Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
Congrats to Don for being the first 8-second stocker and congrats to JDM Engineering for supplying the power. Don goes out there every week with his foot to floor and his team spent countless hours getting that car that work.
What a lot of you guys don't know is that Don got the short-end of the NHRA stick 40-something years ago when he campaigned his Chevy and got run all over by the "new" under-factored combinations. Don didn't quit or bitch, and now his name is forever in the record books. Congrats guys. |
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
Quote:
As I recall many of our mutual friends and fellow racers with 327/275 Chevies and 340/275 Mopars, and 351/285 Fords wondered the exact same thing in 1993. I often wondered how GM could pull 30 HP more out of those with only a hood change? :confused: I even asked Danny Gracia that same question. Next time we see each other I will tell you what he said. |
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
But, Alex, if the LT1 is under rated, how can the 5.9 DP be rated the same, and not be even worse? Have you looked at the specs? No way a knowledgable person could compare the two and think "Yeah, those two are the same HP". I have data from someone I trust telling me those heads go 300 CFM right out of the box. My HeadsUp! LT1 SS heads are about 40 behind.
If your talking about the LT1 versus 5.9 DP HP rating I'm sure interested in hearing that one. :-) That hood deal? Got me. I have taped the scoops up on my WS6 daily driver, it ran the same times both ways. I have dyno tested several on my old chassis dyno. If I gave you twenty dyno sheets, half ram air & half not, you could not tell me which were which. The low restriction exhaust that comes with the hood does not make as much difference as they vary car-to-car due to production tolerances and how they were broken in. |
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
Quote:
Thank you. Just goes to show that GM under rated it at least 30 HP. Ask Monte Howard, or Mike Walter who were very accomplished stocker racers in their own right how they felt about the LT-1 HP when they hit the scene. GM had their day in the S/SS sun for a long time when they were supplying NHRA with bags of cash and vehicles. |
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
Q. That 4wide track has a 1% down hill after 1/2 way? True.or False.
|
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
Quote:
Ask Tony and Spenser,,, they're not worried about saving their combinations! Danny Durham |
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
Quote:
|
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
Quote:
|
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
What's really going to be funny is when NHRA cuts the stockers back to racing a 1000' in the interest of safety or maybe even 1/8 mile racing! Just something to think about.
|
Re: Ford First "Stocker" Into The Eights
The NHRA website and even ESPN2 actually put something up about it in the middle of all the nitro/pro guys. That is some media attention for Stock Eliminator that some always complain the class lacks. The cars have brought more attention to the sport and new interest in cars being built to compete. I'm building a 2013 CJ to compete I never considered it before the CJs showed up. Because of the CJs many of my mustang friends are also looking at getting into racing here(and not just CJs to race but other models). Like them or not they are here to stay. So stop complaining on the Internet and get to work on your race car. Nothing worth doing is ever easy. If it was easy everyone would do it and you would still have the 5% that would rise to the top. This isn't only true in racing but in life. 95% of the people are just along for the ride.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.