CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=86396)

Adub464Q 12-21-2023 05:29 PM

New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Does anyone know the reason behind NHRA adding classes to stock eliminator? Is there an insurance sponsor for these new classes, so that if you run these classes you get a discounted rate through AAA coverage?

From my understanding, the SRAC was asked about adding FS/AAA in a meeting and it was a unanimous "No" from the SRAC members. Then, less than a month later the new class is announced.

What is next after these classes for the evolution of "stock" eliminator?

Alan Roehrich 12-21-2023 09:20 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Well, AAA is the 7.0# class we were asking for 14 years ago when we got AA. The reason was that there are several engines rated at over 440HP, which even a 7.5 end up well above their curb weight.


No idea why NHRA chose to do it now.

Jared Jordan 12-22-2023 01:22 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
What combos can run AAA?

'65 Race Hemi
'64 T-Bolt
'69 ZL1
...and?

Wonder too if the guys already running in AA can even get 200+ lbs out.

Selfishly, I hope this is the time when NHRA will add the '68 Dart/Cuda to Stock @ the 450 hp rating the '64/'65's got!

RonB 12-22-2023 01:49 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Now I have a reason to put the aluminum nose on my '64 race hemi car.

Does any know the index for AAA/SA?

Tony Fagnilli 12-22-2023 01:59 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adub464Q (Post 690473)
Does anyone know the reason behind NHRA adding classes to stock eliminator? Is there an insurance sponsor for these new classes, so that if you run these classes you get a discounted rate through AAA coverage?

From my understanding, the SRAC was asked about adding FS/AAA in a meeting and it was a unanimous "No" from the SRAC members. Then, less than a month later the new class is announced.

What is next after these classes for the evolution of "stock" eliminator?




I can tell you why FS/AAA was added. The chassis cert is only good to 3600 pounds. This year, some jerkoff got the combination hit, again, and now the min weight in FS/AA is 3590. If one does the math, that only leaves a ten pound cushion. So another hit, and the car would not be legal for stock, anymore.

Bob Don 12-22-2023 09:16 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
How long before we have stockers in the 6s! Lol

Brett C 12-22-2023 09:38 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony Fagnilli (Post 690505)
I can tell you why FS/AAA was added. The chassis cert is only good to 3600 pounds. This year, some jerkoff got the combination hit, again, and now the min weight in FS/AA is 3590. If one does the math, that only leaves a ten pound cushion. So another hit, and the car would not be legal for stock, anymore.

Super Stock

Billy Nees 12-23-2023 08:39 AM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob Don (Post 690525)
How long before we have stockers in the 6s! Lol

How long before we have NHRA's insurance company saying "hmmmm, 160 MPH cars racing 75 MPH cars? What could happen?"
Although, this could be a good thing. It would be a good time for NHRA to bring back "Junior Stock".

GUMP 12-23-2023 12:35 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adub464Q (Post 690473)
Does anyone know the reason behind NHRA adding classes to stock eliminator?

Justin Lamb?

Dan Fahey 12-24-2023 09:59 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690529)
How long before we have NHRA's insurance company saying "hmmmm, 160 MPH cars racing 75 MPH cars? What could happen?"
Although, this could be a good thing. It would be a good time for NHRA to bring back "Junior Stock".

Like Pure Stock !!

Got it

Dan

Barry Polley 12-25-2023 10:53 AM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 690484)
Well, AAA is the 7.0# class we were asking for 14 years ago when we got AA. The reason was that there are several engines rated at over 440HP, which even a 7.5 end up well above their curb weight.


No idea why NHRA chose to do it now.

It didn’t matter when the conventional stock asked for it. Factory race cars have more pull I’m guessing?

Merry Christmas Folks.

Bill Grubbs 12-25-2023 01:48 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
The story is long…cars being classed out and moved to super stock…then Don Fezzell @ Virginia…the Alphabet classes… the ZL1 and last years aborted re-alignment…one hit from being classed out. Then a trial balloon about cages/chassises.

Bottom line Stock is in a good spot now…you can never go home…but we do have some say in the enhancements.

Mike Gray 12-25-2023 04:32 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Okay so now we have AAA, where do we go from here AAAA? There's not going to be enough room on the windows for all those letters. LOL
Why not have A at the top and move the rest down? (I don't think a few decals hurt the racing budget.)
I'm all for any car meeting the requirements of stock eliminator having a place to race. I'm sure most lower-class combo's get extra pleasure from defeating a faster car.

Bill Grubbs 12-25-2023 04:51 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Gray (Post 690630)
Okay so now we have AAA, where do we go from here AAAA? There's not going to be enough room on the windows for all those letters. LOL
Why not have A at the top and move the rest down? (I don't think a few decals hurt the racing budget.)
I'm all for any car meeting the requirements of stock eliminator having a place to race. I'm sure most lower-class combo's get extra pleasure from defeating a faster car.

Potatoe…Potato
Tomatoe…Tomato

Don Kennedy 12-26-2023 11:46 AM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry Polley (Post 690603)
It didn’t matter when the conventional stock asked for it. Factory race cars have more pull I’m guessing?

Merry Christmas Folks.

Does ayone know just how much pull the factory has as far as financial to anyone including NHRA I suspect the amount of money if in fact there is some money being exchanged is not even close to what the racers pay ,just aother thought to ponder during the off season lol

Billy Nees 12-26-2023 12:09 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
so when are the "Little Guys" going to get a FWD class or two?

Alan Roehrich 12-26-2023 01:06 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690653)
so when are the "Little Guys" going to get a FWD class or two?


Even better, when can they be properly moved to a regular class?

Billy Nees 12-26-2023 01:34 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 690657)
Even better, when can they be properly moved to a regular class?

I'd be OK with that. Can we combine the Sticks and Automatics at the same time?

Alan Roehrich 12-26-2023 01:39 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690663)
I'd be OK with that. Can we combine the Sticks and Automatics at the same time?




Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of one pound weight breaks.

Billy Nees 12-26-2023 01:49 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 690664)
Actually, I was thinking more along the lines of one pound weight breaks.

Is it one pound with Sticks and Autos combined? From I/S down there's the same or less participation than in the FWD classes.
Based on indexes, a FWD combo would need between a 3 and 4 pound weight break.

Alan Roehrich 12-26-2023 01:55 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690665)
Is it one pound with Sticks and Autos combined? From I/S down there's the same or less participation than in the FWD classes.
Based on indexes, a FWD combo would need between a 3 and 4 pound weight break.


Actually, I think one pound weight breaks with FWD rolled into appropriate classes is a big enough step to start with. That's a substantial reduction in the number of classes, and should result in plenty of heads up runs on its own.

Billy Nees 12-26-2023 02:13 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 690667)
Actually, I think one pound weight breaks with FWD rolled into appropriate classes is a big enough step to start with. That's a substantial reduction in the number of classes, and should result in plenty of heads up runs on its own.

I absolutely agree but at the same time it would be much less controversial to combine Sticks and Autos at one pound (different HP factors) than it would be to combine FWDs because the FWDs would need a serious HP/weight factor break. Although I wouldn't mind seeing it. It sure would "tighten" things up and stop a lot of the sandbagging.

Alan Roehrich 12-26-2023 04:28 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690669)
I absolutely agree but at the same time it would be much less controversial to combine Sticks and Autos at one pound (different HP factors) than it would be to combine FWDs because the FWDs would need a serious HP/weight factor break. Although I wouldn't mind seeing it. It sure would "tighten" things up and stop a lot of the sandbagging.




Adjusting the weight breaks to put FWD cars in regular classes, and putting all classes on a one pound weight break, will accomplish that, without adding the extra change. It also affects every combination in the class, without excluding some and including others. Everyone gets a weight break change. And new competitors. It also achieves at least as great a reduction in classes, and as great an increase in heads up races.

Billy Nees 12-26-2023 06:32 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 690686)
Adjusting the weight breaks to put FWD cars in regular classes, and putting all classes on a one pound weight break, will accomplish that, without adding the extra change. It also affects every combination in the class, without excluding some and including others. Everyone gets a weight break change. And new competitors. It also achieves at least as great a reduction in classes, and as great an increase in heads up races.

I'm not understanding why your reluctance to combine Sticks and Autos. I also personally think that the FS cars should be combined too.

Bobby Fazio 12-26-2023 07:06 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690689)
I'm not understanding why your reluctance to combine Sticks and Autos. I also personally think that the FS cars should be combined too.

Which index would you use? The stick or auto? As far as FS, sticks and autos are already combined, no?

Billy Nees 12-26-2023 07:12 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bobby Fazio (Post 690693)
Which index would you use? The stick or auto? As far as FS, sticks and autos are already combined, no?

So are FWDs.

Alan Roehrich 12-26-2023 07:17 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690689)
I'm not understanding why your reluctance to combine Sticks and Autos. I also personally think that the FS cars should be combined too.


I'm not understanding your obsession with it.


The one pound weight breaks and rolling the FWD cars into the appropriate classes creates the smaller number of classes, and the other desired results.



And, honestly, the pure factory race cars should be in their own completely separate classes.

Mark Yacavone 12-26-2023 10:27 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 690697)


The one pound weight breaks and rolling the FWD cars into the appropriate classes creates the smaller number of classes, and the other desired results.


.

Alan the facts are..there are no appropriate RWD classes for the bulk of of the current crop .Most are centered around DF/S and EF/S ,which are low 17's to low 16 second cars.
The bottom RWD class is W, which is a mid 16 index ,but most can run in the15's.
V/S(A) is for V6's or 4 cylinder combos. The good one run in the 14's
How would you equalize that situation? Lower the FWD hp's ? How would they get enough weight out to speed them up?
Raise the V and W indexes, where there are already second under cars?
All I see is a whole bunch of grief for guys that aren't bothering anyone, and trying to race on a limited budget. I say leave the FWD guys alone .They are the only entry level cars left in NHRA class racing.

Now ,.if you want to combine say, D and E, and F and G... go ahead ,but it will end up as a net loss for NHRA ,when the newer guys have a heads up run , every other round, and then stop going to Divisionals ;-)

Billy Nees 12-27-2023 08:38 AM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 690697)
I'm not understanding your obsession with it.

And, honestly, the pure factory race cars should be in their own completely separate classes.

I wouldn't say "obsessed" with it. There just aren't enough Stick cars running anymore and with the HP factors being done the way they are it just seems like common sense to me. More so than going to one pound weight breaks after thinking about Yac's post.

"Honestly" if you feel that the "pure factory race cars should be in their own completely separate classes" then IMHO they should be in SS where they belong along with all of the other "pure factory race cars". You know, like the Race Hemis, the Thunderbolts and the 427 Camaros. But I'm guessing that somebody will just come on here and tell me that , "we can't go back, mistakes were made, live with it".

Billy Nees 12-27-2023 09:05 AM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone (Post 690701)
I say leave the FWD guys alone .They are the only entry level cars left in NHRA class racing. ;-)

Like, like,like and the absolute truth!

rseibenick 12-27-2023 10:11 AM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
The FWD cars went from 8 diff weight breaks , stick and auto for 16 diff. classes in 2003 to 6 combined classes now in 2023. We have already helped to reduce the # of classes in stock. .

SDmopar 12-27-2023 10:24 AM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
They should just avg the stick and auto HP numbers and run them together.

Alan Roehrich 12-27-2023 11:51 AM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690705)
I wouldn't say "obsessed" with it. There just aren't enough Stick cars running anymore and with the HP factors being done the way they are it just seems like common sense to me. More so than going to one pound weight breaks after thinking about Yac's post.

"Honestly" if you feel that the "pure factory race cars should be in their own completely separate classes" then IMHO they should be in SS where they belong along with all of the other "pure factory race cars". You know, like the Race Hemis, the Thunderbolts and the 427 Camaros. But I'm guessing that somebody will just come on here and tell me that , "we can't go back, mistakes were made, live with it".


The Cuda's and Darts are in Super Stock.



The difference between some of the cars of old and the new factory race cars has been rehashed here a thousand times.Most of the older factory hot rods were not 4-5 times as expensive as the pedestrian street cars, even the ZL-1 was only about 3 times higher. A new factory race car is over $100,000. Most of the older cars came with full legal equipment, and a VIN. The new factory race cars come with none of that.


In all honesty, many of the factory race cars are truly "paper cars", some of the engines were never even built or available at all. Many of the ones that were, were never sold in sufficient quantity to meet the old rules. The old stuff is held to a higher standard. The best example is the 67 L-88. We know 36 were built, and sold by dealers, and we know a bunch went out the "back door" in the form of parts, etc. Some new Fords were never even built, not even one, and with Chevrolet selling 69 COPO cars a year, there weren't even 36 of many combinations built, there weren't even 50 built of some over 2-3 years. You can race all of them. But you can't race a 67 L-88 Corvette.

Billy Nees 12-27-2023 12:10 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Have you priced a new Camaro or Mustang (or Challenger) lately? More like half-again more expensive if that. Ya know the one thing that has always stuck in my mind about the original COPOs? They had window stickers on them but they were blank. At least the two that went through my local Chevy Dealer were.

As far as VINs go, there's an awful lot of Pontiacs and Oldsmobiles running around without them. I would have to say that the precedence for allowing the new stuff in was probably set when NHRA started allowing the older SS only stuff into Stock. And yes, I've been around long enough to remember when they were built and sold as SS only.

Billy Nees 12-27-2023 12:13 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich (Post 690716)
The Cuda's and Darts are in Super Stock.

Not anymore! The way I'm seeing it, the '68 Darts and Cudas can fit AAA.

Carguy49 12-27-2023 12:16 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Since the discussion is on some of the older cars, I have a question. When did the 64 Ford Thunderbolt combination become legal for stock?? They were built as S/S only back in the day. It is what it is, but just curious.

Billy Nees 12-27-2023 12:51 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carguy49 (Post 690719)
Since the discussion is on some of the older cars, I have a question. When did the 64 Ford Thunderbolt combination become legal for stock?? They were built as S/S only back in the day. It is what it is, but just curious.

When a Racer with NHRA's ear wanted it!

Alan Roehrich 12-27-2023 01:04 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Yacavone (Post 690701)
Alan the facts are..there are no appropriate RWD classes for the bulk of of the current crop .Most are centered around DF/S and EF/S ,which are low 17's to low 16 second cars.
The bottom RWD class is W, which is a mid 16 index ,but most can run in the15's.
V/S(A) is for V6's or 4 cylinder combos. The good one run in the 14's
How would you equalize that situation? Lower the FWD hp's ? How would they get enough weight out to speed them up?
Raise the V and W indexes, where there are already second under cars?
All I see is a whole bunch of grief for guys that aren't bothering anyone, and trying to race on a limited budget. I say leave the FWD guys alone .They are the only entry level cars left in NHRA class racing.

Now ,.if you want to combine say, D and E, and F and G... go ahead ,but it will end up as a net loss for NHRA ,when the newer guys have a heads up run , every other round, and then stop going to Divisionals ;-)




Are they truly "entry level"? Ie., are they a gateway for people looking to get into class racing, learn, and move up? Or are they a protected special class, for people to play in the deep end of the pool, with water wings, instead of learning to swim?




Look, I don't mind FWD, it's not my cup of tea, but variety is the spice of life.


The true concept of a dime rocket is really cool. The idea of an underfactored combination, where you can buy the car for a low price, you go buy used wheels and tires, cheap headers, freshen the engine, build a nice budget transmission with a cheap converter, throw in a gear on a spool, and go run 0.80+ under, that's frikkin awesome. If you're not hiding from heads up runs, even better.



But when I read these posts you guys make, the FWD guys don't want heads up races (but Billy wants to make the RWD stick guys race the RWD automatic guys heads up), they want to deep stage, and they want the "first or worst" rule rescinded. They want to buy their car for under $1250 on marketplace. They don't want to buy high end pistons, rings, camshafts, clutches, converters, etc. But they want a "level playing field" that suits them, to race guys who make the investment.




Are we talking about NHRA Stock Eliminator here?


Or are we talking about NHRA Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Eliminator?


As usual, the conversation is not a conversation, or a discussion. It's a dead end.

Jared Jordan 12-27-2023 01:20 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Billy Nees (Post 690718)
Not anymore! The way I'm seeing it, the '68 Darts and Cudas can fit AAA.

Not yet. Still in the guide as SS only and without an HP reduction, they won't fit AAA. 5.98 lbs/hp when rated @ 505 hp, the current SS factor.

But here's hoping. *fingers crossed*

Bobby Fazio 12-27-2023 01:29 PM

Re: New Classes in Stock AAA/SA, AAA/S and FS/AAA
 
Weren't these Super Stock Only combos when they came out?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jared Jordan (Post 690503)
What combos can run AAA?

'65 Race Hemi
'64 T-Bolt
'69 ZL1
...and?

Wonder too if the guys already running in AA can even get 200+ lbs out.

Selfishly, I hope this is the time when NHRA will add the '68 Dart/Cuda to Stock @ the 450 hp rating the '64/'65's got!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.