Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Thanks for all the replies.
I didn't remember that it was allowable to change the intake. Chevy had a really good one for the time that was used on the 375 horse stuff and it would have worked well. It just wasn't the one the factory used on the 450 hp piece. The thing with the stock LS6 piece was that it had almost no rise whatsoever, probably a lot less than even the low hp cast iron parts. According to the info I've seen, the LS6 was designed for the 1970 Corvette and was going to be the logical progression for the 427/425 and 427/435. Very close to model launch, the engine was killed for the Corvette but released for the Chevelles. That flatness was so it would clear the hood of a Corvette but the beancounters wanted to use the intake since it had been tooled and the investment had been made. I've never seen the originals, but there are GM materials floating around showing an entire family of 454s in 1970, including the LS7 which was slated to replace the L88 and also a tripower 454 with big heads and solid lifters. The insurance thing was getting too hot and GM withdrew the engines before they were ever put into production. So the top of the line Chevelle got an intake that looked like it belonged on a Olds 350 2bbl and the Corvette maxed out with a hydraulic 390 hp small port engine in 1970. And yes, the fiber optic thing was a joke but I have seen some strange options on "factory supplied" cars. |
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Hi Dave Colbert......I built a '69 Camaro around 1979. I intended to just bracket race it but was talked into making it a SS/JA by the men at Crow's Head Shop....I soon was working there and did for 10 years. We machined lots of stuff for T/K's and I spoke to Ralph all the time. You might have been there.
The Camaro I built got a cam recommended by Ralph and it was one he said you used with great success. I had a cam reground to those specs. It was a G-K 308......I broke a pile of parts with that cam! Maybe it was because it was a regrind. I tried all kinds of things to stop the breakage but had to get that cam outta there.....I had much better luck with a Cam Dynamics or a Lunati......I never could run with the lead guys but gave it a try.......Best et was 11.18 at 118 around 1981 or 1982. The good cars were dipping into the 10.90's by then... |
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Quote:
|
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Intake manifold for Ray Allens/Briggs Chevrolet,,,,,,,
looks to be an aluminum dual-plane high riser,,,,,,GM-brand Slicks,,,,,,,,went from M & H Racemaster,,,then to Good Year, Firestones on the front,,,,,,,,, SS/EA National Record for 1970, Beginning of the year; 11.61 11.55 11.37 11.33 11.31 11.27 End of year |
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
http://i975.photobucket.com/albums/a...L_GOULD_01.jpg
Tim Richards of Pennyslvania,,,,,, Karl Gould Chrysler-Plymouth, out of Vestal, New York. A damn good running SS/EA 1970 Hemi Superbird. |
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Not sure if it's been mentioned but wasn't Ray the 1970 NHRA Super Stock World Champ...and did he clinch it in that final (against Crutchfield) at Ontario? BTW, that looks like Wenzel's car in the other lane against Charbonneau....
|
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Jim Hale had a gooney bird for awhile. Took a lot of crap over that ugly sucker. lol
|
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Quote:
|
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Terry is correct, if you qualified for the finials you got a certificate with your name scrolled on top and signed by Steve Gibbs and a fee entry to the finials in the mail.
|
Re: Ray Allen versus Jack Werst '1970 SS/EA Showdown'
Jess , ask Bob Glidden how he entered two cars in S/S at the same race in 1972 .
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.