Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
Quote:
|
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
Quote:
There is little that can be done to resurrect Pro Stock. Every rule change just costs the teams a bunch of money and does nothing to improve the class. This last rule package was a complete flop. The only thing that will help the pro classes is if the economy takes a upswing and there is more corporate sponsorship money available to fund more teams that can run competitively. They are out there but cant afford to compete at the top level. The bright spot in PS for me this year was Matt Hartford running in the top half with WJ power. I hope he sticks with it. Its sad to see our sport in such a state of decline over the past 10 years due to the poor management at NHRA and lack luster economy. |
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
Quote:
|
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
How about this idea every thing stays The same in Pro stock except they have to use a factory stock body no modifications allowed to the body same size, same look, and a Pro can use any body that the factory makes.:D only wheel wells can be stretched for the bigger tire . Simple
any year body style . To monitor this change would be simple have the factory car sitting right next to the race car . |
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
The non racer fans will lose more interest then existing Pro Stock has now. Like said before, more people leave the stands for beer/soda, hotdog and a Top Fuel T-Shirt as soon as Pro Stockers start running. :(
I would also think it would like asking the Pro drivers to take a huge step back. Like asking a Jet pilot to fly a prop plane...:eek: From the racer side this all sounds like a great class that I would enjoy watching! |
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
Honestly do not think that NHRA is ready for a legal battle with the few millionaires who are now dominating the class. Pro-Stock started to morph after Bill Jenkins introduce the first tube chassis race car. During the mid 80's to the early 90' all pro-stock cars still look like a car that we could buy at any local Dealership across North America but unfortunately someone decided to bubble up for Aerodynamics purposes to the point that they hardly even look like a car sold my any of manufacturers products in the showroom. All NHRA has to do if they're truly interested in keeping Pro-stock is to mandate that all Pro-stock cars have the same sheet metal and dimensions of cars from said Manufacturer. This would solve all problems, builders would continue to build safe and durable cars with 500 cubic inches engines, the public would be happy seeing their favorite driver compete, you would have to stop the hemorrhaging of money by outlawing crazy differentials, axles, brakes,shocks,transmission using titanium gears, and valves then you could have guys like Charlie show that hard work and ingenuity can overcome unlimited pocketbooks. I think that NHRA has their mind made up by moving to a Circus(Fields Corporation) type of entertainment. This also means that Stock/Super Stock and Competition Eliminator to be combined or totally to be eliminated making room for 9.0. 10.0.11.0 12.0 13.0 classes. NHRA has to change because the young bloods are staying away. Seriously a 9" tire isn't capable to safely hook a1000hp car now, just imagine 1500hp race car. Remember the law suit that incur after the Reher Morrison Camaro took the life Lee Sheperd, just imagine the the possible catastrophe from more of these type of events. CR.p.s prop planes are fun.lol
|
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
And here you have it Nhra simply won't listen to those in the class....
http://www.competitionplus.com/drag-...mopar-minority |
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
Quote:
http://www.nhra.net/yes/ |
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
Quote:
|
Re: Factory Cars to Pro Stock in 2018 - Speculative Web Arti
Quote:
"Johnson said Mopar wanted a Pro Stock division which resembled what many drag racing fans wanted, identifiable bodies and engines relative to today's street vehicles, with the performance of today's current Pro Stock chassis for performance and safety. Johnson said he'd heard enough to know the manufacturers would have supported this idea. "We were even going to build a test car if NHRA would have entertained it. Same chassis, same clutch, same transmission, rear end and everything. Except it would have had a Challenger body on it. It would have been the Crate Engine with a supercharger in it. "We would have modified the engine and the supercharger to the point that it made the same power we do now. That's where Mopar wanted to go, and I know Ford was for it too. I believe GM was for it as well. NHRA went with the fuel injection instead." "You would have seen a cross between the Pro Stock before the changes and the Factory Stock, but with an engine that would have cut costs tremendously. That engine would have lasted us half the dang year. The proposal was to limit modifications, so as to keep the costs down too." Thanks for posting the link Ed. I had not seen this. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.