CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases?? (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=32649)

Mark Yacavone 04-10-2011 07:02 PM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Miele (Post 251918)
Mark, I didn't know you were such expert on on the rule book. I should have consulted with you before I built my car.

And since you are the expert here, can I replace my center section with an aftermarket as long as it is steel, even though there is no mention about aftermarket cases. Remember if it does not say I can, it means I can't.

Ken, No expert , that's for sure. I don't think anyone could be .
I've been around NHRA for over 40 years now, and I just have an idea how they think most of the time. I do think that they put some of the vague, ambiguous language in there just to give themselves wiggle room .

As to your question, the aftermarket steel case is close enough to OEM in weight and density, that it's considered a replacement part, similar to a Moser 12 bolt (Technically not OEM either).
I got busted at Gainesville years ago, for having a Moroso aluminum water pump on a 283 Stocker . I painted it black and all, same as the engine. I knew it wouldn't fly if it was ever spotted. I happened to have a cast iron spare in the truck, ready to go on . LOL

Ken Miele 04-10-2011 08:07 PM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
I think your forgetting the golden rule, if it does not say you can, it means you can't.

Mark, lets just say I don't agree with any of your interpretations of the rules that I mentioned, especial the one that effected me. Oh yes, that's exactly what I thought you would say, I just wanted to see you type it.

Jeff, one more time, NHRA told me it is not a performance advantage, that argument is over.

Larry Hill 04-10-2011 09:01 PM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
Bill dont forget drive by wire!

I'm going to get one of the new 8 4/4 so i can get better gear selection and rear suport on the pinion...

RJ Sledge 04-10-2011 10:30 PM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
Larry does a Mopar 8 4/4=a 9" Ford??

RJ

7423 04-10-2011 10:33 PM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
You have mentioned that you want a clarification of the rule. Who would you like to hear this from? Does NHRA employ someone who has the authority to "clarify" something in the rule book?

Phillip marvetz 04-10-2011 11:52 PM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by R J Sledge (Post 251990)
Larry does a Mopar 8 4/4=a 9" Ford??

RJ

Yes

Jeff Lee 04-11-2011 12:14 AM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Miele (Post 251946)
I think your forgetting the golden rule, if it does not say you can, it means you can't.

Mark, lets just say I don't agree with any of your interpretations of the rules that I mentioned, especial the one that effected me. Oh yes, that's exactly what I thought you would say, I just wanted to see you type it.

Jeff, one more time, NHRA told me it is not a performance advantage, that argument is over.


Really? Then why is the aluminum center section not allowed at present? Apparently somebody disagrees. Must be the "other guy" at NHRA.

Larry Hill 04-11-2011 07:47 AM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
RJ they do look the same and all the parts interchange.

RJ Sledge 04-11-2011 11:25 AM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
Larry

Thanks I believe that I'll try one of those Mopar Aluminum units in my car. They still pay don't they??

RJ

Greg Hill 04-11-2011 12:34 PM

Re: Ford and Mopar Aluminum R/E Cases??
 
This is just another time when they don't follow their own rule book.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.