Re: Factory experimental
 

700 Horse power and a 7.5 weight break makes the Mustang 5250 pounds.

Re: Factory experimental
 

Tell that to going broke2.He must have missed my post.I'd like to see where they hide that weight.

Re: Factory experimental
 

" The pump don't work 'cause the vandals took the handle"

Re: Factory experimental
 

Bucket? I like my old bucket. It still does everything that I need a bucket to do. I also like the fact that I can still s**t in my bucket and throw it all over your shiny pumper truck!

Re: Factory experimental
 

GoingBroke,

You don't get it do you? I guess you don't get it because you don't have anything invested in this issue.

And NO I don't think this is all about ME. You can come up with all these oddball comments, but you have not offered anything to this discussion. NO you don't have to agree with me but it is important for all of us to note that you have nothing to lose from your point of view.

This issue of After Market Super Stock Cars in Stock harms dozens of racers and it is important that we understand what Ford and nhra are up to. Now from your selfish point of view it is okay for a willful nhra to allow these After Market Super Stock Cars to run in STOCK. Even though this corrupt decision by nhra will turn millions of dollars of great race cars in to glorified door stops. And NO this issue is not all about me. It's about ALL of us who have worked hard, spent our hard earned dollars to build these damn cars to nhra specifications only to be back stabbed by a greedy sanctioning body and OEM's. It's total crap and you can sit back and chuckle all you want but this corrupt behavior by nhra and Ford is hurting a lot of racers. You guys don't have to like my suggestion for putting these cars in a Factory Experimental class, however, they should not be in our regular Stock classes. These cars don't represent a slight change in the way we race. They are category killers. And in the end you will see that it impacts all the classes not just the AA and A classes. I'm sure nhra would love to see these Super Stockers in the hands of enough millionaires where they could dump all the classes and pass them off to the public as the New Stock Eliminator.

Good luck!

Re: Factory experimental
 

Well said Bruce. Allowing aftermarket purpose built race cars in stock eliminator is a perversion of the rules. Stock was created for regular assembly line cars that available to the public. The motor in this Mustang is not even available in a production Mustang. I notice that most of the people who favor this don't race in Stock with the exception of my good friend Chuck. Those of you who think this will make stock stronger don't have a clue. One other thing, perversion of the rules is becoming commonplace with NHRA these days.

Greg

Re: Factory experimental
 

Once again, NHRA completely ignores the law of unintended consequences, in a quest for the biggest payoff. There used to be a rule against aftermarket "tuner cars", especially those with superchargers. Anyone else actually look at the supercharger on this particular combination, and what it is actually designed to fit? When this first leaked out a while back, I did. If you know anything about engines, supercharging, and racing, you'll understand, if you don't, well, no one will ever help you figure it out. In the past, cars like this were either illegal, or immediately placed in Super Stock or another class where they actually belong.

It's funny, the ZL-1 Camaro, an actual factory production car that met all the rules, was removed from the class guide, and only recently (2005) reinstated. Funnier still, the factory production 1967 Corvette L-88 was also removed, on grounds that not enough were produced, when 36 were sold to the public, and dozens were given to racers (easily making the 50 car quota). But there are other cars that were never actually sold to the public that are allowed, and even racers and fans of that brand say they should not be.

The factory Challenger is one thing, but a Roush supercharged car is entirely different. And it has absolutely nothing to do with the "base brand" of the car, either.

Now, the next thing is, a bunch of people will come in saying this is all just a bunch of whining by the Chevy guys. Wrong again. It won't be just a few guys with L-88 Corvettes, LS-6 Chevelles, and the ZL-1 or L-72 Camaros, there'll be plenty of guys with even more expensive Hemi cars, and 427 Fords that get the short, but stiff, end of the stick from NHRA on this one. Some of those guys have had their cars for 30, and some even close to 40, years. I guess NHRA has already had enough of their little guy dollars, they're ready to take some big bucks from the factory and the tuner.:rolleyes:

Re: Factory experimental
 

Wow! I guess that I can die in my sleep and be a happy man! First Bruce and now Greg! Hey guys, while I will agree with you both 100% about "Factory Superstockers" coming into Stock, the "Perversion of the rules" has been going on for so long now (and usually with certain racers approval) that I'm sure that the suits in Glendora just figure this latest perversion is just the norm. We need the OEMs if for nothing else then for the publicity that they can generate. BUT, we need them participating within the "intent and spirit" of the rules. As far as I'm concerned, we all brought this upon ourselves by allowing "the rules" to be stretched and bent (and ignored) to the point that even I (the dumb s**t that I am) know that Stock is not Stock anymore. I feel that the dreaded AHFS was just NHRAs way of telling us"we can't enforce the rules anymore so go ahead and enhance heads and intakes and run parts breaker cams and we'll just tag on some HP". Greg, you and Woodro seem to be driving this runner volume issue and I'm going to guess (and I'll bet that it's a pretty good guess) that it's being driven to just try and make legal some "enhanced" heads that aren't legal now. Oh but let's see, now we've got NO valve seat rule and any steel valve which is going to make our runners bigger. I fail to see a difference between what Ford and Chrysler are doing with engines that never came in cars and what we are doing with valves, heads, brakes, fuel cells, ceramic lifters,wheelie bars, etc that never came in cars. BTW, LT1s never came in 98 Firebirds.

Re: Factory experimental
 

Billy, it seems to me there is a large difference between allowing a small variance in runner volumes because of rule changes over the years and letting a blown aftermarket built race car in stock.

Greg

Re: Factory experimental
 

Greg, they are both "perversions of the rules". Period. I guess that the difference you are seeing is that it's OK to steal a little but it's not OK to steal a lot!