Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
Am I reading correctly that the Headrick engine used THREE four-barrel Holley #4210 carburetors?
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
Quote:
Mike A114 |
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
I saw under the hood of the pocket rocket at the 1976 race at Miami Hollywood Speedway Park.
There was three two barrels, possibly three webbers or three Holleys cut in half. |
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
I don't know what they were but there were 3 four barrel carburetors at one time.
Pete |
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
Quote:
https://www.12bolt.com/cotton-perry.html |
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
I saw it once with what appeared to be three Weber 55 WDCOE carburetors, and once with what appeared to be three 500 cfm Holley two barrel carburetors. I never saw it with Holley 4 barrel carburetors, but that does not mean they did not try it.
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
Quote:
And they were constantly trying new stuff, so there were probably countless variations of those three cars. http://www.drwebman.com/perry_headrick/ |
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
Near as I can tell, the #4210 was a 585cfm 4150 originally used as the OEM carbs on the cross-ram intake for the Chevrolet 302 V8.
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
Quote:
They had the same issue with intake manifolds, and if memory serves, they used to run completely hand-fabricated custom intake manifolds, with Edelbrock logos attached to them, in order to get paid. |
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
I worked tech in Div. ll 1970-75 and don't remember 3x4 carbs on the car or any MP car. Rules were 2x4 or 3x2 in modified. Did notice something I didn't remember in the 1976 rulebook. It stated that on 1/1/77 modified production classes will be consolidated with the gas classes but In don't think that ever happened.
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
Quote:
or were they in Comp... CRS..lol Mike A114 |
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
Modified Production, Gas, Street Roadster, Modified Compact, Super Modified were the classes in Modified Eliminator.
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
1 Attachment(s)
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
The Vette on the magazine cover was likely a gasser. No front bumper and bumpers were required in modified. Also there was no carb limit on a gasser.
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
The Corvette does have the factory bumpers for a 1956-57.
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
You are correct. I didn't even see them at first. Still think the car was in gas and not MP though.
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
My brother ran H/MP and he was running three weber side drafts on his 292 in a chevy ll body. We took it to Indy one year but couldn't get by Cotton. I don't remember what year it was but there must have been 12 or 14 H cars there.
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
The Vette was a L/Gas car, I was showing the 3-4barrels on it..
Timetraveler Did your brothers car have a name on it?. |
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
I have always had love and interest in inline drag engines. Most were before my time, but I did see Ann Peto make many passes and win the IHRA Modified championship with a 300 ford in a roadster,, meanwhile back to the post. I read anything I could find on Cotton's 292c.i. Chevy deuce, he had tried 2bbls., webbers, and 4bbls. I can't remember 3x4bbls. I'm not a induction expert but I don't think a sub 300 inch engine could even use 3 390cfm Nascar 4bbls. and I don't think they were available back then. Don Jackson
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
2 Attachment(s)
Here's Cotton engine 3-2barrel
|
Re: Cotton Perry's H/MP #2352 Chevy II(s)
1 Attachment(s)
Bench Racer,
John /Ann Peto |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.