CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   .90 Heads Up Class Racing (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=30168)

super comp 112 12-09-2010 07:22 PM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chris williams (Post 226772)
you went back to fix the spelling and still got it wrong?

i did some research and found nhra has a class for you to run ever weekend its called trophy.

SGSST109E 12-09-2010 07:48 PM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
Make all super classes a .550 pro tree. Then there would be more cars back in SG

RacingRicki 12-09-2010 10:30 PM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
I would just be happy if they gave us a real .400 tree in SG. .500 would be good too. Heavy SST cars just have too hard of a time on the current .370 (a.k.a. .400) tree. So even fast SST cars won't be able to move up to SG without spending lots of cash on chassis upgrades or getting a new car.

frank v 12-10-2010 08:48 AM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
the Federico rule.........no chassis cars in super street.

frank v 12-10-2010 08:51 AM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
i also would like to see a real .400 tree

Dave Steltz 12-10-2010 09:30 AM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by frank v (Post 226993)
the Federico rule.........no chassis cars in super street.

Well now thats funny, I dont care who ya are !!!!

Chris Williams 12-10-2010 12:05 PM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by super comp 112 (Post 226940)
i did some research and found nhra has a class for you to run every weekend it's called trophy.

My point, Einstein, is that we're ALL running trophy, all the time. The purse and contingency are just gravy.

voltdr 12-10-2010 12:20 PM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Williams (Post 227025)
My point, Einstein, is that we're ALL running trophy, all the time. The purse and contingency are just gravy.

I agree with you Chris. Years ago even David Rampy had to quit racing until he could find a sponsor to help make ends meet. I'll bet if Dan Fletcher would respond to this he would tell the same story. Both of these guys win a lot and need help to pays the bills. If you build a drag car with the idea of making money, you should sell it before you race it.
Dan Foley
SC4698

billy leber 12-10-2010 12:59 PM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TS310C (Post 226904)
I do see your point. But for those of us that already have the equipment to go 170 what are we supposed to do with it? Sell it for .50 on the dollar and by a smaller motor? I also think there are a number of racers (myself included) that like to go fast and don't want to slow down. I don't think it is near as exciting to go 140 as it is to go 170+. If I wanted to go slow I would be racing stock.

I respect your opinion,but to me , going 140 in my super stocker or 170 in my super gas car dosent feel much different after about the third run of the year. I guess this is unfortunate for me! lol

Tom Goldman 12-10-2010 02:25 PM

Re: What Changes In Super Classes Would You Like To See
 
I dont understand the bitchin about the tree.
My old car at 2750# and a 30year old 468 still had .020 to .030 in the box on a .370 tree.
They put all those holes in the 4 link and knobs on the shocks fo a reason ya know!
I have to run as much as .080 in the box at the MASGA races on a true .4 tree..and let me tell you it sucks when you have that much in ,when you miss the tree, you REALLY miss the tree!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.