NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Has anyone else read about this yet ? A local track posted this
After years of urging by many small race tracks including ours, NHRA will change some major safety rules to keep in stride with todays modern day muscle car. The current rule calls for a roll bar in any car going 13.99 or quicker, as of next year that will be changed and changed in a big way. "Recognizing the safety-inspired design and construction of today’s late model vehicles, the NHRA has actually rescinded its previous guidelines for street vehicles running 9.99 to 11.49 that required the use of a roll cage or roll bar, now permitting unaltered, 2008 and later model hard top vehicles to compete as they come from the factory without the addition of said roll bar/cage. The amendment, as its phrased in the NHRA’s 2012 to 2013 amendment document". These racers who previously had to slow their vehicles down or not show up at a track at all are now able to compete without the modifying their expensive factory cars, and regardless of who this new rule applies to and who it doesn’t, it certainly opens some racers up to visit a race track again. This does not apply to convertibles and cars that are older than 2008, please keep that in mind, but does affect many of the street cars that compete |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
So someone can show up with any 2008 and up Mustang/Challenger/ Camaro and go 9.99 with no bar ?
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
It used to be 2008 and newer (unaltrered) vehicles did not need a roll bar if running 10.00-11.49 at a "Street Legal" NHRA event. It appears that that new amendment applies to any NHRA track bracket race or TnT program. The new amendment just deleted the word "unaltered" from the 2008 and newer vehicle line. Note the line about tires...must be DOT labeled tires https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net...a6&oe=5C61DBCE |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Another enhancement by the NPTTOEAMHRA (National Pandering To The Original Equipment Automobile Manufacturers Hot Rod Association).
Coming soon for any 2008 and newer car: 1) Competing with the wheel covers on (because wheel covers stay on much better than they used to); 2) Competing with the windows down (because new cars never roll over; if they did, they'd need a roll bar); 3) Competing with your wife and kids in the car (because new cars are completely safe and the wife wants to see what the big deal is); 3) Letting your dog drive (because animals deserve a shot at the American Dream); 4) Burnouts across the starting line (because it's elitist and non-inclusive to only let the big shots do it); 5) Crew members holding the car during the burnout (because everyone should have a chance to be involved and get a participation trophy); 6) Nitrous Oxide bottles, secured with zip ties (because the only way to stop cheating is to sanction it, AND, zip ties so the bottle can be removed, at the end of the race; 7) Delay boxes (because it will make for "a better racing experience"; 8) Engine displacement whatever the owner/driver claims (because Tech is a hassle). |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
been like that here in Australia for the last 3-4 years . No safety clothing required either , no sfi jacket / pants etc .
A number now racing , as fast as 140MPH+ with power adders . Most run our Super Street , 10.00 - 12.99 . Stupid thing is parachute @ 140 With pre 2008 at least with ANDRA under 11.00 requires at least a rollbar and tech + sfi clothing . Under IHRA no bar till 10.49 safety clothing ? Tex |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
NHRA "Dedicated to $afety."
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
This rule has been in place for some time...
At our track if you so much as have drag radials or even a cold air intake you then "modified" and need a rollbar. There are very, very few cars that can go under 11.49 "BONE STOCK". |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Is that why Hagan & Pritchard ran no time in their Dodges at the last race? NHRA bending the rules!
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Meanwhile, 12.85 Stockers need a 6 pt bar, approved jacket and pants.
Thanks a lot ,NHRA |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
Quote:
^^ yes on both |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
The two year belt deal is another NHRA absurdity. |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
The quickest ET I personally witnessed out of each car was 11.14 and 10.80, respectively. |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
What makes a 2008 and newer car so much safer than a 2007 and earlier car? Fast cars from the factory are something NHRA didn't foresee.
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
What makes an 11.50 bracket car safer than a 12.85 Stock Eliminator car? |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
I'm sure the bottom line is a matter of following the money trail. My 87 Mustang street car needs a roll bar if the air is good. (11.40's) I don't want the seat belt hassle, so no roll bar, and I only go when the air is bad. I have no problem with a roll bar and race belts, but just let me use them (race belts) for more than 2 years! I hardly ever run it. But, I digress. I can't help myself when I see these roll bar threads. |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
NHRA: "We REALLY don't mind if you get injured." ...............or worse.
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
I have a few more things I'd like to do to the car. It's a toy, and I like getting what I can out of it. It'll probably go low 11's with what I want to do. I've always understood that there has to be a line (et) somewhere where a roll bar is required, and I'll eventually do the roll bar. But now, because a car is quick from the factory, it's safer than mine? |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Drive a U/sa and all you need is a helmet.
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
When I ran 11.80's in N/SA 4 years ago a helmet was all that I needed and my 28 year old seat belts |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
A roll "bar" is nothing more than a suppliant to the car, whitch the car is considered a cage of sorts. If being highly safe, a funny car roll cage is your only option, the rest is a money grab, pure and simple.
Fighter jets go longer than two years on belts, mostly after 6-10 gs I think. The dumbest, blow shield re-inspection, 1/4 inch steel goes bad I guess. |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
In the lower class Stockers you can run a 50 year old set of seat belts, but you can not run a set of aftermarket seat belts that are outdated by one day.Go figure.
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
Jim Caughlin SS 6019 |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
I'm sure nobody here is going to agree with me but, a car with anti-lock brakes, 12" wide tires, massive sway bars and 10 air bags is actually safer than a 1960's muscle car. I'm sorry guys. There is a reason why I don't let my granddaughters drive old cars. |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtxd27jlZ_g |
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Quote:
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Google the recent Challenger wreck in Dade County Florida, then tell me how safe the new cars are. Up to say 50 mph, ok, but over that, no difference. Just depends on what you hit.
|
Re: NHRA amended rollbar / cage rule
Certainly 50 years of development has contributed to safer modern cars, but that crash test with the 59 Chevy was about as lopsided as it could possibly be, in favor of the newer car. The 58 thru 64 full sized Chevrolets used the "wasp waist" X frame design, which has no frame rails along the outer body, only sheet metal from the rocker panels inward, to the transmission tunnel. So virtually no structure from the firewall to the rear axle on the sides. Then add 50 years of service, possibly in salt belt regions, who is to say how solid that poor 59 Chevy under the paint.
By comparison, my 59 Ford 2 door sedan has a steel boxed frame that runs along both rocker panels from firewall to rear leaf spring mounts, with 5 crossmembers connecting the left and right sides together. I am pretty sure it would not have folded up nearly as badly as the Chevy did. Certainly the steel dashboard, 4 foot long steering shaft, lack of in door gaurd beams and many other things would make my 59 a less than pleasant place to be in a collision, than a modern car. Funny thing is, I coud sit on the fenders of my 59 without any body damage, yet my 2010 Ranger has dents in the hood from a few pine cones falling on it! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.