CLASS RACER FORUM
Page 5 of 7 « First 34 5 67
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock Tech (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   1.28 - 60 ft (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=39237)

1320racer 03-01-2012 12:41 AM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
you continue to make statements about cars and performance you are CLUELESS about!:rolleyes:

Stick to what you know, lying to the naive and misinformed, not what you think you know.

HP HUNTER 03-01-2012 12:55 AM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320racer (Post 312309)
you continue to make statements about cars and performance you are CLUELESS about!:rolleyes:

Stick to what you know, lying to the naive and misinformed, not what you think you know.
What I know Ed is this: How to put over a 1/2 second with my oval port iron headed, production blocked 10.8 compression engine on the first full pass down the track on your red chevelle, 10.07 to 9.56. What I know Ed is this: How to win two srait Hot street championships (10 inch tire all motor 3350 pounds) and hold both ends of the record as an engine builder/machinist. Now didnt you finish second in points in the local bracket race series? :p

1320racer 03-01-2012 01:01 AM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
Nobody cares about your lies and claims, least of which is me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HP HUNTER (Post 312308)
Come on Ed, shouldnt a 4 link SS/GT car run in the teens under a no rules 522 inch aftermarket engine? Frank Grossi 8.77 peanut port 454, flattop Q-jet, 1.19 60 foot, thats just what these cars do. Just saying.......:D
My car isn't a SS/GT car, it's a footbrake launched bracket car who's engine is no comparison in design, intent and cost to a super stock engine but if you insist, my car is quicker than every national record holding super stock car EXCEPT the following... SS/AH (a hemi car), SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/AM, SS/BM, SS/CM(modified cars).

http://www.nhra.net/stats/ss_record.html

Not too shabby from where I sit and it cost a fraction of what these cars cost to build and makes many more passes and turns on more win lights each season.

HP HUNTER 03-01-2012 01:16 AM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320racer (Post 312312)
Nobody cares about your lies and claims, least of which is me.


My car isn't a SS/GT car, it's a footbrake launched bracket car who's engine is no comparison in design, intent and cost to a super stock engine but if you insist, my car is quicker than every national record holding super stock car EXCEPT the following... SS/AH (a hemi car), SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/AM, SS/BM, SS/CM(modified cars).

http://www.nhra.net/stats/ss_record.html

Not too shabby from where I sit and it cost a fraction of what these cars cost to build and makes many more passes and turns on more win lights each season.
You put a tenth on Grossi's peanut port (236), Q jet, flattop pistoned, 454 with your 522 inch big block, in negative 2000 feet air, 30.4 baro, nice work, we got a car like yours but its on a 10 inch tire, and of course its a little heavier, but its quite a bit faster, infact it turned the win light on in every race over a two year span except one, of course heads up racing isnt as competitive as bracket racing. LOL

Ed Wright 03-01-2012 08:58 AM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320racer (Post 312092)
actually this should be in bracket racing.:p
x2! Lol

HP HUNTER 03-01-2012 10:15 AM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Wright (Post 312339)
x2! Lol
Ya Ed, your the terror in J when they call for class eliminations. LOL

Mike Casteel 03-01-2012 12:34 PM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
[QUOTE=1320racer;312312]Nobody cares about your lies and claims, least of which is me.


My car isn't a SS/GT car, it's a footbrake launched bracket car who's engine is no comparison in design, intent and cost to a super stock engine but if you insist, my car is quicker than every national record holding super stock car EXCEPT the following... SS/AH (a hemi car), SS/AS, SS/BS, SS/AM, SS/BM, SS/CM(modified cars).

http://www.nhra.net/stats/ss_record.html

Not quicker than John Armstrongs SS/AA, he's been at least 8.7 if not 8.6.

Ed Wright 03-01-2012 12:50 PM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by HP HUNTER (Post 312352)
Ya Ed, your the terror in J when they call for class eliminations. LOL
I'm not the beating my chest about how blinding fast I am, nor how nobody believes how hast I am. You just are clueless about how different combinations MPH versus ET.

You & 1320 can stop all the PMs. I don't care how smart or fast you guys think you are.

James L Miller 03-01-2012 01:11 PM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Grubbs (Post 312088)
My sisters better looking than yours.
Send me a picture of your sister. I might be interested.

It looks like your thread has worked it's magic.

1320racer 03-01-2012 01:29 PM
Re: 1.28 - 60 ft
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Casteel (Post 312389)
[Not quicker than John Armstrongs SS/AA, he's been at least 8.7 if not 8.6.
FYI, I've run 8.70 in good air, not great air and I've run 5.50 in the 1/8th with a restrictor plate having 1 3/8" holes.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 AM.
Page 5 of 7 « First 34 5 67
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.