CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=14539)

Ed Carpenter 12-05-2008 06:45 PM

IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
SUPER STOCK

If 2 competitors are in the same class at the World Finals Tournament of Champions they will run off of a dial in.

A jacket and pants meeting a minimum of SFI 3.2A-5 and a 3.3 neck collar are mandatory on all entries going 9.99 or quicker1/4 or 6.40 1/8

A jacket and pants meeting a minimum of SFI 3.2A-1 are mandatory on all entries going 10.00 and slower ΒΌ or 6.40 and slower 1/8.

Engines may be a maximum of .075 overbore.

Why in the hell do we have classes if your not going to run heads up?

ss3845 12-05-2008 09:52 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
Might as well change the name from SuperStock to "No Box". Another reason they won't get participation from the die hard NHRA guys. No heads up, no tear down, just another bracket race.

Mike Fuller 12-05-2008 10:58 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
I Agree! IHRA is headed in the wrong direction. We don't need any more " NO BOX CLASSES"

Doug Blackley 12-06-2008 12:23 AM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
Didn't someone else try that once before with IHRA? Hmmm... how'd that work out then...

Myron Piatek 12-06-2008 12:37 AM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
I guess the "no heads-up" deal just at the year end World Finals is to keep anyone with a fast car from positioning themselves in a class where they can outrun the other qualified competitors. The field will be smaller than normal and the attendees will be known in advance. I don't believe the other "shootouts" have heads-up runs either. But one still has to make it through any possible heads-up runs during the course of the regular season to qualify.

As for the firesuits:

"A jacket and pants meeting a minimum of SFI 3.2A-1 are mandatory on all entries going 10.00 to 11.49 1/4 or 6.40 to 7.50 1/8."

I think they should have more specific ET breaks, perhaps based on indexes. With the way it is, a person can theoretically race without fire pants one run and be required to have them on another during the course of an event, or even the same day. What happens if someone runs below the minimum?

donald j raiser 12-06-2008 08:35 AM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
i love it, no heads up runs.

rb1941 12-06-2008 10:41 AM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
you are right D J, you and 95% of all other racers. you can cut their buts not running heads up.of course the only rounds some racers can win is heads up.

donald j raiser 12-06-2008 11:32 AM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rb1941 (Post 95252)
you are right d j, you and 95% of all other racers. You can cut their buts not running heads up.of course the only rounds some racers can win is heads up.

don't get me wrong, i really respect the fast guys, i just don't have the skill, or dollars to run fast.

tpoh815 12-06-2008 12:53 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
I dont have a problem with the"NO HEADS UP' ! How bout we all worry about it anyway! Its the offseason so lets pick on a subject like the end of next year. Now I win the heads up for that.

buzzinhalfdozen 12-06-2008 01:06 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
RB1941 So using that logic only 5% of the class racers are building and racing their cars for the reason the CLASS concept was made? That seems low to me maybe I'm old school, but I remember racing Hot Rod and Super Rod waiting for the day I could aqcuire the skills and $ to run with the CLASS cars. I believe besides trying to turn on the win lite, most of the guys I talk to want to be able to say " i've got the fastest one" it's obvious that there are better driver than others all you have to do is look at the points standing year to year, seems like the same names just in a different order. There seems to be a lack of interest in the performance side of class racing lately, I for one believe if your'e going to race in a performance based class you should want to work towards performance. I'm aware that speed costs money and not every racer is a engine builder or chassis expert which requires even more money if you can't do alot of your own work. Having a fast class car is alot of work and expense and not for everyone.Heck I don't have a fast car yet but I'm working on it. We need to try and bring the CLASS back to Class racing. Just my opinion, Joe

Bill Howell 12-06-2008 01:35 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
This was the same reasoning that IHRA would not let you run a different car when they first started the 8 car points leaders run off for the $5000 winner take all purse they had in the early 90's.
They didn't want someone borrowing a fast car to take advantage of a heads up situation in the shoot outs.
I believe it was 90 or 91 when a racer entered someone else's faster car when he had Cleo Chandler first round in the shoot out and it would have been heads up. Robert Leonard with IHRA made him run his own car. (Cleo beat him first round and won the race! She was in her 70's at the time and had 3 lights .01 or better in eliminations.)

Myron Piatek 12-06-2008 01:51 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
Joe,

I respect and understand your opinion. Unfortunately, I believe there would have been NO class racing a long time ago if the handicap system wasn't put into place. If more emphasis was put on HP and the money to get it, it would just be a different group of the same names in a different order from year-to-year than what we have now. The low budget person still has a good opportunity to be competitive, even if he/she has to "hide" in a different class to get away from any "killer cars". But there is still the compromise of an occasional heads-up race in eliminations and the bragging rights of class eliminations at some events, not to mention qualifying position.

Better rewards for class winners could help. But even that has been getting worse with the economy. Right now I'm really worried that Mopar may not have a contingency program for 2009, especially for IHRA class where it was the best sponsor and the only one I benefitted from.

So basically, for years the economy has been forcing less emphasis on being the fastest in order to keep the car counts and classes alive. As long as people can still be competitive without having to "keep up with the Joneses", there will be some cars built and raced. That helps participation, manufacturers, etc. The interest is there to go fast, just not the money. Personally, it kinda seems like the Pro teams, which obviously are all heads-up, are having more problems than Sportsman racers in keeping their "heads up" :p above he water.

Michael Beard 12-06-2008 04:31 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
Order your SFI pants yet, Myron, or are you going to run K this year on a 2bbl? :cool:

I wonder who will be paying contingency on them? That will help make my decision on who to buy from.

THE LEGEND 12-07-2008 06:05 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
I know IMPACT and STROUD pay for firesuit.

I've never seen a shootout have HEADSUP.

Does the NHRA AllStars have HeadsUp?
Probably not but nobody will fuss about them.LOL
Chip

Myron Piatek 12-07-2008 06:51 PM

Re: IHRA Finals/Tourn of Champions
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Beard (Post 95287)
Order your SFI pants yet, Myron, or are you going to run K this year on a 2bbl? :cool:

I wonder who will be paying contingency on them? That will help make my decision on who to buy from.

Not yet. But looking around to see if I still had a pair of pants I never wore. Already have a Stroud jacket and helmet.

I may just take out all of the "K" and "J" weight, hook up the back barrels and run in "I" where it will be easy pickins! ;) :p


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.