Re: HP Rating....F Body vs FWD Conversion Cars
I think the only valid would be weight the fwd car to the F body weight, then compare.
|
Re: HP Rating....F Body vs FWD Conversion Cars
Help me understand this. If a FWD Conversion has no advantage other then the small size and areodynamics, then why have I yet to see or hear of a Pontiac Soltice being built? Seriously, It's wheelbase is even shorter than the F-body, and I'm pretty sure you could fit a FI V-8 under the hood. It only weighs 100 lbs more, so what gives? Is it because you are not allowed the same modifications a FWD car has?
|
Re: HP Rating....F Body vs FWD Conversion Cars
Quote:
|
Re: HP Rating....F Body vs FWD Conversion Cars
Quote:
|
Re: HP Rating....F Body vs FWD Conversion Cars
Quote:
Does anybody own a fbody with the 350/300hp (now rated at 327) that can run anywhere close to 1.00 under? That motor took serious abuse from FWD cars, and it wont be the last one. Is it really that much more work? |
Re: HP Rating....F Body vs FWD Conversion Cars
Ask Brian McClanahan or Fogle if they could. That combo also took a beating by SS/HA and SS/GA cars too.
|
Re: HP Rating....F Body vs FWD Conversion Cars
Quote:
The third gen Camaros have to run rear control arms that are non-adjustable and bushed at both ends. There are older Cameros (leaf spring cars) that are allowed to run Alf traction bars. All the cars that are allowed to run the Calvert bars are solid heims on both ends. The new Mustangs and Camaros all have solid heims. The new Camaros even are allowed to run Ford 9 inch rear ends. What this comes down to is that NHRA has lost control of the rule book. They tell us what cars we can run and try to hand pick their winners. The future of sportsman drag racing has long been lost. IMO!!! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.