CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock Tech (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Mopar 273-4bbl Combo (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=64368)

Billy Nees 12-01-2016 04:08 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SSDiv6 (Post 521225)
The LD4B Edelbrock intake was approved as a replacement for the 273 due to the fact it was available with a Chrysler part number. The same rationale used on the 440 Chrysler 6-Pack engine with the Edelbrock intake. The 6-Pack intake was available in both aluminum and cast iron.

And using that rationale, the 283s and 327s should have the Z-28 intake and the AMCs should have all of the group 19 stuff back.
Come on out and race the new and improved Stock Eliminator! The same as ET-2 only more expensive and with a lower purse!

SSDiv6 12-01-2016 05:04 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 521239)
And using that rationale, the 283s and 327s should have the Z-28 intake and the AMCs should have all of the group 19 stuff back.
Come on out and race the new and improved Stock Eliminator! The same as ET-2 only more expensive and with a lower purse!

There are already 283 engines running the approved 327 intake.
The AMC Group 19 intake and carburetor was removed because of your diligence with NHRA. You should have probably done the same with all the other bogus that has been running out there for many years.

65signet 12-01-2016 05:16 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by David Lee (Post 521168)
what size headers are you using?

1 5/8, to a 2 1/2 collector, i going to install a different collector next year.

Billy Nees 12-01-2016 05:57 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SSDiv6 (Post 521243)
There are already 283 engines running the approved 327 intake.

You should have probably done the same with all the other bogus that has been running out there for many years.

I agree, the 283 should NOT have a 327 intake on it. BUT, at least it's an iron dual-plane intake replacing another iron dual-plane intake not an aluminum high-rise dual-plane replacing an iron low-rise (at best!) single-plane intake.

I absolutely wish that I could. I won't live long enough! Wouldn't it be nice if NHRA set aside a date like January 1 2018 and "reset" all of the f**kups.

Care to start a separate thread pointing them all out?

Frank Castros 12-01-2016 08:20 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Billy,
Please do, you're the man for the job.

gmonde 12-01-2016 08:46 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SSDiv6 (Post 521225)
The LD4B Edelbrock intake was approved as a replacement for the 273 due to the fact it was available with a Chrysler part number. The same rationale used on the 440 Chrysler 6-Pack engine with the Edelbrock intake. The 6-Pack intake was available in both aluminum and cast iron.


the amc r4b had the amc part number as well,, am 4485729,,

MR DERBY CITY 12-01-2016 11:16 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 521247)
I agree, the 283 should NOT have a 327 intake on it. BUT, at least it's an iron dual-plane intake replacing another iron dual-plane intake not an aluminum high-rise dual-plane replacing an iron low-rise (at best!) single-plane intake.

I absolutely wish that I could. I won't live long enough! Wouldn't it be nice if NHRA set aside a date like January 1 2018 and "reset" all of the f**kups.

Care to start a separate thread pointing them all out?

Awesome idea billy, starting Jan 1 let's get all the bogus welfare off the cars and back home on the shelves where they belong.The cowl hood on 69 camaros.Looks as though NHRA took the initiative to correct this one, I just wonder why they stopped with the chevys and didn't correct the chryslers.

Coleydog 12-01-2016 11:41 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY (Post 521270)
Awesome idea billy, starting Jan 1 let's get all the bogus welfare off the cars and back home on the shelves where they belong.The cowl hood on 69 camaros.Looks as though NHRA took the initiative to correct this one, I just wonder why they stopped with the chevys and didn't correct the chryslers.

What hoods on Chrysler? Or correct what?

Paul Precht 12-01-2016 11:57 PM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MR DERBY CITY (Post 521270)
Awesome idea billy, starting Jan 1 let's get all the bogus welfare off the cars and back home on the shelves where they belong.The cowl hood on 69 camaros.Looks as though NHRA took the initiative to correct this one, I just wonder why they stopped with the chevys and didn't correct the chryslers.

I'm just guessing but I think maybe the Camaro racers took it upon themselves to start using that hood and the Chrysler racers have the factory's books to back them.

Dwight Southerland 12-02-2016 08:43 AM

Re: Mopar 273-4bbl Combo
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 521247)
I absolutely wish that I could. I won't live long enough! Wouldn't it be nice if NHRA set aside a date like January 1 2018 and "reset" all of the f**kups.

Care to start a separate thread pointing them all out?

You would have to set the date a lot further out than that. The issues that would have to be resolved span generations and multiple layers of egos and facts. The first issue is who makes the final decision? (No offense, Billy, but I'm not sure I would want you to be that person. You have a GM mind.) At this point, most of the errors and falsehoods have been absorbed into the system and adjusted for so that racing is reasonably stable. But, I'm still waiting for someone to build a 1970 Monte Carlo convertible.


As a well-known NHRA tech personality once told me, "If it is in the NHRA books it is legal whether it is right or not."


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.