CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   new HP factors (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=19219)

Denny Steward 07-24-2009 01:21 PM

new HP factors
 
They are up on NHRA websight

Jeff Lee 07-24-2009 03:06 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Really? Where would they hide it?

Alan Roehrich 07-24-2009 03:12 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Lee (Post 131409)
Really? Where would they hide it?

It is on the Lucas Oil page, follow the Lucas Oil link at the top of the forum.

Let me be the first to congratulate the 70-71 Challenger and Cuda Hemi racers, they got their 12HP back off, they are back down to 445 from 457. Since Fred was NOT required to scale, tech, or fuel check after that pass, taking that 12 back off was the right thing for NHRA to do.

442OLDS 07-24-2009 03:16 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
http://www.nhra.net/content/sportsma...7590&zoneid=85


Competitor requests:


http://www.nhra.net/content/sportsma...7589&zoneid=85

442OLDS 07-24-2009 03:23 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 131413)
It is on the Lucas Oil page, follow the Lucas Oil link at the top of the forum.

Let me be the first to congratulate the 70-71 Challenger and Cuda Hemi racers, they got their 12HP back off, they are back down to 445 from 457. Since Fred was NOT required to scale, tech, or fuel check after that pass, taking that 12 back off was the right thing for NHRA to do.


They will not even take 5 horsepower off of a 1970 455 Oldsmobile,but they take 12 off this combo?

Alan Roehrich 07-24-2009 05:43 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 442OLDS (Post 131415)
They will not even take 5 horsepower off of a 1970 455 Oldsmobile,but they take 12 off this combo?

They should not have put the 12 HP on. That whole deal was done wrong, and NHRA has finally made it right.

I'm not real well up on the Olds, I've got a friend who has a couple, and he doesn't race them because they aren't fast enough. I'd say the Olds probably does need some HP off, maybe if enough proof is shown to the right people it might get it, I hope so.

bill dedman 07-24-2009 11:36 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Did Fred only get 12 HP on that deal?

I am not at all sure, but I thought it was more than that (12).
I can't remember what his factored HP was before the "hit," but 12 HP is only 96 pounds in A/SA ; I thought he had to add more than that.

Or, did I just dream this.....????

George Fitzpatrick 07-25-2009 09:04 AM

Re: new HP factors
 
In less than 18 months that combo (70/ 71 challenger /cuda 426 Hemi) was hit with over 27 hp or 215 IBS. So yes the reduction was deserved. It should have been more. This combo was killed. Even now rated @ 445 the car weights in @ 3730 with driver in A/SA. Don’t know the olds situation so can’t comment.

bsa633 07-25-2009 09:17 AM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bill dedman (Post 131460)
Did Fred only get 12 HP on that deal?

I am not at all sure, but I thought it was more than that (12).
I can't remember what his factored HP was before the "hit," but 12 HP is only 96 pounds in A/SA ; I thought he had to add more than that.

Or, did I just dream this.....????

,
,i'm pretty sure it was 442hp before Henson deal! I think it got 6 hp 2 times before that from 430 to 436 and to 442...also in a relatively short period!

Kevin Love 07-25-2009 01:57 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
What others did you want them to fix?

Byron Worner 07-25-2009 02:04 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
The rules of the system need fixed!!! Apparently they changed this year and nobody was notified.

art leong 07-25-2009 05:32 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
The 67 to 71 street hemi was 440 hp in all bodies back in the seventies So 445 dosent sound to bad.

art leong 07-25-2009 05:34 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Byron Worner (Post 131514)
The rules of the system need fixed!!! Apparently they changed this year and nobody was notified.

They changed them when I got hit and nobody noticed either

treessavoy 07-26-2009 08:42 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Dear Mr. NHRA,

1964 belvedre's NEVER came with the 273 so dropping the HP to 166 didn't help at all! That combination wasn't available until 1965!

mannymen 07-26-2009 09:08 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
NHRA only has $16 in their AFHS/HP Factoring budget and it looks like they spent the 2 hours of labor for the year. Don't be surprised if less cars are torn down throughout the year besides at Indy. They just don't have the money to waste on paying someone hourly to police our cars. They'll do it for Indy to keep pulling us saps in. Think About it. If they don't at Indy (all racers/NHRA pride and joy race) then they'll lose even more integrity with the Stock and SS racers and then we'll end up going elsewhere or back to bracket racing locally.

442OLDS 07-26-2009 09:42 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by treessavoy (Post 131692)
Dear Mr. NHRA,

1964 belvedre's NEVER came with the 273 so dropping the HP to 166 didn't help at all! That combination wasn't available until 1965!

Not sure about the 442 CID 1970 Olds.Never heard of that combo either!


Stock Horsepower No Changes


OEM NHRA

Make CID HP HP Years Affected


Olds 442 370 360 70 W/auto

X-TECH MAN 07-27-2009 04:35 AM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mannymen (Post 131699)
NHRA only has $16 in their AFHS/HP Factoring budget and it looks like they spent the 2 hours of labor for the year. Don't be surprised if less cars are torn down throughout the year besides at Indy. They just don't have the money to waste on paying someone hourly to police our cars. They'll do it for Indy to keep pulling us saps in. Think About it. If they don't at Indy (all racers/NHRA pride and joy race) then they'll lose even more integrity with the Stock and SS racers and then we'll end up going elsewhere or back to bracket racing locally.

Dosent matter.....most of you will put up with whatever they (NHRA) does or dosent do anyway.

mannymen 07-27-2009 11:25 AM

Re: new HP factors
 
X Tech Man I just finished my SS'er to race SS/BA/CA and I've already bought my delay box, so I can go back to the bracket classes. I'm having a very hard time passing on races like the ($398 for a 5k/10k/50k/10k) Mid Mich race and 2500/5k/5K No Box challenge at Norwalk to go to 3 day divisionals and 3-4 day nat events.

I'll make an offer to anyone. I just want one class win trophy (Bye run or not). All you have to is dump in our heads up run and I'll cover the cost of your entry fee to the event:) Any takers:)

Tim Kish 07-27-2009 02:47 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mannymen (Post 131798)
X Tech Man I just finished my SS'er to race SS/BA/CA and I've already bought my delay box, so I can go back to the bracket classes. I'm having a very hard time passing on races like the ($398 for a 5k/10k/50k/10k) Mid Mich race and 2500/5k/5K No Box challenge at Norwalk to go to 3 day divisionals and 3-4 day nat events.

I'll make an offer to anyone. I just want one class win trophy (Bye run or not). All you have to is dump in our heads up run and I'll cover the cost of your entry fee to the event:) Any takers:)

Cheaper just ot buy your Wally on ebay

Ed Fernandez 07-27-2009 02:58 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mannymen (Post 131798)
X Tech Man I just finished my SS'er to race SS/BA/CA and I've already bought my delay box, so I can go back to the bracket classes. I'm having a very hard time passing on races like the ($398 for a 5k/10k/50k/10k) Mid Mich race and 2500/5k/5K No Box challenge at Norwalk to go to 3 day divisionals and 3-4 day nat events.

I'll make an offer to anyone. I just want one class win trophy (Bye run or not). All you have to is dump in our heads up run and I'll cover the cost of your entry fee to the event:) Any takers:)

I bet you would put it out for anyone to see and brag how you beat Tony Schumacher for it..I think
you're more suited for bracket racing.


http://cgi.ebay.com/NHRA-Wally-Troph...d=p3286.c0.m14

There you go the big one 1998 Indy class win.Only bid so far up to $202.A bargain.

Jeff Lee 07-27-2009 03:07 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
And what do you tell your children about this trophy?

KEN BUGAJ 07-27-2009 03:20 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by art leong (Post 131547)
They changed them when I got hit and nobody noticed either

Art,
That's because you and Ray were way to FAST !!! (lol)

Ed Fernandez 07-27-2009 03:29 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Just noticed,the seller is a list member.Why would anyone sell a Wally,especially an Indy class one?
I have all mine,except the last one.My daughter took it home and said she would watch it for me.
I happen to think they're special.Especially the one I got in 2006 for a div. win.Like Charlton Heston
famously said"They'de had to pry it from my dead cold hand".

That Wally went for $356.Aint inflation something.

Ed Fernandez 07-27-2009 03:31 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by KEN BUGAJ (Post 131858)
Art,
That's because you and Ray were way to FAST !!! (lol)

Artie,remember at the scales,I was the one that told you that you went 2.00 under?What did you expect,
a ticker tape parade down the return road?LOL

Alan Roehrich 07-27-2009 05:02 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by George Fitzpatrick (Post 131480)
In less than 18 months that combo (70/ 71 challenger /cuda 426 Hemi) was hit with over 27 hp or 215 IBS. So yes the reduction was deserved. It should have been more. This combo was killed. Even now rated @ 445 the car weights in @ 3730 with driver in A/SA. Don’t know the olds situation so can’t comment.

I really don't see how it should be rated any less than the ZL-1 or the L-88.

james schaechter 07-27-2009 06:30 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
See Below

George Fitzpatrick 07-27-2009 07:13 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 131881)
I really don't see how it should be rated any less than the ZL-1 or the L-88.

Never said it should be less than any combo, just that the reduction was deserved.

442OLDS 07-27-2009 07:21 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by George Fitzpatrick (Post 131910)
Never said it should be less than any combo, just that the reduction was deserved.

I am just curious as to what is required for a combination to deserve a horsepower reduction?
I know what the criteria is for an increase.What is the criteria for a decrease?

Alan Roehrich 07-27-2009 07:47 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by George Fitzpatrick (Post 131910)
Never said it should be less than any combo, just that the reduction was deserved.

I agree it was deserved, I actually suggested it to several at NHRA.

You commented on how heavy it was at 445, I figured 445 is pretty close, considering the L-88 is at 440, and the ZL-1 is at 445.

George Fitzpatrick 07-28-2009 06:44 AM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 131929)
I agree it was deserved, I actually suggested it to several at NHRA.

You commented on how heavy it was at 445, I figured 445 is pretty close, considering the L-88 is at 440, and the ZL-1 is at 445.

I believe 440 would have been the right HP rating. I’m not comparing combo’s just concerned with mine as we all are. Don’t want an unfair advantage just to be competitive. Let’s remember where it was @430 then 436, then 442 and a whopping 457 in less than 18 months. With the exception of Fred’s car the combos were not dominating just competitive there’s always one car in the combo that’s faster then the rest (Joe Sorensen). Then what happens bang 27 HP later you park the combo. It’s to late for me I have decided to convert it back to a street car. The AHFS has no wiggle room it’s just black and white with no gray area.

Frank Bialas 07-28-2009 08:52 AM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by George Fitzpatrick (Post 131976)
I believe 440 would have been the right HP rating. I’m not comparing combo’s just concerned with mine as we all are. Don’t want an unfair advantage just to be competitive. Let’s remember where it was @430 then 436, then 442 and a whopping 457 in less than 18 months. With the exception of Fred’s car the combos were not dominating just competitive there’s always one car in the combo that’s faster then the rest (Joe Sorensen). Then what happens bang 27 HP later you park the combo. It’s to late for me I have decided to convert it back to a street car. The AHFS has no wiggle room it’s just black and white with no gray area.

I know the feeling, of the 6-pak cars running out there most run the E-body combo which is rated @ 405HP and of the handful running the B-body rated @ 417HP it's tough to be competitive, in a heads-up with a CHEVY-396/400 or FORD-428/355 I'M DEAD !!!!!!!
I KNOW WORK HARDER!!!!! or GO FISHING!!!!!

X-TECH MAN 07-28-2009 09:54 AM

Re: new HP factors
 
I always thought that having the same engine rated different because of the body it was in was B.S. There are to many variables involved such as track conditions, air, altitude, engine builder, driver, etc. Hell....even some tracks are downhill.

WRENCH 07-30-2009 09:18 PM

Re: new HP factors
 
Who the heck is doing the factoring ????????? When it was done before you did not have to wait for ever for it to come out . Now they just take their old time . Who ever did it before seemed to do it fair and not just take numbers out of thin air . Am I the only one who thinks this way???? Well what will be will be . We will just have to go with it

bsa633 07-31-2009 07:52 AM

Re: new HP factors
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN (Post 132013)
I always thought that having the same engine rated different because of the body it was in was B.S. There are to many variables involved such as track conditions, air, altitude, engine builder, driver, etc. Hell....even some tracks are downhill.

Hmmm lets see here..lets take a 99 Pontiac(R.I.P) firebird ..
Ram air with stick is NHRA-rated at 342..now lets move on to same with non fresh air ...that one is 7 more at 349.(they did a lousy job with the fresh air package)...moving on to auto with non fresh air wich is another 20 hp up at 369..(those stick shifts arent really efficient..)again moving on to the top of the line...auto with fresh air...lets see..that package dont work as good on the track for some reason..so leave that at -5 = 364...hmm..all this makes perfect sence to me...NOT!!! ...this is so stupid that there is no word for it!...on top of that "Formula" and "Trans Am" will put them in different classes also

with all that said...a formula with LS1 fresh air and a stick shift trans must be one of the best cars out there at only 342..a whopping 27 hp lower than one with auto and "non fresh air"...dont understand why not more are using this combo!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.