Weather station ET predictor suggestions
My system just died and I need some opinions on what everyone feels about the available systems.
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
I use a handheld Computech. Find it user friendly and accurate in the predictions.
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
I have a PerformAIRE Eclipse, which a lot of my fellow racers swear by but I swear at. I routinely run 0.2-0.3 under the devices prediction.
Here are the predictions and my ETs from last Sunday: 13.18/12.858 13.14/12.835 13.146/12.817 I burned hours trying to come up with a number to subtract from the machine for my dial, but If I had ignored it and paid more attention to the free time slip I would have just dialed 12.80. |
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Crew Chief Pro software in your laptop. Enter your weather data along with your runs, after three entered at a given track, it will predict dead nuts, if your car repeats well.
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Quote:
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Quote:
I don`t find my PerformAire to be much help predicting ET, either. Thought it was just me Guess I`m not alone. Thanks Mike A114 |
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Quote:
Ed's statement about 'three runs' is a little misleading. The software only predicts ET based on one single run that you choose as your base. Sometimes I'll flip it through a couple different 'base' runs to see if the predictions match. I've spent a lot of time analyzing runs and tweaking the formulas, but the stock ones are pretty darned good. Probably gotten myself lost more than I've helped. |
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Quote:
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Quote:
It does a better job that anything else I have used. It will predict from one base run. Predicts mine closer if I have a couple other runs. Thinking one run is all is needed is saying every car will pick up, or slow down, the same with the same weather change. They don't. |
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
I have the Perform Air computer based weather station. Race works software is easy to use and seems to be right on the money with my car. It takes a bit to get used to the program and how to get it set up. The price is good and they have good support. I would recommend this system. I don't have the paging option but you can add it on later. One thing about the prediction software is good info in and good info out. I had a hand held for years that was good and it died on me. The computer based is much better.
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Mike,
What do you use for the comparison base. DA, ALT A, Barometric pressure, ?? |
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
The system that I had asked for Pressure altitude dry bulb temp and wet bulb temp. It would put out a corrected altitude. Then you could ask it for a ET prediction based an a previous run and those three inputs. Was very close usually.
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Does anyone have a NOVA weather station for sale?
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
I use Computech RaceAir handheld. I have 11 No Box/PRO ET championships with it.
My pit partner also uses Computech but it interfaces to Crew Chief Pro. He also has a couple of Championships with it. I like the handheld, as it is mobile, and important if there are long delays while in staging. You choose the best, recent run as your baseline using Correction Factor or DA, and then the current factor to predict your next ET. If your combo is jetted correctly and the AFR is close to optimum (12.7-12.9 in my case), it will run within .005. Jay/Computech answers the phone on the weekends, also. I would also recommend DragStat ($ vs $$$) for your laptop. Created by a NHRA Super class racer (and D5 champ) out of Colorado. He also answers the phone for tech support. Clark Doukas |
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Quote:
|
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Quote:
We invented and have been manufacturing PerformAIRE weather stations for 25 years. I don't think we would have been doing it this long if our systems were not capable of working correctly. In order for any car to be predictable with any weather system the car must be repeatable and jetted correctly to respond to air change. If your car will NOT run the same 60' (+/0.002) and ET(+/-0.005) on back to back runs in the with the same DA (+/-100DA), it will never be more predictable then its best back to back run. Also very important is the Data you enter. Garbage in Garbage out. Per our instructions: You need to have at least 1000' change in DA across 5 to 6 runs in order to generally get a good prediction. Entering 2 or 3 runs with only a few hundred feet change in DA will generally NOT give a good prediction. We are always happy to take a look at your data and try to help you. You are free to email us directly with the run information you are trying to use, or if you like post it here and I will comment on it. |
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Sorry if this seems like a hijack, but one thing I see quite regularly, and it undoubtedly impacts ET consistency, is engine tuning with wide-band sensors in the header collector, and no turn-down elbows or extensions. More often than not the collector-mounted sensor gives a false reading that shows significantly leaner than the engine is actually running at. If you look at the attached picture, you can clearly see the collector sensor is reading much-much leaner than the sensors in each primary, mounted about 10" from the header flange. For EFI guys, the open collector & free-flowing back pulses are causing the control sensor (in the collector) to chase all over the place while trying to hold the A/F to target. There is absolutely nothing wrong with the EFI system, it is doing what it was commanded to do. In this case the exhaust & sensor locations are the problem, so much so that the EFI AFR Target had to be set to 13.9:1 in order to achieve an actual 12.25:1 ratio. Again, sorry if this seems like a hijack, but I had to chime in because running pig-fat on fuel is likely to cause inconsistencies that a weather station & ET predictor cannot account for. |
Re: Weather station ET predictor suggestions
Quote:
DA in the Seattle area can vary from 1963 to 3496 in the same weekend. Happened at the LOD race at Pacific Raceway.. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.