Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
The conversion to full Stock from PS for my Impala is $15k. That is to be somewhat competitive, reliable and safe. For me it is also the time and maintenance. I love the S/SS association races. They bring the cost to fun ratio closer in line with local bracket racing. For long distances meets....couple nights at a motel ! Do not have to worry about fuel checks or tear down. In the North East most races are within a few hours to a day of driving. Anything South or West are days of driving. I remember at 75&80 and other tracks S/SS was every week end. It would help if all the XHRA’s would collaborate with each other. Use / Rent each other’s tracks and personnel. Make setting local and National Records exciting. Map where one race does not compete with another. Work with S/SS associations to fill in race dates. Maybe Get them involved with Divisional Points Get a marketing company to advertise S/SS for the public for all tracks. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
For the record I do believe Barry said he is NOT a fan of lowering the indexes, but would like to see NHRA do something about the AFHS.
Barry I think you may be wrong in thinking that no new or young people want to get into stock. My son joined the ranks this year, and I have another one behind him. You are correct stock is not cheap anymore, however lowering the indexes won't help. Stock needs to stay as a entry level class. We need to keep it affordable for new and young people to come join us and Learn. Let's show them what it takes to work on a car and let them want to get faster for the heads up races. If we just keep changing indexes and rules just to suite the faster cars we will have NO future. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
IMHO pure stock was a good class. Pretty much stock eliminator before the valve spring change. With adherence to those rules anybody can afford to race. And the challenge of building a good car within the rules was there for anyone. Hence the term "entry level". Super stock is there for anyone who wants to really push it. Stock today, one way or another, is what the racers asked for which brings us to today's reality of the class. Not exactly my idea of progress.
|
Re: Index Change Rumor
Racing of any kind is not and never has been cheap. It is for most of us a secondary part of life. A hobby, a fascination, an addiction, a secondary source of income, a part of the business you are in, etc. Most it is not the primary source of income but something we do with our spare money or whatever.
Race fuel, slicks, engines and transmissions set up for any type of racing, safety equipment, support vehicle and trailer, entry fees, hotels, gas, tolls, and time off work it gets expensive real quick. Racing is a luxury that many can't afford, racing at the National Event level is a privilege. Know this going in and it is much easier to accept. |
Re: Index Change Rumor
I am not for lowering the index's in stock. I think you would lose some racers that are on the lower end of the qualifying sheet.
For us personally It would be a good thing to have the index lowered, but for the class as a whole, not so much. Lowering the index's would only help the minority. Just my 2 cents |
Re: Index Change Rumor
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.