Roller rockers
I saw on here once before IHRA allows roller rockers in Stock. Are you allowed to run FULL roller rockers or just roller tips? Is this just for crate motors or all?
|
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
|
Re: Roller rockers
Thanks Terry,
|
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
|
Re: Roller rockers
Dear Marv,
If you want to use roller rockers, NHRA will let you. You can also put in a roller cam and an aluminum intake manifold and you can even use a transbrake valve body in the trans. They call it SUPER STOCK. You have to be careful what you wish for, you might wake up one morning and find out that your stocker can only run in Super Stock. Since Indy in 1985, when over a dozen stockers got bounced from tech for improper valve spring pressure, the stocker rules have been diluted and corrupted from the original concept and pushed closer to Super Stock rules. Unlimited cam duration, any valve job,beehive valve springs with unlimited valve pressure, non factory lifters all used to be Super Stock only items, now found on every stocker that can afford them. I know we can't go back to the old rules but roller rockers in stockers will just put one more nail in Stock Eliminator's coffin. Call me when you get a chance. John |
Re: Roller rockers
Marv I agree & having an Olds I understand how this simple change could fix a pis poor factory set-up. I'm sure the big block Chevy guys would love it too.
|
Re: Roller rockers
I'm not having any rocker trouble. I'm not wanting roller rockers in Stock.
|
Re: Roller rockers
Greg, at least the BB Chevy guys can get good aftermarket replacement parts for their valvetrains (hardened rockers, better metals, etc.). Trying to find or engineer stuff that works on your own can cost a fortune on a combo that's not mainstream.
|
Re: Roller rockers
John, you forgot about aluminum heads, 4-link & coilovers, wheel tubs, big tires, little seats, motor plates, etc. It costs a lot more to setup an SS car that's competitive... not looking for power edge (at least not with repl rockers) just parts that won't break and don't cost a mint (and can be found). OH! wait a minute.... these are RACE cars -- NOTHING is cheap!!! ..... LOL
|
Re: Roller rockers
|
Re: Roller rockers
No mainstream combo and no rocker troubles here.Leave it alone.
|
Re: Roller rockers
Stump pullers don't need high rpm. Tray lifters $28.00 Sealed Power selected rockers with three piece steel pivots $68.00 CP Products valve springs $48.00 ----150 seat 350 open. Perfect machine and assembly.
|
Re: Roller rockers
What is considered extreme valve spring pressure in a stocker?
|
Re: Roller rockers
Some of the composite lifter engines have moderate roller-type pressures. They even recommend starting at 170-180 closed on the seat.
|
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
|
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
|
Re: Roller rockers
Hi Terry------You're dead on. Worst rule change ever. Started all this BS.
|
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
|
Re: Roller rockers
Hi Terry---I'm still working in Va. with a connection to Jensen Beach for the past 15 years. Wish I was down there with you full time but still have family obligations. I'm afraid class racing will never get back to what we grew up with and love. Too much work for the new sanctioning bodies run by bean counters and not people like you and Farmer. Majority of the class racers are eligable for Social Security and still racing the cars they bought new. As Macarthur said, like the old soldier, "They'l just fade away". As for me I'm putting my ( bought new ) Black 66W30 2dr post together for D/S . So find yourself something to race ( 4 speed of course ) and Craig and I will come to an association race down ther and try to wear your ***** out. Then fry up some burgers and dogs and drink alot of beer. :)
|
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
Terry |
Re: Roller rockers
My AMX in D/S had 450#'s open pressure when it was running 10.50's. And I know some guys (multi-makes) running around 480#'s nowadays.
I shifted mine at 6800 RPM, not something I would call "extreme", went through the traps about the same. Broke rockers all the time. Coated them, cryo'd them, ARP 7/16" studs (AMC is like a SBC rocker assembly) best fix was adjust valves every two to three runs. Guide plates & unlimited style valve spring were not legal at the time. If I were doing it again I would try 7/16" dual taper pushrods with guide plates & a double (triple?) spring. Some would say the cam profile was wrong. I don't know, had about a half-dozen in the car over the years, all custom grinds. Didn't break rockers too often until the spring pressures got up to 420. But then again the car got faster with the cam and springs. Now when you look at it, NHRA will allow $1000 billet or tool steel cam cores, $800 Schubeck lifters (that may take out your engine) or tool steel lifters, they'll allow $600 push rods, they will allow beehive or ANY valve spring you want (neither allowed when I ran Stock) that can approach $500 a set, stainless valves, $750+ BBC 8.2L rockers with the whammy treatment and 1/2" rocker studs....but it would be ridiculous to allow $279 Crane Gold roller rockers that would live with the rest of the valve train! :rolleyes: |
Re: Roller rockers
But Jeff their not "stock" (unless you have an LT4 vette) besides we get enough sticker money why would we want to get it for rocker rams?
|
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
|
Re: Roller rockers
In regards to the solid lifters being an issue: How is it that bracket racers are running near .680 -.700 lift mechanical cams and not breaking lifters???
The factory rocker arms with the higher spring pressures I understand, but the lifters I don't. A very good friend of mine was running a custom (BBC) high lift mechanical/solid cam from Crower and never had any issues with his$100 set of lifters breaking. He would easily get 400 passes on them shifting in the mid 7k range. |
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
|
Re: Roller rockers
Quote:
Likewise, my 3160+ weight stocker with .457" maximum lift cam and a little 600 CFM Autolite carb can beat most Dominator equipped .700" lift engines which weigh 300 #'s less. Of course that's part of the fun... |
Re: Roller rockers
One of my favorite things to discuss is cryogenic processing. I love when someone tells me I tried that a couple years ago and it didn't work. Well, a couple years ago you ran your computer with dos.....cryogenic processing ain't what it use to be! Additionally, all cryo is not the same! There are new machines,(very important), new programing available, and unlimited control over the process. Some new machines never directly expose the parts to the liquid nitrogen. It even has cause some manufactures to say their parts are already cryo'd. OK, but was it done correctly? Ask what machine was used, old it is, and how long did the process take. Ask questions. ( you can't cryo a part, correctly, in less than 3 days -72 hours-).We've developed programs that have eliminated roller lifter breakage in Pro Stock, eliminated valve spring breakage, eliminated timing chain stretch, and done a very good job with rear end gears and stock stamped steel rockers, among other parts that fail. I will tell you that dry ice in a bucket isn't used, and that all parts are treated with different programs, and, I can make your high speed drill bits last 10 times longer - guaranteed. JB.
|
Re: Roller rockers
All very good points Jim!
|
Re: Roller rockers
Mr. Bailey, i think is right on target with cryogenics done properly it works very well. ive also used the metaltt lax process . what i like about metal lax is before you treat the part it gives you a graph showing how tight the grain structure is before you start, then what it is after a cycle. i know on titanium it machines better and holds up longer. for example, titanium rods in a sprint car used to change , every 2 weeks. after metal lax , 6 weeks without breaking one. anyone else on this?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.