CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   No Mine Shaft for 2025! (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=89091)

Herbie Null 02-17-2025 07:08 PM

No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
The SRAC tried to bring back mine shaft rule this year, NHRA rules committee denied the request!! So let me understand this, no mineshaft rule at 100ft and all runs count, but at +4200ft at Indy the runs do not count towards the AHFS? �������� unbelievable! Can anyone explain the logic here?

Bob Gullett 02-17-2025 07:26 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
There was a rumor that the AHFS would be not be used for all class eliminations but I'm guessing not.

Larry Hill 02-17-2025 08:15 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
So Indy is the only place us southern boys can say “Hay y’all watch this!”

Sgrossi7158 02-17-2025 08:57 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
I hate the AHFS. I personally think that Stk/SS is a performance class and should be treated as such. ie; qualified field, lane choice to the lower qualifier, routine tear downs, etc. However, I realize NHRA has chosen not to go in that direction. NHRA has chosen the AHFS as a means to police the class. With that being the case, I don’t see the logic in waiving the AHFS at certain events. The system simply will not work as designed under these circumstances.

GTX JOHN 02-17-2025 11:25 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
I did not see the No Mineshaft on the NHRA website.

Did I miss it somewhere?.

GUMP 02-18-2025 08:54 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
The mineshaft rule actually works against you if you make a fast run. It takes away all of the runs for the weekend that could be used to lower the average. Not just the fast run.

countrypuppy4865 02-18-2025 09:27 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GUMP (Post 709609)
The mineshaft rule actually works against you if you make a fast run. It takes away all of the runs for the weekend that could be used to lower the average. Not just the fast run.



This is especially bad at the end of the year.

Lyn Smith 02-18-2025 09:51 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
I think every new rule idea submitted was shot down by the rules committee. Some that I heard that got submitted for Stock were allowing addition valve reliefs to solve the piston ding problem, and allowing pistons to be made with the smaller size ring lands so racers would not have to use spacers. Both got shot down. I'm sure there were more. The poll that was taken to see if racers wanted the indexes lowered had a very low percentage of eligible racers voting, and it was shot down.

Rick J 02-18-2025 10:07 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lyn Smith (Post 709611)
I think every new rule idea submitted was shot down by the rules committee. Some that I heard that got submitted for Stock were allowing addition valve reliefs to solve the piston ding problem, and allowing pistons to be made with the smaller size ring lands so racers would not have to use spacers. Both got shot down. I'm sure there were more. The poll that was taken to see if racers wanted the indexes lowered had a very low percentage of eligible racers voting, and it was shot down.

What's the piston ding problem?

JP1738 02-18-2025 10:39 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
wtf is the point of AHFS if it isn't employed at races where guys actually have to run their ***** wide open?

JP1738 02-18-2025 10:41 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
.........................

James Perrone 02-18-2025 12:28 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JP1738 (Post 709614)
wtf is the point of AHFS if it isn't employed at races where guys actually have to run their ***** wide open?

The idea of mineshaft is that the weather is stupid fast for everybody
Including you slow poke
When you have more than 50% of the field going 85 under that means it?s freaking fast out there

Mineshaft is more helpful than harmful

JP1738 02-18-2025 01:55 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by James Perrone (Post 709621)
The idea of mineshaft is that the weather is stupid fast for everybody
Including you slow poke
When you have more than 50% of the field going 85 under that means it's freaking fast out there

Mineshaft is more helpful than harmful

hey hey hey, no name calling lol

Anyway, fair. I can see the importance and necessity of a mineshaft rule. Maybe more generally, when the mineshaft rule isn't/wouldn't be in play, why do we not have AHFS at all of those races too? Like Indy, National opens, etc? Also, what defines mineshaft air and who makes the decision on when the air is too good?

Pistol Pete 02-18-2025 03:36 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JP1738 (Post 709634)
hey hey hey, no name calling lol

Anyway, fair. I can see the importance and necessity of a mineshaft rule. Maybe more generally, when the mineshaft rule isn't/wouldn't be in play, why do we not have AHFS at all of those races too? Like Indy, National opens, etc? Also, what defines mineshaft air and who makes the decision on when the air is too good?

Read post 12.
When more than 50% of the field goes more than 85 under.
It used to go to the mineshaft rule.

JGrossijr 02-18-2025 03:52 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by James Perrone (Post 709621)
...When you have more than 50% of the field going 85 under that means it?s freaking fast out there.

By that definition Indy 2024 was a mineshaft. More than half the Stock field was over a second under.
The relationship between AHFS and indexes is out of whack

jmantle 02-18-2025 07:34 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rick J (Post 709612)
What's the piston ding problem?

As you are not allowed to notch pistons for valve clearance, NHRA saw fit to make it illegal to allow your valves to do the job.

JP1738 02-20-2025 10:30 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JGrossijr (Post 709642)
By that definition Indy 2024 was a mineshaft. More than half the Stock field was over a second under.
The relationship between AHFS and indexes is out of whack

Exactly, which is why I asked the clarifying question. If there are that many people with the ability to go 1.0+ under in terrible air, maybe we don't have a mineshaft rule until AHFS has a chance to catch up and get some combos in line.

GUMP 02-20-2025 10:37 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JP1738 (Post 709697)
Exactly, which is why I asked the clarifying question. If there are that many people with the ability to go 1.0+ under in terrible air, maybe we don't have a mineshaft rule until AHFS has a chance to catch up and get some combos in line.

Sounds good. But, in reality, having the mineshaft rule in place allows less runs to fix your average. Without the mineshaft rule you can fix that 1.00 run on a good weekend. Ask me how I know....

Bryan Worner 02-21-2025 02:02 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GUMP (Post 709698)
Sounds good. But, in reality, having the mineshaft rule in place allows less runs to fix your average. Without the mineshaft rule you can fix that 1.00 run on a good weekend. Ask me how I know....

So slow your average at ?slow? races! Mineshaft rules are for extremely fast weather conditions that don?t occur often.

GUMP 02-21-2025 02:07 PM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner (Post 709749)
So slow your average at ?slow? races! Mineshaft rules are for extremely fast weather conditions that don?t occur often.

Like Indy?

Bryan Worner 02-22-2025 12:09 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GUMP (Post 709751)
Like Indy?

Indy just shows you how much everyone holds their stuff back all year long. The US Nationals does not have mineshaft conditions but everyone runs all out to win class.

JGrossijr 02-22-2025 09:36 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner (Post 709780)
Indy just shows you how much everyone holds their stuff back all year long. The US Nationals does not have mineshaft conditions but everyone runs all out to win class.

Some would argue that indicates everyone above the line needs an AHFS horsepower hit.
Others would argue this indicates indexes haven't kept pace with performance improvements since the last adjustment (2009?).
My guess is most would agree it indicates one of holes in the AHFS system, which is that it is easily manipulated and not likely to be effective or equitable for that reason alone.

GUMP 02-22-2025 09:42 AM

Re: No Mine Shaft for 2025!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan Worner (Post 709780)
Indy just shows you how much everyone holds their stuff back all year long. The US Nationals does not have mineshaft conditions but everyone runs all out to win class.

It's a tough situation. I honestly don't know what the fair answer is.

We work hard to protect our combinations. The 376 has already triggered one qualifying session in. Now Bragg has a heads-up first round. Foley went faster than we guessed he would too. So, now we have to work on our average or get HP.

Until last year, I had no clue that the low HP 396's could go so fast. How about that 350/255!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.