Re: worst red light debate, again!
Mark.....It's like the UN where I live anymore. I feel like a foreigner....I speak perfect English.....and can spell reasonably well....
Bill Dedman you have basically taken up the cause that was once championed by Steve Taylor......I used to think like a lot of guys and that was leave well enough alone on this issue.....but I agree it should be changed to WORST redlight, not first.....In all the years I've raced I can't really recall a race where we both redlit.....and I was the faster car in many races and benefitted from opponents redlights. It usually distracted me and I was late, not red.......Fair is fair and it makes sense. I don't race a Stocker anymore so my opinon doesn't count though...same as yours...LOL |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Most racers fight anything to do with changes, not that is has anything to do with right or wrong. NHRA didn't bat an eye though at changing the Xmas tree at the 4-wide nationals and then brought it to Houston and beyond. The darn thing looks like the robot out of the movie "Short Curcuit" staring Ally Sheedy and does't display well for the TV viewer. A couple of years back at Bristol they ran TF against FC, and I bet if they had continued that format I bet we would have seen a WRL rule put into effect there, because the Pros will not tollerate their apponent having any kind of advantage if they can help it. "Number five is alive"
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
NHRA puts the races on, so that is why we will never see a double red light rule. NHRA is not interested.
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
If both racers red light, why not disqualify both of them. If both drivers red light, and both hit the wall, the one with the worst damage loses. If both red light and one hits the wall and one crosses the center line, the one who doesn't cross the finish line wins. If you have a bye run and red light, hit the wall, and cross the center line........who wins then.... If you have a bye run and hit the wall, cross the centerline, leak oil all over the track and take out the timing lights, who wins then................this is all so unfair. First or worse, if the other guy goes red and I then sit and take a 2 second light, will you say that is unfair since I didn't try to cut a light? Give it a rest.....
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
(I thought you were speaking that weird dialect too, for a minute there,..buddy) |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
Steve Taylor was a friend who championed this cause for awhile, but he had another system I never could get into that was based on comparing "packages" to determine a winner. The worse (or, double) red light system was a product of a guy in Fremont CA (and not Steve Taylor, I believe) whose name is Bob Mikulic. He told me about it back in the '90s, when I still lived in the San Francisco Bay area. I couldn't grasp the value of it immediately and frankly, didn't pay much attention to it UNTIL I had had time for it to soak in. Eventually, I began to understand (I am a slow learner) and finally, one day it was clear as a bell. I dunno how long that took, but it was a while, as I'd been used to the first red light deal for many, many years... that was my "norm." Bob Mickuic was a bracket racer who raced supercharged Studebakers for years. Anyway, he's still around, and is mildly interested in the worse red light rule, but has little hope that he'll ever live to see it in place. I feel pretty much the same way. |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
If you did that, in the interest of consistency, you would then, have to disqualify both cars in a double break-out. Does that appeal to you? |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
Are you kidding me? Now, finally this makes sense!!! Where EVERYTHING has to be fair; they don't believe in scoring children's game's, everybody that tries get's an A.... Yes, seriously, this all makes sense now! |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
1 Attachment(s)
From now on this is the only red light I'm giving any thought to:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Originally posted by Jeff Lee;
........The distraction of an opponents red light sometimes has the opposite affect on my as I seem to side step the clutch at that point. Then again, a red light was maybe in my cards mo matter what the other lane did; we'll never know. Originally posted by Rich Bibel; .....In all the years I've raced I can't really recall a race where we both redlit.....and I was the faster car in many races and benefitted from opponents redlights. It usually distracted me and I was late, not red.......Fair is fair and it makes sense. In the intertest of "fair is fair", and to make 'first or worst' work, the opposite side of the tree must be blocked from each competitor. |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Stock is bracket racing Ed......has been for years......Sure there is always the possibility of heads up runs and there is qualifying but overall it's bracket racing. The people who have won the most in the last 10 years were/are great bracket racers first....
If it isn't than leave your shoe polish home and race off National Records....with some sort of different break out rules like we did in my JR.Stock days..... And if you run under the record to win a National event it becomes a new record......... Redlight rules would be the least of your worries....LOL |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
So, the unfair practices that go on under the auspices (look it up, Ed F.) of the rules "enjoyed" by the Stock/Super-Stock racers are also visited upon the Bracket racers. No difference that I am aware of. If EITHER of you EDs" can show me a difference, I'd appreciate it. I don't think there IS any... which simply means that I (as a Bracket Racer) suffer the same unnecessary unequal red light jeopardy that Class racers face when they run a car with a quicker dial-in. THAT is why all the pissin' and moanin' I do on this forum makes sense: the Brackets likely won't change their M.O. until NHRA does.... which could be never (and, probably will.) |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
This horse has been dead so long it has turned to dust!!!!!!! LOL
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
hey bill do you smoke cigarettes?
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
I had a discussion with NHRA today about some other stuff and at the end I asked "have you seen the onlone debate on ClassRacer about red lights?" He had...I asked if NHRA would EVER consider such a change and the answer was emphatically..."NO! First person to red light is OUT OF THE GAME (unless the opponent crosses the centerline, etc.)"
There...I'm done! |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Oh well....
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Oh well....
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
[QUOTE=bill dedman;257018]So, the unfair practices that go on under the auspices (look it up, Ed F.) of the rules "enjoyed" by the Stock/Super-Stock racers are also visited upon the Bracket racers.
No difference that I am aware of. If EITHER of you EDs" can show me a difference, I'd appreciate it. IQUOTE] Well, have either of you genuises come up with a difference, or is your silence a tacit (look it up, Ed F.) "NO."? I'm waiting... |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
[QUOTE=bill dedman;257054]
Quote:
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
[QUOTE=Ed Fernandez;257069]
Quote:
NO it's the whiner's and crybaby's guide to gaining sympathy. |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
This thread is hilarious, it’s like watching two fleas arguing over who owns the dog they live on. Totally irrelevant….
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
Nobody read Jeff's post about talking to NHRA? Don't believe him? Why? |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
[QUOTE=Ed Fernandez;257069]
Quote:
Why? |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
Can you do that? Or, do you know? |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
My answer is I don't care if they change it or not. And I think you are wasting your time. I would think Jeff's answer from an NHRA official should finally put a fork in this farce. Don't you get it? Ain't gonna happen. Get over it.
|
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
He shouldn't. If you don't agree, you're either fatalistic or a masochist... or just too dumb to realize you just got screwed by an unfair rule. Unfair and unnecessary. I KNOW you're smarter than that... |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
Yes, I believe him. And there are a number of reasons why it will not change and I can't believe no one here has addressed the most obvious one. Yes, the current rule gives the faster car the advantage. Most people note the cars in SS or S in classes A,B,C and D as an example. Now ask yourself, what manufacturers have cars in those classes and what kind of working relationship do they have with NHRA??? Like it or not NHRA is in the business of taking in money..... as a non-profit as they claim (which is another issue) or as a money making enterprise. And those manufacturers are major contributors. NHRA is also in the business of promoting fast, high performance cars like the ones in the aforementioned classes. Those promotions help NHRA and they help the manufacturers. End of story. The rule helps the people who give the most. It always has and it probably always will. It's simple business economics. There are other legal issues as well but that's another long winded post. And I've already noted the most obvious reason why it's the way it is. |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
If I red light, shame on me. I lost. I don't care what the other guy does. Maybe you could get Obama to look into it. Life's not fair. Some of us are better looking (not me) some of us are smarter (not me) and try harder so we are more successful and make more money to build faster cars. I don't have a fast car so I most always leave first. I still don't care. I'd I go red I'm upset enough with myself I don't care what happens to the other guy.
If were you I would call Obama. |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
Absolutely I know. I am a realist. I see the world for what it is and I adjust my actions accordingly. Look at my track record. I won my first Super Stock race in a SS/B car. I won Comp at Topeka and the Winston World Finals in B/Altered, where I spotted a C/ED. I went from number 32 qualifier at Gainsville to runner up on red lights. That is the way it is. The rule is the same for everyone, including you. You have the same opportunity to change classes and improve your chances of winning as I did but you refuse to accept that as an option. I learned long ago that you and you alone are responsible for your successes and you and you alone are responsible for your failures. What are you going to do about your future???? The choice is yours. |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Quote:
David Nickens told me a long time ago. The last thing you want to do is go to the starting line and beat yourself. At least make your opponent earn the win. |
Re: worst red light debate, again!
I certainly did not read all of these posts so I am not sure if this was suggested
You both redlight - you both lose - simple and fair Why give an advatage to either guy when they both f...ed up Solomon ordered, "Cut the baby in half! That way each of you can have part of him." That sould keep this going for another few pages Apply to call classes all categories - Pros, alcohol, index, and all handicapped racing LMAO :-) peace |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.