396 super stock engine developtment
Hi again! We are in the planning phase of our new venture into the super stock ranks, this question is about how competitive the 375 hp 396 combo is, we have a good selection of castings for a motor like this, and were wondering about the pro's and cons (extra weight?) or higher class? with our car, the former Yves Perigny 69 camaro convertible.
Any insight would be welcomed, the choices are a bit overwhelming at the moment! Bill |
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
|
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Bill
I'm sure you will get lots of opinions but I will give you one more. Seeing as you are in Canada I'd be calling the Armstrong brothers. They have proven to be one of the best with the BBC and are right here in Canada. They are honest and fair. If you have any other questions feel free to reach out Mark |
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
|
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Run the 401 aluminum head, the cast iron heads are way more trouble.
My 396/375 runs around 0.9 under (9.45-9.50 in SS/EA) at over 142 MPH, with Kevin Cradduck driving. We have not had time to sort it out. The car had severe 4 link problems, it went that quick with a 1.34 60' time, and it should have a 60' time around 1.22-1.24. The 4 link has been repaired, and we've updated the engine. We go to the dyno again in about 3 weeks. My engine has Jimmy Bridges heads, intake, and Quick Fuel carburetor, on my shortblock. It is not a max effort engine. It's in an old school 69 Camaro that belongs to Scot LaMar. |
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
The 69 Convertible is a natural SS/G car....Many believe that you can run it is "E" but it doesn't fit. IMO, your car is not a good fit with the 375 HP engine....I would look into the 325.
|
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
|
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
I can show you where the money goes. You pay for a lot more than parts and labor, you pay for what people spent years learning. |
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Wow my first engine a 327/275 engine I paid 7500.00 for and went a best of -.78 under. Not lighting the world on fire but not bad for the money I spent.
|
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Looking at this from the point of:
You have a pretty good old stocker motor laying around. Put a roller and a good manifold on it. Engine should make enough power to create an entry level SS car. I'm talking about 2 to 3 tenths under, and there are not a whole bunch of cars in those classes, SS/EA, and SS/FA. |
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
|
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
|
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
I remember looking at Bo Laws spoiler (A lot of people did) back in the early 70's with the Speed costs money quote and truer words where never spoken................... Bob PS: Maybe it was the late 60's??????????? PSS: I also think that Alan knows a lot more than a lot of people........ |
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Wow 3815 lbs! The car with Yves in it was just less than 3400lbs in SS IA, I don't think you could find a place for an extra 400 lbs!
Bill |
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
PSS:
I also think that Alan knows a lot more than a lot of people........ __________________ Yep....Alan is not a stroke ! |
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
|
Re: 396 super stock engine developtment
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.