Originally Posted by RULER (Post 710030)

So now he shows up at the next race runs a test day then hears someone may want to take a look at his car, so he leaves the event? Anyone think there?s something wrong here? Looks wrong to me.

Originally Posted by TILBURG (Post 710074)

Question how much of a issue is it to have the software written that when there is a 1.30 under run it triggers the tower and then they can communicate with the scales? Maybe it will only result in finding out the guy/girl is in the wrong class but maybe this could have been avoided.
Second how much longer are you guys/girls going to run with this broken system. If this is supposed to be a performance based class then why is the most frequent ask question " what do i have to do to slow it down"?? Starting to sound more like a throttle stop class than a performance based class. What is the system there to protect?? Lets take the AH class you really think that them guys are going to see how much oil they can run and timing they can pull just to make the 3 at the bottom of the sheet feel better??? The time it takes to look at every run down the track what class it was in and an average of all them that time couldn't be better spent elsewhere. How do you race a performance based class with a noose around your neck and call it fun?

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner (Post 710080)

All of those in favor of not reducing the indexes by .3 are the ones you thank for that!

Originally Posted by Lyn Smith (Post 710082)

Most SS and Stock racers are not concerned about the indexes or AHFS. At least not in Div. 3 where only 10% of the registered racers voted for, or against a change.

Originally Posted by SDmopar (Post 710086)

Maybe the easy fix is let?s go back to the original HP ratings on all combos. Then lower index 3 tenths and do away with the AFHS. Everyone will be happy and nobody will have a reason to cry. The automatic system was to create parity. It seems most don?t want that. So let?s do away with all previous corrections.