it here, but I would ask, "Why would anyone continue to read something that is boring, and a waste of time?" Nobody puts a gun to anyone's head and says, "READ THIS, OR I'LL SHOOT!" When I find a TV show on my television that bores me, I switch channels. There is an abundance of other subjects that are available on Class Racer that will inform, entertain, and educate... all one needs to do is click on them; nobody has to read this thread if it bores them.

Having said that, and I don't think there's anything in that paragraph that you would disagree with, doesn't it make you wonder why there are SO MANY posts here???? Somebody likes it... Somebody thinks it's worth discussing. A lot of "somebodies," apparently.

As far as NHRA/IHRA goes, I don't run a Class car right now, and the "quality" of people that I would be talking to at the "HRA's", don't have the perspective beyond "the company line" to entertain "outside the box" ideas from non-NHRA/IHRA racers, especially (given their financial state of affairs,) ideas that are going to cost them money (no matter, how little.)

No, I am sure that the first question he'd ask would be, "What is your membership number and what is your Permanent Number," as if that information would have ANY bearing on the quality of my suggestion(s).

Only by hearing it from a variety of sources, will this idea ever gain traction, and this forum is probably the best place for dispensing the kind of logic that is part and parcel of a worse red light rule.

Popular opinion will get this rule passed, eventually, if, indeed, it ever gets passed.

Talking to an Nhra/IHRA "official," who's relegated to answering the phones, isn't going to get it done. He's likely, already afraid for his job, and suggesting to his superiors a new rule that not only, won't make the national organization one thin dime, but will COST money to implement, isn't going to "enhance" his employment status at all... especially, at a time like this

It's not the right time for that methodology, I'm afraid. Maybe it will never be.

In the meantime, demonizing someone who is trying to help enact a rule that would make things more fair for everyone, and would hurt NO ONE probably isn't the best course of action...

My 2-cents.

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Genius, I am the wrench behind Kevin Cradduck's orange and white 69 Camaro 427/425 AA/SA. We have two class wins, and an overall runner up at St. Louis, and two class wins at Bowling Green, all in AA/SA.

Not that there's really any reason for me to justify anything to or for you.

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Bill, how are you helping enact a rule? Have you contacted the Div tech people? They can tell you who to ask for, that is not afraid of loosing his job, and are nice helpful people. O got another part number Bow Tie block approved a little over a year ago. Got it approved in less that two weeks. No message board carping, just calm friendly phone calls and one letter. Painless as can be. Won't happen here. Try to approach it like an adult.

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Do you see any difference in the difficulty in getting a new part number approved and changing a 48 year-old rule that affects the way business is done on the starting line for EVERYONE... ??????????????

Apples and oranges. How much did it cost NHRA to approve that block?

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Now I see how our president got elected.Feed the mushrooms enough ***** and eventually they start believing whatever you spoon out.

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Typical Fernandez post; full of insults and impertinent information and NOT ONE WORD about the subject matter of the thread.

If you spent half as much time trying to understand the reasons why the current rule is a bad one, MAYBE you'd figure out that you're on a sinking ship...

Maybe not... You've had a lot of opportunities to figure this out, but are so busy thinking up new and clever ways to insult people, coherent thought doesn't have a chance...

Who do you think benefits from a post like that, Ed? It surely doesn't do YOUR image on this board any good.

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Image? Ed don't need no stinking image! He just wants to talk! Jim


.

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Yes, he should be petitioning NHRA, but by posting about it in this forum he's already got one convert (that is if he's not levelling.) Maybe if he gets enough people to agree with him there might be enough votes to get it changed, kind of like all the people who wanted to get rid of deep staging.


-Toby

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

Toby a cool picture of your mom . i only hope your mom and my mom are discussing racing . (tie)

Re: worst red light debate, again!
 

I insult and make fun of people who deserve it.You're a lonely old guy with nothing else to do but instigate a topic that will not affect you one bit.You're what's known in the present
world as an "advocate".That stands for meddling idiots who stick their noses into peoples lives and impact it without any consequences to themselves.If you were a current of future S/SS racer I would have engaged in a civil discussion.But you're a nosey old busy body,nothing more nothing less.