Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
NHRA finally put them up and Ken posted the link on the ClassRacer main screen...some of the changes could have been predicted while others (particularly some of the "no changes") amazed me but then I don't have access to all their data...read and weep ladies and gentlemen.
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Weep? I don't think so. I might open a bottle of bubbly?
I guess my trip to Reynolds paid off. That and a bunch of prayers. LOL Now it's on to the combo class. |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
The 5.7 DP got a 7 hp hit in SS. Ed Wright must be behind this, lol. Free HP for Christmas, tis the season!
Dennis Breeden |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Yeah, Dennis, I'm so stinking influential. LOL
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
I wonder who had the brass balls to get HP off a Cobra Jet, even if it is the puny one?
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
That would be me. Chad
Its not that good of a SS combo even at 229HP. Their is very little room for HP gains over the STK eliminator engine. A good SS 281 motor may make around 480-490 HP(which is only 50 or so more HP then a stocker one), maybe even 500 with the right cams. a good running 283 like Robbin browns makes well over 500 HP. Which is rated around 225 to 230 I think. |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Charley, thanks for the letter on the 305 too.
Norm Webber |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
283/220 is rated at 237(I run that same combo just nearly as fast as Robin!) |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
The 283s have been r&d for 50 years, just becuse you have a new car and want to go 1.20 under the first time out? Robin and Gene B have throw more camshafts away than you will ever try in the new cars. Hard work trial and error over the years got those cars where they are at. They where not fast when they started but got there over years of trying. The world has change and some are like little kids that want it now. Tom
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
A few of the "New" cars slid up a class in Stock:
427 COPO 428 CJ 2012 S/C CJ Charley probably slid down 2 or 3 :) See you at the races, Wayne Kerr |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
Dennis |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Tom when I try a new cam I haft to Buy two at a time. I have 3 sets on the bench that don't work @ around $1100-$1200 a set, plus the set in the car. Robin can try 6 to 7 different cams to my 3 sets. So don't tell me I don't spend the time and money on R&D. I can't tell you how many hours myself and others have spent at Holbrooks, Ronzello's & Big Stuffs trying tow find a little HP here and there.
Myself and others bulit my car from the ground up, so don't give me is BS about hard work and wanting everything right now. I work for everything I have. Just like most class racers. Ed the 283ci 220/224HP is now 220HP in a 64-66 Chevelle. Your welcome Norm, just think of it has a early X-mas gift. |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Not trying to argue Charlie, but how many YEARS of R&D do you have tied up there? How many sets of headers, etc?
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Ed years have nothing to with R&D. I could put 20plus years of R&D into a combo and it still may not run. Its what and how you do R&D that makes the difference.
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
I want to send out a big "thank you" to the LT1 Super Stock GT competitor(s) that got us 4 more horsepower! Great Job!!
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Don't go breaking your arm patting yourself on the back there David! Because the only thing I notice is stupidity when some no driving **** triggers a review just to thump his chest!
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Charlie Bob, there would be more room for improvement if it wasn't basically a super stock motor already. Couldn't resist.
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
Chevelle 283 cubic inches 9.25:1 compression Rochester 4GC Carburetor 1.72 1.50 valves Cobra Jet 281 cubic inches 11.0:1 compression 2x 62.5mm throttle body 2x 1.34 1x 1.50 valves Cubic inches are a wash, compression to the CJ, carb/throttle body to CJ, valve area to CJ (plus lighter intake valves). Take away the cam lift difference and intake difference because we're talking SS, add in the overhead cam and better heads to start with, and it's looking like that 281 of yours should be making quite a bit more power than that 283 Charley. I'm not going to say that you don't work hard on your car because you do, it's a lot more of a real stocker than many new cars out there, but I do not believe you have built a true SS motor with all of the tricks and good parts that is necessary for most combinations to run fast. |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Can anyone shed some light on why the exact same motor, 1966 275HP 327 Chevy, should be rated differently in the three body styles (Nova, Chevelle and Full-size) it was originally available in? I can understand that there might have been a difference from the factory, but are people building these motors differently depending on which vehicle they are putting them in?
Thanks! |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Maybe the 327's without 4GC's are the red headed step children . Once again the 68 327-250/265 GT combo gets no reduction. . Maybe the idea is to have older cars run SS and only slipery cars run GT.! However, the 68 327/275 stock version is now 265>
anyone got a 68 Chevelle? |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Rusty Super Stock guys are a lot smarter then Stockers who have the Lt1. If you run more than 1.00 under NHRA will beat you up with the ink pen. Thats why we are at 346 now. :):)
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
The advantage that we have for the LT1 in stock is that there are so many people that run it across many classes. Plus a lot of them go rounds in eliminations. This is huge because all those rounds are counted vs. just one for qualifying. You will see that the elimination rounds are most often the slower runs. It is all about the averages as long as it is kept slower than the 1.20 under. Keep the average for the class and engine family below the .85 threshold then it becomes no harm no foul for the 1.00 triggers. Sheer dumb luck and dilution is a wonderful thing. |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Thank you Rusty and Mr. Ratcliff. Ok Lt1 guys no HP in 2013. I'm at 3455lbs. now haha
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
For all you LS1 guys, according to my master computer revived from the Myan temple in Mexico, it will never get hp based on the average. Too many of yall. The 1.20 deal is something else however. I guess yall are the 'not so old' cars. Lots of them people mad at yall too. Them people.
|
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Maybe some of you long time class racers, or guys that understand the AHFS better can clarify something for me.
I went faster 1.00 under but slower than 1.20 under a total of 2 times last season, same event, different days. I guess my question is, why would my index be lowered .1 because of this? BTW, my average runs were way slower than 1.00 under. |
Re: Year End Horsepower Adjustments...
Quote:
. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.