CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   "Kepner went Kaboom" (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=38520)

boster 01-25-2012 11:55 AM

"Kepner went Kaboom"
 
LMAO , is all I can say

CHRYSLER-FORD-GENERAL MOTORS

Cadillac CTS-V

Coupe (6.2L/378.2ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man/a; 4217lbs; 556 bhp; MSRP $66,690)

Chevrolet Camaro

COPO (5.3L/323.4ci SC V8; FE; RWD; man/a; N/A lbs; N/A bhp; MSRP unknown)

COPO (7.9L/482.0ci NA V8; FE; RWD; man/a; N/A lbs; N/A bhp; MSRP unknown)

ZL1 (6.2L/378.2ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 4120lbs; 580 bhp; MSRP $54,095)

SS (6.2L/378.2ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3860lbs; 426 bhp; MSRP $31,850)

Chevrolet Corvette

ZR1 (6.2L/378.2ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3353lbs; 638 bhp; MSRP $111,600)

Z06 (7.0L/427.0ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3199lbs; 505 bhp; MSRP $75,600)

Dodge Challenger

DP10 (8.4L/512.0ci NA V10; FE; RWD; 2sp auto; 3250lbs; 600 bhp; MSRP $85,512)

SRT8 (6.4L/390.5ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 4170lbs; 470 bhp; MSRP $43,995)

SRT8 (6.1L/372.2ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 6sp auto; 4132lbs; 425 bhp; MSRP $41,230)

SRT8 (5.7L/347.8ci NA V8; FE; RWD; man/auto; 4089lbs; 405 bhp; MSRP $41,230)

Dodge Charger

SRT8 (6.4L/390.5ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 5sp auto; 4340lbs; 470 bhp; MSRP $46,825)

Stage3 (7.0L/426.0ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 5sp auto; 4381lbs; 540 bhp; MSRP unknown)

HO (7.0L/426.0ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 5sp auto; 4381lbs; 590 bhp; MSRP unknown)

Dodge Viper

SRT10 (8.7L/530.8ci NA V10; FE; RWD; 6sp man; N/A lbs; N/A bhp; MSRP unknown)

SRT8 (6.4L/530.8ci NA V10; FE; RWD; 6sp man; N/A lbs; N/A bhp; MSRP unknown)

Ford Mustang

500CJ (5.4L/329.5ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3200lbs; 550 bhp; MSRP $91,990)

(2.3L TVS2300 Supercharger Only)

GT500 (5.4L/329.5ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3820lbs; 550 bhp; MSRP $53,810)

Stage3 (5.0L/353.0cici SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3580lbs; 540 bhp; MSRP $59,945)

5XR (5.0L/342.0ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3681lbs; 525 bhp; MSRP $51,277)

Roush (4.6L/280.6ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3316lbs; 540 bhp; MSRP $55,218)

Roush (4.6L/280.6ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3845lbs; 436 bhp; MSRP $49,017)

P-51 (4.6L/280.6ci SC V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3845lbs; 436 bhp; MSRP $49,017)

Boss (4.9L/302.0ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3632lbs; 444 bhp; MSRP $40,310)

GT (4.9L/302.0ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man; 3632lbs; 412 bhp; MSRP $34,710)


GLOBAL SUPERCARS

Aston Martin

One-77 (7.3L/445.4ci NA V12; FE; RWD, 6sp man; 3594 lbs; 760 bhp; MSRP $2,600,000)

Vantage 12 (5.97L/360.0ci NA V12; FE; RWD, 6sp man; 3704 lbs; 510 bhp; MSRP $182,450)

Vantage 8 (4.7L/445.4ci NA V8; FE; RWD, 7sp man; 3549 lbs; 430 bhp; MSRP $138,000)

Audi

R8 GT (5.2L/317.3ci NA V10; ME; AWD, 6sp auto; 3450 lbs; 560 bhp; MSRP $196,800)

Bavarian Motor Works (BMW)

X6M (4.4L/384.4ci TT V8; FE; AWD, 6sp auto; 5247 lbs; 555 bhp; MSRP $90,395)

760Li (6.0L/366.1ci TT V12; FE; AWD, 8sp auto; 5026 lbs; 535 bhp; MSRP $137,300)

Bentley

SuperSports (6.0L/366.1ci TT W12; FE; AWD, 6sp auto; 4940 lbs; 621 bhp; MSRP $291,900)

Bugatti

Veyron SS (8.0L/488.1ci QT V16; ME; AWD, 7sp man; 4162 lbs; 1184 bhp; MSRP $2,700,000)

Ferrari

GTO (5.9L/365.9ci NA V12; ME; RWD; 6sp man; 3721lbs; 671 bhp; MSRP $383,500)

Hyundai

Equus (5.0L/305.2ci NA V8; FE; RWD, 8sp auto; 4525 lbs; 429 bhp; MSRP $65,750)

Lamborghini

Aventador (6.5L/396.5ci NA V12; ME; E4WD, 6sp s-auto; 3470 lbs; 690 bhp; MSRP $379,700)

Gallardo (5.2L/317.6ci NA V10; ME; E4WD, 6sp s-auto; 2954 lbs; 561 bhp; MSRP $237,600)

Lexus

LFA (4.8L/292.8ci NA V10; FE; RWD, 6sp s-auto; 3483 lbs; 552 bhp; MSRP $375,200)

Maserati

Quattroporte (4.7L/286.7ci NA V8; FE; RWD; 6sp man/a; 4147lbs; 433 bhp; MSRP $123,290)

Maybach

57S (6.0L/366.1ci TT V12; FE; RWD, 5sp auto; 6030 lbs; 620 bhp; MSRP $412,000)

McLaren

MP4-12C (3.8L/231.8ci TT V8; ME; RWD, 7sp man; 3084 lbs; 592 bhp; MSRP $229,000)

Mercedes-Benz

SLS AMG (6.3L/384.4ci NA V8; FE; RWD, 7sp s-auto; 3571 lbs; 563 bhp; MSRP $196,100)

CLS63 AMG (5.5L/335.6ci TT V8; FE; RWD, 7sp s-auto; 4277 lbs; 518 bhp; MSRP $113,380)

C63 AMG (6.2L/378.2ci NA V8; FE; RWD, 7sp man; 3924 lbs; 451 bhp; MSRP $174,175)

Nissan

GT-R PE (3.8L/231.8ci TT V6; FE; AWD; 6sp man; 3829lbs; 530 bhp; MSRP $89,850)

Porsche

Panamera (4.8L/292.8ci TT V8; FE; AWD, 7sp man; 4398 lbs; 550 bhp; MSRP $174,175)

911 GT2 RS (3.8L/231.8ci TT O6; RE; AWD, 7sp man; 3494 lbs; 530 bhp; MSRP $220,320)

Cayenne (4.8L/292.8ci TT V8; FE; AWD, 7sp man; 4784 lbs; 500 bhp; MSRP $107,100)

911 S (3.8L/231.8ci NA O6; RE; RWD, 7sp man; 3120 lbs; 400 bhp; MSRP $96,400)

goinbroke2 01-25-2012 12:27 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Just read about what you were talking about...interesting.

tj310 01-25-2012 01:08 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Hopefully the three stooges :D:o:) from top gear will show up.---Trevor

Hemi Moose 01-25-2012 04:20 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
I can see this thing becoming a 'worldwide muscle car series' if they play their cards right...I guess this means a lot more roll bars will be needed for all those Ferrari & Bugatti's entering the series huh, lol. ;)

...oh and by the way here's the link.

http://www.adrl.us/2012/01/adrl%E2%8...und-the-globe/

.

Billy Nees 01-25-2012 07:40 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Hey Bo, in Kepners defense, there's a lot of combos in the NHRA guide that never get built. So what, it looks good in print.

boster 01-25-2012 08:41 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Billy I would agree . Only thing is if the some of these combination show up they can be real fast and you cant factor that to start . It just seems like a joke to me .

Wonder why they left out the Jaguar R series or for that mater the Lotus , Twin Turbo Mini Copper , Saleens ect . Either its real racing or it's just BS

If its going to be a super car series make it that . If it going to be factory made race cars from the big 3 make it that . If its going to be factory built race cars from any manufacture make it that .

It wont be fair with factory built race cars vs high dollars street cars . The street cars will have the upper hand with traction control and dial up your own boost just to name a few items.

SuperCompDiv3 01-25-2012 09:31 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
The amazing thing is comparing these HP numbers with the same cars 15 years ago. Technology is has made these cars amazingly fast.

Bret Kepner 01-26-2012 12:13 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
I promise I won't interfere with your dialogue on the subject but I feel the need to point out the list whch appeared in the January 24 press release, (the same which is posted in this thread), represents only some of the many combinations which COULD be used. It is not a list of the only eligible vehicles. It's merely a sample of the production cars available which offer engines of more than four hundred factory-rated horsepower.

As stated in the release, there are many more combinations out there than those listed.

Carry on.


Oh, by the way...

http://www.competitionplus.com/drag-...g-racing-again

boster 01-26-2012 01:27 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Bret , when will the list be complete ? I think you will get a lot of guys wanting to race the super cars . If I show up with a GT40 at the first race would it be allowed to race . What about the Hennesy line of super cars and Callaway super car ? There are a ton of cars in Dupont Regestry that are super cars that are not on the list . Thank you for your thoughts and at least trying to get some heads up racing going.

Bret Kepner 01-26-2012 07:46 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Ummm...Ford hasn't made a GT 40 in FORTY THREE YEARS.

If you meant a GT, they haven't made one of those in SIX years.

Billy Nees 01-26-2012 08:47 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Hey Bret, if the ADRL is going to mine deep pockets (they do), then they might as well give those deep pockets some mind candy to think about. It sounds like "International Pro Stock" to me and I'd watch it.
No response necessary.

boster 01-26-2012 09:13 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
1 Attachment(s)
Bret , you are correct technically, Ford has not made one in 40 years . But GT40 clone cars are still being produced today and are referred to as "super cars" . Are you saying that you cant race clones or that there is a cut off date on production ?

As far as Super cars go I might have a few that qualify . In my garage I have a 2012 B7 Alpina Bi Turbo 586 hp with chip and tuning , 2002 Jaguar XJR 100 (Anniversary edition) upgrade supercharged ,tuning chip and race suspension , 2002 Lingenfelter Supercharged Z06 corvette , roll cage , line lock , rear hard shafts , 411 gears and drag tuned suspension , 2007 stock Z06

I also have a Gen3 LS motor just laying around that will run 5.70's in a 3250 corvette if needed . UMMM !!!

http://www.gt40spf.com/gt40-specifications.aspx

http://www.superformance.com/gt40.aspx

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ud1q...ayer_embedded#!

Michael Beard 01-26-2012 10:57 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 305787)
"International Pro Stock"

That idea is so 1999... ;) (and I may still have the proposal laying around in my files somewhere!) Ironically, some conversation on DRR recently led to revisting the concepts surrounding Spec Dragster as well... You're barely more than a decade ahead of the times. :p

SSGN 01-26-2012 11:07 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Is it April 1st or just winter?looked good at first.

Kevin

boster 01-26-2012 02:40 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
In looking over the spec on most of these "super cars" they all have traction control . Does that mean the class will allow traction control?

Jeff Lee 01-26-2012 02:54 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
I need to buy stock in whatever Italian or German transmission and rear-end manufacturer's will be supplying those replacement parts Bo is talking about. A launch with slicks to be competitive in ET will destroy these parts. And euro-trashmaster's will not install G-force transmissions and 9" Fords, even if the class rules did allow conversions.
So what you want Bo is the chance to compete with a super HP car that can MPH like the wind but is embarrassingly slow on ET compared to the MPH.
What's the point?

boster 01-26-2012 06:25 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Jeff it this simple , Let a Cajun (V10 viper) have a car with traction control listed in the guide and he will run it sooner or later . Same thing applies to me , let me run a Z06 corvette that has factory traction control and I will run it . Me and the Cajun both have cars that can run 9in slicks and g force transmissions.

Jeff as I'm sure you know their are a lot of corvette's with irs running in nhra stock eliminator and winning races .

Jeff if you allow a stock camaro to run and the copo camaro to run why would you not allow 9in conversion's for other car's . I think you have heard of purpose built race cars

P.S That Cajan is real smart and knows more about racing then anyone I know

Randall Klein 01-26-2012 07:56 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
This thing is going South earlier than I had predicted. It just takes a few with deep pockets and desire to dominate to regulate the masses to spectators (or sacrificial lambs)

442OLDS 01-26-2012 08:04 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Randall Klein (Post 305881)
This thing is going South earlier than I had predicted. It just takes a few with deep pockets and desire to dominate to regulate the masses to spectators (or sacrificial lambs)

I think it can be really successful,but it has to be done as entertainment.

It could be a good "show",without serious competition.lol

X-TECH MAN 01-26-2012 08:08 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Randall Klein (Post 305881)
This thing is going South earlier than I had predicted. It just takes a few with deep pockets and desire to dominate to regulate the masses to spectators (or sacrificial lambs)

LOL....Welcome to all to the real world.

dennismopar73 01-26-2012 09:39 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
big money game already!

Jason 01-26-2012 10:02 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
It won't take long for a few purpose built drag race Mustangs and DPs (that can never be licensed for the street) to run off all the exotic foreign jobs.

BTW there are sure a lot of American cars on the list that will never get to race in Stock or S/S 'cause they are not in the classguide. What a shame!

boster 01-26-2012 10:59 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Jason , dont rule out Corvette's , Vipers and Camaro's . These are very fast car's that could dominate a heads up series and have a ton of technolgy that the CJ's and DP's dont have

RJ Sledge 01-27-2012 11:54 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Sounds to me like its having a few issues about even making it to the "Inaugural" Kick off of Top Stock. I thought it would last for at least 6 months or so. I have a lot of respect for Bret, Jeff and anybody else who is involed in getting this thing to the table, but I bet their eyes rolled back in their heads when they got the "approved list" of vehicles that were invited.

Does ADRL even have a Tech Dept?? What a nightmare, Huh? Run Whatcha Brung!!!!

Good Luck Boys!!

RJ

bubski 01-27-2012 07:27 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 305924)
Jason , dont rule out Corvette's , Vipers and Camaro's . These are very fast car's that could dominate a heads up series and have a ton of technolgy that the CJ's and DP's dont have

Didn't all the CJs and DPs have a ton of technology unavailable to the stockers that they were meant to prey on?. You thought it was fair then! Now the bellyaching begins, looks like this will be put out to pasture before any rules or classes are even written.

boster 01-27-2012 09:22 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Bubski , No Tears here. I own a race ready corvette with traction control . I also have a bad *** Patterson peice to go in it that has not been able to run in NHRA because the vette would have to weight 4200lbs in stock. Now it only has to weight 3250 with driver .

Im happy and yes I will proudly use the rules to my advanage if I can just like the other guys who run heads up racing. I just want to make sure what the rules are so I can use them all to my full advantage.

FYI , the CJ's and DP's are not even close to the vette and viper when it comes to technolgy .

The current factory drag cars were made to out run the out dated cars that run NHRA stock. And I would add the CJ's and DP's have done it well

The ADRL is starting a whole new game with adding "super cars" to the field. At first I did not like it because they gave the mopars a
weight break , now it's looking better and better to me

SSGN 01-27-2012 09:34 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 306089)
Bubski , No Tears here. I own a race ready corvette with traction control . I also have a bad *** Patterson peice to go in it that has not been able to run in NHRA because the vette would have to weight 4200lbs in stock. Now it only has to weight 3250 with driver .

Im happy and yes I will proudly use the rules to my advanage if I can just like the other guys who run heads up racing. I just want to make sure what the rules are so I can use them all to my full advantage.

FYI , the CJ's and DP's are not even close to the vette and viper when it comes to technolgy .

The current factory drag cars were made to out run the out dated cars that run NHRA stock. And I would add the CJ's and DP's have done it well

The ADRL is starting a whole new game with adding "super cars" to the field. At first I did not like it because they gave the mopars a
weight break , now it's looking better and better to me

While you are correct in all the above Bo,do you think with all these potential cars any sanction could police it?Will they have a teardown barn??It looked real good at first.Don't get me wrong my Buicks would not be a player in this class so i am only watching.Seems these things get squashed before the game even starts.

Kevin

RULER 01-27-2012 09:48 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Looks like the same thing that happened to IHRA Top Stock will end up being the end of this class also, By the same Folks that killed it. Can't anybody just race the way it was intended!!!!!!

Evan Smith 01-28-2012 01:40 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Bubski, what is the "ton" of technology unavailable to other stockers that you speak of?

KRatcliff 01-28-2012 02:25 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Evan Smith (Post 306179)
Bubski, what is the "ton" of technology unavailable to other stockers that you speak of?

CNC ported heads comes to mind.

boster 01-28-2012 03:14 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Ruler , your right it was cheater's and loser like you who could not race on a level playing feild . The same type that dose not have the balls to use their real name. And then tell us what was in ADRL mind when they came up with this series. They are the one who made the rules.

SS Engine Guy 01-28-2012 05:36 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 306089)

The current factory drag cars were made to out run the out dated cars that run NHRA stock. And I would add the CJ's and DP's have done it well


And it took a BS hp factor in order to outrun the "outdated" cars.

I love the chance to run heads up and thank all the people that are working to make this happen!

boster 01-28-2012 06:37 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
SS engine guy , everything about stock is BS . Their is nothing stock about stock elminator and I challenge you to show me one combo that really has the horsepower it's factored at in stock .

When I got my mustang the HP was very close to the rating on the chassis dyno . But you are correct we changed the plugs and pick up 80 hp , dial up the tuning and pick up another 65hp changed the cam's pickup some more . Ford and Mopar just produced a better factory drag car then the ones racing

The old cars run bogus heads that are covered up 60-80hp , change the cams another 60hp , rework the carb , 15 hp cheat on rocker ratio another 25 hp , bogus size rod journals ,lighter weight piston and rods , turned down crank another 100hp .

Now you tell me thats stock ? and thats not bogus ? But it's NHRA legal because the rules say so .

Stock means the way it was produced from the factory not whats runing in NHRA stock elminator

The new car's will always have the advantage in drag racing .Technolgy is hard to beat get use to it .

KRatcliff 01-28-2012 06:47 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 306221)
SS engine guy , everything about stock is BS . Their is nothing stock about stock elminator and I challenge to show me one combo that really has the horsepower it's factored at in stock . Every combo out their is bogus some just more then other's

When I got my mustang the HP was very close to the rating on the chassis dyno . But you are correct we changed the plugs and pick up 80 hp , dial up the tuning and pick up another 65hp changed the cam's pickup some more .

The old cars run bogus heads that are covered up 60-80hp , change the cams another 60hp , rework the carb , 15 hp cheat on rocker ratio another 25 hp , bogus size rod journals ,lighter weight piston and rods , turned down crank another 100hp .

Now you tell me thats stock ? and thats not bogus ? But it's NHRA legal because the rules say so .

Stock means the way it was produced from the factory not whats runing in NHRA stock elminator

The new car's will always have the advantage in drag racing .Technolgy is hard to beat get use to it .

It is not so much the technology differences between a Dragpak or a NA Mustang that has the advantage over my car for example. It is the compression, heads, camshaft lift, valve sizes, ports sizes, throttle body, and intake that are so far from what could run on the street in a "stock" car that makes them a bogus comparison.

There is no way you could take one of those cars and get an emmissions certification on pump gas like you do the traditional stock eliminator cars. There isn't that much more technology in one of those cars over say a LT1 or a LS1, but the main difference is that an LT1 and a LS1 were driven on the street on pump gas.

Let me have similar heads, lift, intake, compression, and throttle body in a LT1 and see if you could keep up with me.

RJ Sledge 01-28-2012 08:07 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Bo

Anyway you can let me know where I can get a set or two of those 80hp Spark Plugs???

RJ

Jeff Teuton 01-28-2012 08:16 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
I am the regional distributor. How much money you got?

Andys dad 01-28-2012 08:36 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff Teuton (Post 306237)
I am the regional distributor. How much money you got?

I will do the west/left coast

:-) peace

RJ Sledge 01-28-2012 08:56 PM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Grey Goose Brand no doubt. Suppose you got a set in your DP, huh??

Do they possibility come in different HP ratings or is 80hp the only ones you sell??

I need some for the 390........you still taking checks??

Your Lame Duck F/SA Competitor

RJ

SS Engine Guy 01-29-2012 12:06 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Bo, you are exactly right! Way to much stuff has been allowed in the past years that should have been a DQ instead of a rule change. However, one of the things that has always held my interest was the fans and other competitors that were amazed that S/SS cars were as quick as they were given the limitations. ie: flat tops or dished pistons, small cams, q-jets/small holleys/afb carbs etc. I can take an old style motor, port the heads, use 1000 cfm air flow, big manifolds, blowers etc. and get the same or better performance as the new cars. Not to mention computer control all of this in milliseconds. Thats no great accomplishment. Especially if my competition is "old school" as many have mentioned. That is exactly why I am thrilled to have Brett and others that are putting the time in to have a "Supercar Series".
These cars will be a great draw running against themselves and should be a boost to the manufacurers and help to sell their product and create public awareness that the car companies are again offering performance.

And you are correct again that there are quite a few other "old" combos out there that have had low hp ratings that have been protected by racers and sanctioning bodies. That needs to be addressed also. And ahfs is not the way to do it as it allows competitors to falsify a combo's true performance potential.

Oh, and I got used to the technology a long time ago. Some really good for our sport and some really bad.

442OLDS 01-29-2012 01:22 AM

Re: "Kepner went Kaboom"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 306221)
bogus size rod journals ,lighter weight piston and rods , turned down crank another 100hp .

Now you tell me thats stock ? and thats not bogus ? But it's NHRA legal because the rules say so .


Legal?

100hp?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.