Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Amazing that the Pro Stockers said, " naw, we don't care what you say about the track, we're not racing on it right now"....is this unprecedented or just more fallout from the Phoenix fiasco this year?
Maybe we should say, "naw, we're not running at 8:00 on a cold track or after alcohol", yea right... |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Interesting.
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Very interesting! Jim
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
I was watching on espn3.com and Anderson was interviewed and he said that NHRA had decided not to spray the track past the 1,000' mark... The first two pairs were out of shape and that's when they stopped round 1... They just finished the round so they must have gotten it sprayed....
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
The reason they don't spray past 1000' is that it supposedly makes the fuel cars chunk tires when they shut down.
My question is do they spray past 1000' during qualifying? Why weren't they having trouble then? |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Messed up my own thread...hate when that happens
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Perhaps everyone should read the Pro driver reactions....Graham Light's reaction is similar to a certain division director's remarks when stockers were hesitant to go out on a very cold track at one of the Divisional races....."go race on it or go home; I don't care".... This attitude combined with racers with heads outside the cage checking their opponent, untightened belts and such ultimately spells disaster.
http://www.competitionplus.com/index...attle-incident |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
All th NHRA management cares about is top fuel and funny car. The whole bunch is incompetent and greedy. They are ruining the organization and are going to walk away with lots of money and nothing left for the rest of us. Everyone should demand change, from the pro's to the sportsmen to the track operators. You can't continue to operate in the manner they are doing and expect results that are good for the organization. The NHRA's first and foremost obligation is to provide a safe place to race.
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
I was watching on ESPN3.com. They made an announcement that the Pro Stockers would be invited back to complete R1 if they wanted to. If not they had two winners from the first two pair and would bring them back to run the final round if necessary. WJ just ripped NHRA, again, on there also.
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Warren's my hero. :D
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
My hero too.
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Did WJ say anything more than what was reported above? He is the man!! Call it like you see it. Man, I wish Buster was still here....
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
remember on the old nhra decals it said "dedicated to safety" guess its off the currenet decals cause they really dont give sh..
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
There is a small town local racing radio show. They talk about NASCAR mainly, but even those guys made a comment about how greedy NHRA was in cutting out the 1320 foot track prep for the Prostock cars.
It is really time to fire anyone above Division level at Glendora and start over. New blood with a love for Drag racing and a basic I.Q. test to get a job. These guys in Glendora forgot they are an association! |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Jim you are right on the money. Close the offices in California and sell the property. Move everything to Indy, build a new building on the property at raceway park. Give the div. offices more responsibility and dramatically downsize the central office. Pay the president around 250k and make the board consists of racers both pro and sportsman, track operators and industry folks. Make the organization accountable to it's members. The present management and board is interested in one thing and one thing only, money. And I don't mean money to make the organization better I mean money for themselves.
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
now that is right on the money ,greg!!!!
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Their departure could be hastened by a lack of support from the racing community.The Pro Stock guys and many Sportsman racers are pissed off at them already.If they get the
rest of the Pros mad enough something might shake them out of their tree. It might mean the end of NHRA as we know it.But the tracks will still be there and if someone committed to running it like a racing organization,not Barnum and Bailey's Circus,there could be a new start to drag racing.Fantasy,but you never know Who woulda thought Communism would collapse in Russia,or the USA hockey team would whip the big,bad Russians,twice. |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Anything less than Nitro will never make Glendora cave in without a huge lawsuit. You guys think you can stick together enough to file a suit?
From the looks of the Sportsman parking lot waiting to get in at Seattle in Toby Lang's pictures I'd say you got a tough row to hoe. |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
They can't run a pro only show. If so, they would have done it years ago. The only power they have is the power the racers give them. It doesn't take a huge law suit or the racers banding together to bring a little sunshine to this outfit.
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
But unfortunately,you're more likely to hit the Power Ball lottery,at 75million to 1 odds. Correct me if I'm wrong Brucie. |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
1996 Columbus, scheduled for mid-June. The race was rained out. The week after, they ran the four Pro classes, Top Alcohol and Comp. The downtime was filled with NMCA Pro Street cars (Tom Hammond and Mark Tate were two, if i recall correctly), and some other exhibition stuff. Stk, S/S and the three .90 classes ran their Columbus race off the week after Indy. So it could be done, if they had something for the downtime.
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
Think corporate structure. There are several classes of membership. They would be hard pressed to totally exclude participant members; unless they decide to commit what amounts to corporate suicide. |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
I would think they could charge for spectator parking (including motor homes) where we normally pit.
I'm not saying it would be easy for them just a possibility. If we were all just not to enter. |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
NHRA's only bargaining chip is the contracts they have with all the tracks around the country.If they lose the tracks they are dead meat. |
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
I know, Ed. I was using them as a previous example. NHRA could use anything as a time-killer. Jets, wheelstanders, heads-up door cars, etc etc etc.
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
Quote:
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
any more news about the track?
|
Re: Seattle - First Round of Pro Stock...
The only way to improve our position is if NHRA loses it's grip on their sanctioned tracks.Those contracts kepps other venues that compete with NHRA at bay.Notice that Christianson is now affiliated with NHRA?He was a threat to them.to lessen the threat they
merged their resource with his popularity.In short,if you want to race at an NHRA affiliated track,and you are a threat to NHRA,you pay up or go somewhere else.That's their strenght period. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.