327 300 1965 stocker
Anyone want venture a guess on how much HP it will make. ?
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Needs 425 to 450 HP to be competitive.
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
I would guess around 440 STP, but how it carries HP past peak would be very important to me.
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Needs about 410 to run a second under in I/SA.
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Jim get a hold of Tony Hernandez tony 5022 . Tony raced his corvette @ 250, 300, 365 hp. Jim Lewis would know hp.
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
So we know a 294 CUIN 283 4 jet can make 373 STP HP. 1.27 HP per inch. Now looking at the 300 HP 327 combination @ 340 CUIN. Bigger bore, more compression, 1.940 intake valve, more cross section in the intake port. It makes sense to me this engine should be able to make 1.27 HP per inch if not more. 1.27 X 340 = 432 HP. NHRA 365 HP 327 makes 470 HP. |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
327 /365 has too much difference to base a comparison off of . http://www.classracerinfo.com/Engine...MAKE=Chevrolet I don't know how far under you want to go , Jim, but I'm standing by my observation, using my formula that has been pretty accurate over the years. |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Mark,
Please speak more about your formula. |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
Anyway , the AFB deal should fall between the 4 GC and the Q-jet. We know that much . Other than that, I'd have to look at one closely, with the newer rules, and I just haven't. As mentioned , Jim Lewis would know the deal on them. I don't bother people at work, that do this stuff for a living, though. I haven't seen the ol' boy at the races in a while. |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Jim, we know what good 327-275's make so what we're looking at is....
-the difference between a good AFB and a good QJet -what (if any) difference there is in the cam (.399/.399 on the 300 & .390/.410 on the 275) -what (if any) difference there is in a good AFB intake compared to a good Qjet intake The 327/300 @ 265 isn't horrible. But the 327/250 is the same engine (except for the 4G) and intake and it's @ 245. I don't see the AFB covering the 20 hp difference, even with the intake being a bit better on the AFB.....given the current state of Stocker intake technology. But .60-.70 under should be no problem for a decent 327/300, though. -Al |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
10 - 15 years ago = 1.5 x factored HP in Stock
AND.....................= 2.0 x factored HP in SS NOW DAYS: Better figure at least 10 or 15 % Higher. To be competitive is getting tougher AND more expensive every darn year! If all you want is 6 or 7 under in full race mode = 375 would probably do it with that combo If the two fast I/SA last week at Winters had meet in later rounds = It would have taken at the very least 1.15 to 1.20 to be even be competitive. (I know the cars and my boy owns one of them) |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Just curious...
How do Aluminum and Iron Headed Lt-1 Engines fare in Stock? What power levels are they getting out of them? D |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
She can drive and the car is fast but the LT-1’s have been hit many times with HP putting them at a disadvantage to some other traditional older cars and some new combos. The LT-1 benefitted from a low HP factor for years and could dominate classes. There not slow by any means but the HP factor today makes it tough. That’s for aluminum headed combos. I know nothing about the iron headed versions. I raced one for a couple seasons. |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Sure. I never deleted any pictures, but lets revisit the oil pan that isn't even used. But back to my comment: "You no nothing about dyno's" after you made negative comments about simple formulas that can supply useful information, I wonder how much of the information a dyno can spit out you actually understand? Maybe you do.....Maybe you don't. |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
About 3 years ago, I was racing in a Stock/Super Stock race in Hagerstown, MD. After I was done for the day (lost), I took off the 4GC on my 65 Malibu J/S 327/250 and put on the 3721 AFB. It sounded good and was real responsive. After the run I was disappointed
to see that it ran just about what the 4GC did. The 4GC was one that I did myself and the AFB was done by a known Stock racer. Since then I have not tried it again and built a 327/350 and am VERY satisfied with the way it has run. Jim Henderson E/S 1029 |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
Something like .499 lift in/ex. Remember it being a nice street cam. |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
327/350 hydraulic cam .447-.447 lift
A Very popular street performance cam. |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Cool to have Chuck's wagon set to run again! I have an attachment to it as Herman Korf and I built that car in my garage and his. It was built to match my SStock Chevelle wagon at the time, but Herman ran it as a Stocker. Herman than traded his wagon for Chuck's '65 Chevelle 4-dr sedan SStocker, but then ran the 4-dr as a Stocker. The trade must have taken place around 1980.
Does the car still have the silver/blue 40 year old paint job? Lotta wins in that car. Chuck was a (good a**hole - ask Don Prudomme) and a great driver. Jerry |
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
Re: 327 300 1965 stocker
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.