CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=43869)

SuperCarFan 10-16-2012 08:34 AM

HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
http://www.nhraracer.com/content/gen...075&zoneid=132

SuperCarFan 10-16-2012 08:39 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
The horsepower rating for 75-76 Chevrolet Monza, entries with the 262 cubic inch engine and a factory rating of 110 currently rated at 165 has been increased by six horsepower, to 171 horsepower; for Stock Eliminator.

The horsepower rating for 2012 Chevrolet COPO Camaro, entries with the 327 cubic inch engine and a factory rating of 550 currently rated at 550 has been increased by eighteen horsepower, to 568 horsepower; for Super Stock Eliminator.

The horsepower rating for 2010 Ford Cobra Jet, entries with the 281 cubic inch engine and a factory rating of 235 currently rated at 257 has been increased by nine horsepower, to 266 horsepower; for Stock Eliminator.

Charley Downing 10-16-2012 08:49 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Did the 402 get hp?
I though I saw a sheet from the dutch where that combo went 1.20 under.

larrylomascolo 10-16-2012 09:07 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
2 1209 B/SA Woody Pagano, Watertown CT, '70 Nova 10.040 11.25 -1.210 This pass

SuperCarFan 10-16-2012 09:37 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Charley Downing (Post 352167)
Did the 402 get hp?
I though I saw a sheet from the dutch where that combo went 1.20 under.

The above is all that was listed. Would think they would put all the adjustments out together.

boster 10-16-2012 09:49 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
They are not getting any HP per NHRA tech at the Dutch .
He got a free pass something about wrong heads on car and they were not an advantage????????????????????????????

junior barns 10-16-2012 09:50 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by larrylomascolo (Post 352170)
2 1209 B/SA Woody Pagano, Watertown CT, '70 Nova 10.040 11.25 -1.210 This pass


Is this the alum head or cast head???

Steve Calabro 10-16-2012 10:25 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Steel

Bruce Noland 10-16-2012 10:45 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 352174)
They are not getting any HP per NHRA tech at the Dutch .
He got a free pass something about wrong heads on car and they were not an advantage????????????????????????????

The exhaust valves were too small. So probably not an advantage. It is not a free pass when a racer does not pass tech.

Mickey Whaley 10-16-2012 11:32 AM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruce Noland (Post 352183)
The exhaust valves were too small. So probably not an advantage. It is not a free pass when a racer does not pass tech.

so he got a 1 year vacation?

boster 10-16-2012 12:03 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Bruce I know its a old car but give me a break . 1.20 under get HP if you make a mistake with wrong heads to bad . Its must have been a advantage if he went 1.20 under

Bruce Noland 10-16-2012 12:31 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 352191)
Bruce I know its a old car but give me a break . 1.20 under get HP if you make a mistake with wrong heads to bad . Its must have been a advantage if he went 1.20 under

Well Bo, let's see how fast he is with bigger valves.

TILBURG 10-16-2012 01:09 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Lets get this straight, before every key board engine builder gets their pantie in a twist. First and foremost I F---Ked up plain and simple!!I had done the heads for a 396 and when we switched and made it a 402 I never gave the valves a thought. Till dave measured it ! Yes I f--ked up!This is the reason anything that goes 1.200 under should be torn down.Why should he (or other w/ comb) be hit if his was not legal? BO what if I were to put a different blower or pulley on, and wreck your combo? As far as the guys that call themselves engine builders and want to go around the track saying this and that, JUST maybe if you did your own stuff rather than having it trucked in, then maybe you too would make a mistake once in awhile! Yes I'm sure the big valve will slow it down probably will not be able to run the index:)

Mickey Whaley 10-16-2012 01:46 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
If brian did this motor and tells u what he did wrong u can take it to the bank he is fair and honest!

69Cobra 10-16-2012 02:44 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
I completely agree that every combo that runs fast enough to get hp should be torn down and pass tech. With that said, running 1.2 under with to small of valve would be like running to small of a carburetor. LOL Luckily for him this mistake saved his combo from getting an automatic hit. But will it save it from the review board at the end of the year?

billy leber 10-16-2012 02:46 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley (Post 352208)
If brian did this motor and tells u what he did wrong u can take it to the bank he is fair and honest!

Agreed.

FINESPLINE 10-16-2012 03:23 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Just curiosity ----The wrong size valve being talked about is the exhaust side at 1.72 vs 1.88 as being the 70 402 which used the same head as a 70 LS6. Am I following this correctly ?

SSDiv6 10-16-2012 03:35 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 69Cobra (Post 352212)
I completely agree that every combo that runs fast enough to get hp should be torn down and pass tech. With that said, running 1.2 under with to small of valve would be like running to small of a carburetor. LOL Luckily for him this mistake saved his combo from getting an automatic hit. But will it save it from the review board at the end of the year?

It is not the same philosophy or dynamics.
Also, the intake port does not behave the same way as an intake port.
The Chevy big block exhaust port and valve BBC are already bigger than they need to be.

Due to the lift restrictions in the class, using a smaller valve improves the curtain area by slowing down the flow and velocity.

During scavenging, the pressure recovery is better when the gases expand due to a slower velocity, specifically when you take into account the CID and RPM range limits of the engine.

Therefore, contrary to what many may think, going to a larger exhaust valve may slow down the car.

However, in the case of an intake valve, the rule would be the opposite.

69Cobra 10-16-2012 04:03 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SSDiv6 (Post 352221)
It is not the same philosophy or dynamics.
Also, the intake port does not behave the same way as an intake port.
The Chevy big block exhaust port and valve BBC are already bigger than they need to be.

Due to the lift restrictions in the class, using a smaller valve improves the curtain area by slowing down the flow and velocity.

During scavenging, the pressure recovery is better when the gases expand due to a slower velocity, specifically when you take into account the CID and RPM range limits of the engine.

Therefore, contrary to what many may think, going to a larger exhaust valve may slow down the car.

However, in the case of an intake valve, the rule would be the opposite.

If the smaller valve is indeed the better performer here couldn't you adjust the events of the ex lobe on the cam to get your velocity and scavenging back to where it was?

SS/GSI 10-16-2012 04:37 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mickey Whaley (Post 352189)
so he got a 1 year vacation?

Was there any repercussions, just curious what, if anything, that would warrant???

Larry Hill 10-16-2012 05:12 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Very impressive run using that flat manifold that the 402 came with.

Greg Hill 10-16-2012 05:20 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Larry, be good.

MikeFicacci 10-16-2012 05:29 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Regardless of what happened, the 402 rated at 417 would have been pretty useless kinda like when Henson hit the Mopar a few years back. Better for everyone that it didn't get hit especially being that it raced the "new cars" and the LS1.

SSDiv6 10-16-2012 05:39 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 69Cobra (Post 352224)
If the smaller valve is indeed the better performer here couldn't you adjust the events of the ex lobe on the cam to get your velocity and scavenging back to where it was?

Yes. ;)

I have discussed this in detail in many previous posts... :)

Just to give you something to think about since you are a Ford guy, take as an example the reason why the Ford Cleveland head picks up power when the exhaust port and valve is reduced in size... :)

Jeff Teuton 10-16-2012 05:56 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
New Cars? I must have missed something here. Help me Greg. And to stick to the subject, there will probably be consequences. There ususally is. What manifold Larry?

Crew Chief 10-16-2012 06:45 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Hill (Post 352235)
Very impressive run using that flat manifold that the 402 came with.

The following is found on the NHRA blueprint page for 1970 Chevrolet...

"Intake Manifold 3933163 with an open plenum (divider cut down) is acceptable as of June 6,2002"

Of course we all know that is bogus but what can be said other than the tech department accepted a modified replacement intake.

boster 10-16-2012 07:35 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Tilburg , what I stated is that the rule say 1.20 automatic Hp . I have hit the trigger and got HP . The last time I got HP my roll cage was not legal but I still got HP . I did not mean to go 8.44 with the wrong roll cage but it happened and I still got HP . The same rule should apply to everyone 1.20 under you get HP thats the only thing I commented on .

Buy a cobra jet and hit my combo dont bother me a bit everyone else does

Curious was it your car or a customers car that paid you to do the motor ? Surely you're not telling your customer to do his own stuff instead of having you mess it up are you

My engine builder also made a mistake at Indy in 08 and I got a year off for the mistake

B Parker 10-16-2012 08:14 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Bo So if I claim a 350 ci and during tear down they find that It's really a 400 ci the 350 should still get hp. Are you serious. You think that a roll bar is the same as something not right with a motor. Now I have run Brian's stuff for many years and have been threw many Indy tear downs. Nobody needs to defend him. He has always been first class and so has his work. As far as I'm concered there is no one any better doing stock and super stock engines. Barry Parker one very satisfied customer.

Alan Roehrich 10-16-2012 08:37 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 352262)
Tilburg , what I stated is that the rule say 1.20 automatic Hp . I have hit the trigger and got HP . The last time I got HP my roll cage was not legal but I still got HP . I did not mean to go 8.44 with the wrong roll cage but it happened and I still got HP . The same rule should apply to everyone 1.20 under you get HP thats the only thing I commented on .

Buy a cobra jet and hit my combo dont bother me a bit everyone else does

Curious was it your car or a customers car that paid you to do the motor ? Surely you're not telling your customer to do his own stuff instead of having you mess it up are you

My engine builder also made a mistake at Indy in 08 and I got a year off for the mistake

Bo, how much faster or slower did your roll cage make you? You were at legal weight, correct? And your engine was legal to the letter, right? And you had a legal transmission?

You're comparing apples and oranges.

An engine with the wrong size valves is illegal, as in it will not pass tech. Making any passes made with that engine invalid, for any purposes.

Oh, and for the record, if someone got your combination hit with a car that would not pass tech, I would be diametrically opposed to your combination getting HP, regardless of whether or not it deserves about 25, at least.

boster 10-16-2012 08:44 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
This is about a car going 1.20 under and on the qualifying sheet , then saying it had the wrong heads and no consequences for the party involved .

My buddy at the race went 1.201 under and got HP and was not torn down .He thinks the timing system could have been off by a thousands or two but he still got hp as did 3 other cars . The 402 should have got HP according to the rules .

I have no axe to grind or no intent to disrespect Brian Tilburg or the driver of the Nova my issiue is with the rule and how it was interpertid at the event .

So now for the record if you dont pass tech 1.20 runs dont count ? what happens if you dont get torn down they count ? so if you make a mistake and dont get caught then its ok ? and if you make a mistake and come clean at tear down you dont get punished for the mistake ?

Thats not how it work for me at the races

Alan Roehrich 10-16-2012 08:46 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 352275)
This is about a car going 1.20 under and on the qualifying sheet , then saying it had the wrong heads and no consequences for the party involved .

My buddy at the race went 1.201 under and got HP and was not torn down .He thinks the timing system could have been off by a thousands or two but he still got hp as did 3 other cars . The 402 should have got HP according to the rules .

I have no axe to grind or no intent to disrespect Brian Tilburg or the driver of the Nova my issiue is with the rule and how it was interpertid at the event .

So now for the record if you dont pass tech 1.20 runs dont count ? what happens if you dont get torn down they count ? so if you make a mistake and dont get caught then its ok ? and if you make a mistake and come clean at tear down you dont get punished for the mistake ?

Thats not how it work for me at the races

So a guy running a legal car should get HP because a guy running a car with the same combination that won't pass tech went fast? That's how it works for you at the races? :rolleyes:

boster 10-16-2012 08:50 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
No , thats how it works in your world . In my world I get a year off and HP . Wow you really could not bring yourself to say illegal car could you. LMAO

Alan Roehrich 10-16-2012 08:59 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 352277)
No , thats how it works in your world . In my world I get a year off and HP . Wow you really could not bring yourself to say illegal car could you. LMAO

Bo, it is you that claims the 402 Nova should get HP, despite the car not passing tech, it is not me.

boster 10-16-2012 09:12 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Alan , the only thing Im claiming is the rules should be the same for everyone and that's not what happened at the Dutch .

Instead of racer's complaining that the rules are not same for everyone we are bickering between our selves about who's right and who's wrong .

We should be talking about why the rules arent the same for everyone.

Simple example's

At the Dutch not every car that went 1.20 under was not torn down . Why were some and others not ?

Why does one driver with the wrong vales get supenden and other not ?

A few years ago a 428 cj went 1.20 under at a div1 race and got hp but was light at the scales still got the hp.

That's what concerns me, yes I think based on what I have seen and experinced the nova should get the HP

Alan Roehrich 10-16-2012 09:39 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 352280)
Alan , the only thing Im claiming is the rules should be the same for everyone and that's not what happened at the Dutch .

Instead of racer's complaining that the rules are not same for everyone we are bickering between our selves about who's right and who's wrong .

We should be talking about why the rules arent the same for everyone.

Simple example's

At the Dutch not every car that went 1.20 under was not torn down . Why were some and others not ?

Why does one driver with the wrong vales get supenden and other not ?

A few years ago a 428 cj went 1.20 under at a div1 race and got hp but was light at the scales still got the hp.

That's what concerns me, yes I think based on what I have seen and experinced the nova should get the HP


So, rather than make things right for everyone, they should make things wrong for everyone. Got it.

Oh, and by the way, there was a Ford that had the wrong valves who only got bounced at Indy a while back, too.

It's entirely possible the cars to be torn down were chosen before qualifying, that's fairly common. You don't have to be fadt to be torn down.

SS/GSI 10-16-2012 09:41 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
I don't know the racer in question, and I don't want to seem like I'm just picking on this one racer; however, everyone knows the rules when it comes to drawing attention to themselves when going fast and qualifying at the top of the sheet. You get torndown, you better be legal, for better or for worst. What I don't understand, and PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong, the racer in question goes 1.20 under + , and what doesn't think he's going to the barn at a race notorious for record runs and teardown? On top of that, we have a debatable performance gain or loss issue due to the exhaust valve situation, whatever. So what I want to know is why there was no year suspension for a clear violation of the engine specs. No HP, no repercussions, BO is right, why is it a case by case issue when the rules are black and white. I've seen and heard too many racers get more than this for less. My opinion to this racer, you wanna go fast you better make sure your engine "assembler" keeps you out of trouble or hope for the best. You got lucky.

novassdude 10-16-2012 09:43 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 352280)
Alan , the only thing Im claiming is the rules should be the same for everyone and that's not what happened at the Dutch .

Instead of racer's complaining that the rules are not same for everyone we are bickering between our selves about who's right and who's wrong .

We should be talking about why the rules arent the same for everyone.

Simple example's

At the Dutch not every car that went 1.20 under was not torn down . Why were some and others not ?

Why does one driver with the wrong vales get supenden and other not ?

A few years ago a 428 cj went 1.20 under at a div1 race and got hp but was light at the scales still got the hp.

That's what concerns me, yes I think based on what I have seen and experinced the nova should get the HP

I disagree that the nova should have got horsepower with the wrong heads. But the driver should have been parked for a year.

All 1.20 under runs should get checked before the automatic hp.

TILBURG 10-16-2012 10:04 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Lets not all get caught up in this 402 deal! Did you guys see that the 262 in a monza got 6hp. Guess we cant go there!lmfao

Crew Chief 10-16-2012 10:08 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by boster (Post 352280)
At the Dutch not every car that went 1.20 under was not torn down . Why were some and others not ?

Probably because it is not mandatory that those that go 1.20 under be torn down. Until it becomes mandatory by the sanctioning body, some will be torn down and some will not.

BLAZER 10-16-2012 10:42 PM

Re: HP adjustments after the Dutch - posted
 
This is the same old S--T,NHRA class racing will never be the same since nhra and manufactures wanted and allowed BOGUS H/P in--Cheating has been around since--day1--junior johnson built my 2 motor years ago--chevy orange when i brought them in--gray when i picked em up :D BTW fast in the day!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.