Re: Crate Motor Class
What is the highest HP rated crate Motor available for class? What's the fastest a crate car has run in IHRA et wise?
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
Also , nobody's saying you have to build 50 year old cars. |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
I hate to break it to you guys but Stock eliminator doesn't need to be saved, IHRA does.
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Ken I race a lot and I can tell you in division 3 alone we have at least 60 to 80 stockers at a race and Hell our combo races at Beach Bend its nothing to have 50 stock and Super Stockers. IHRA is Dying crate motors are not wanted or needed in NHRA may as well build a bracket car . We have too many classes in Stock as it is
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
IHRA has lost their relevance, shame because there were and are a few good souls left. Had a lot of fun running the races and enjoyed the fact that we had 3-4 majors and all the divisional races within an 8 hour drive. It was a great time and we would easily have at least half a dozen and maybe even a dozen cars in our convoy coming down from Ontario. The beginning of the end of the loss of class run offs, then they virtually turned their back on the Ohio/Michigan/Ontario corridor for what ever reasons and bam we no longer have the excitement we once had.
Nostalgia! |
Re: Crate Motor Class
It would be really interesting to see how fast the Traditional Stockers would be, as they're converted to Crate Motor Stockers. Racers by nature will exploit the rules, take advantage of softer indexes and lower HP ratings to make their cars more competitive. My advice to Crate Motor Racers is, "be careful what you wish for." You might see your combo hit harder than you ever thought possible. It'd be cheaper to build a stocker combo, than to try and keep up with some of the "wallets" in stock eliminator. It's not gonna be Easier or Cheaper to run a Crate Motor Combo...Guaranteed !
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Several years ago, there was a proposal for a 'crate motor' Comp Eliminator class with one each Chevy, Ford & Mopar motor combo with soft indexes. The story was that NHRA killed the idea before it got off the ground, they got word that engine builders weren't happy about having to run on kill while the crate motor class had a soft index, they had plans to build one off motors to bomb the indexes on day one. So yeah, be careful what you wish for. I know a couple of brothers that live up the street from me who would just love to bomb the HP factor on something like this.
Jim Caughlin SS 6019 |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
http://www.ihra.com/competition/comp...t/category/211 Ford CM Engines ● 460 / 535 @ 515 ● 514 / 600 @ 520 Last I could find on some other combos: Chevy 502/502 was rated at 443 500 / 445 Mopar (Wedge) at 443 Outside of Top Stock, the big HP combinations were few and far between. Most crate motor guys ran small blocks. I know Terry Taylor went 9.60's in A/CM many years ago. I'm sure Nitro Joe has the stats from back in the day. When IHRA did away with record points, class runoffs, etc people quit caring about performance as much. FYI, my old 360 Magnum crate motor was rated at 325. Add aluminum heads with bigger valves, more cam, almost 2 points more compression, and a 1000cfm throttle body and you have a 5.9L DragPak, rated by NHRA in its infinite wisdom at 275HP. LOL Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Come on Michael, I love ya , don't act like a liberal and make partial quotes. The point is the cost of crate motors will double, triple, maybe quadruple if approved for NHRA class racing. I don't care about the past costs. We know what will happen. And that's a fact. Plus add to that your chances of a heads up, and if you're a slug, there are no wins. Even if you're as good a driver as you !
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
This battle about Crate Motors is not much different than Pure Stock community Or earlier about the GT classes. Stock had to morph for many reasons. Such as the plethora of high performance Vehicles from other non US companies and not being included into Stock. The new generation of kids like the Rice Burners because that is what they can afford. The pitiful US choices against the foreign markets. The 91-96 B-body community is growing because useful platforms are available. When GM Ford and Chrysler reformed after the recession. They began producing some cool cars... Including race ready Factory race cars for $100000 ! Crate Motors is natural extension of Stock. Spirit of Stock taking approved combinations and stuffing into useful platforms. Combinations that run in the same ET range as current Stock before the COPO and Factory built racers. Older and nostalgic combinations are being considered with modern engines. Where their older power plants with vintage parts are becoming expensive. Upgrading from a 273 4v to and 360 4v is a bolt in procedure. Think Pure Stock would benefit allowing us to upgrade to a more powerful version. Already Stock has morphed from Stock with limited Cam specs to junior Super Stock. In 70s and 80s the Stockers were never quick enough to qualify in a SS field, but they are now! At any rate Crate Motors cars are a good addition to Stock. D |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
You have to attend an IHRA race to see them! D |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
If you think that the NHRA needs saving, build a legal NHRA car and enter some events..... There are also people who buy a house next to an airport because it is cheaper... After they buy they put all of their efforts into closing the airport that was there first... Just sayin' |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Well said Bob.
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
People outspent me in Crate Motor, too. I won some heads-up races, I lost some heads-up races. I set numerous records, won and lost Class, and won two World Championships and numerous Division Championships. How much someone else spends is completely irrelevant, so long as you can run under the index. I'm sorry if anyone is offended that they have more money than I will ever have. The Turismo must REALLY p*ss people off. :p I love you, too, but you know me far better than to ever throw a BS line like "liberal"-anything my way. This discussion is academic anyway, as IHRA is dying and NHRA isn't going to add Crate Motors. |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
SO what? What is it you want to forget ... FS, GT, ProMod, Bracket Racing, Pure Stock to Stock, Pro Stock... Everything morphs because it can !! D |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Pure Stock did not "morph into Stock", Stock was here first. NHRA tried Pure Stock for a short while several years ago, then dropped it.
As Michael stated, IHRA is dying, and NHRA is not going to add crate motors. Nor add Pure Stock again. Might want to build an NHRA car, or go bracket racing. |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
It was Pure Stock ever before it was Stock. After 1973 the Blueprinted cams were reintroduced and has not stopped morphing..... Basically Stock today is SS Lite !! More complex and new rules implemented to keep the cars safe. IHRA is not dying and will survive because enough us want it to. I am not a complaining sideliner. Doing my bit being a Contingency Sponsor. Hope that someone on the Crate Motor side may do the same. Create a buzz and start a movement ! Pure Stock LIVES !! and So will Crate Motor !! D |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
I do hope they make it and it turns around. |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
IHRA is attracting an ok amount of cars, just not enough ! I like the IHRA model which allows us two days to race. Got a lot of ideas that think will work to attract racers and the public. My IT business is 25 years old and you learn a few lessons. How do you survive and profit in tough times. I learned to ask myself Why and not others why? Who, what, when, where, chasing the hidden, overlooked and subtle. Mentioned this before I will forever kick myself for not supporting Mike Beard on his second attempt to build up his S/SS race. The Pure Stock Challenge had momentum and lost it. It was an opportunity to attract more cars than the year before. I let him down. Crate Motor movement needs their own advocate. Someone needs to step up to make it better. I like that they do something different. Already got one Movement to work on. Dan |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Dan, I set NHRA national records in Stock back in the 1960s, and it was NOT the same as Pure Stock. Appearing to think we ran GM cams, right out of the box, stock appearing pistons & rings, etc,etc, shows how little you know about it.
When almost no cars or spectators show up, and pretty much no contingency sponsors, it is dying. My business is 45 years old. I can tell when one is dying. IHRA is dying. |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
They don't want all the cars they have now. Fall Vegas filled up @ 5 GP's, 6 weeks in advance. So, either they want you to go to more and more points meets, or just go away all together. They only want 4 cars on Sunday for filler, so eventually, they'll probably just invite the top 4 F/X cars in points or something like that. What they're actually doing is driving class cars back to the association races. Most of them allow IHRA class cars. That's where C/M and Pure cars ought to do their racing. NHRA doesn't want us..and they don't want you. |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
You do not speak for me! I ran Stock in 1972 and 73 with a 64 Impala SS. Know the rules and what happened then. Remember arguments what NHRA considered Legal despite the PN recorded. Had to run the pistons in the stock position. Ran off the national records instead of the index. If you ran low 12's you were considered screaming fast. Later ran a 69 Impala in M/SA until marriage and family took center stage. IHRA has never been a popular as NHRA. Even NASCAR is having issues. D |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
|
Re: Crate Motor Class
Quote:
NHRA has considered Crate Motors and may still happen. Like that you car race twice in a weekend. Not going to happen in NHRA. As for CM engine being less expensive, it is not that much difference. Less expensive is a good idea considering running Stock is expensive. Our biggest cost are the Rigs, Tow Vehicles, Lodging, Fuel and stuff breaks. AND the Parroting is because why you don't like CM? NHRA would be wise to adopt Pure Stock and CM. It would help both Drag Racing operations. More people would build them. Maybe that is the real ire about CM and PS? D |
Re: Crate Motor Class
Dan, maybe you could explain why it would be "wise" for NHRA to open the door to allow Pure Stock or Crate Motor cars into Stock Eliminator. It seems like there are already more real NHRA legal Stockers out there than spots in NHRA National events. As for "helping both organizations", if the entire 6 car Pure Stock contingent moved to NHRA, how would that help IHRA? Why, that seems to be about 1/2 the number of Stockers racing in IHRA "national events" these days!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.