CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock Tech (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   rod bearings recommendation (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=47885)

Ed McLawhorn Jr. 06-16-2013 08:38 PM

rod bearings recommendation
 
Working on our old 283 for local combo races. Currently checking clearances and need some recommendations/help on rod bearings. Standard rod journal size.

Also need some help on bearing identification on old bearings. Only marking I can see is the number "2993" and a stamp of some type. Not able to recognize stamp. They are at least 25 yrs old.

thanks

Ed

Lew Silverman 06-16-2013 10:30 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
I've been using the Clevite H-Series Tri-Armor coated bearing for my small-journal 327. Competition Products had a number of different sizes available. I know that King also has the small-journal bearings in their most recent catalog, and they make a quality product.

No guess on the old shells, I'm afraid. A lot of companies made engine bearings back when that motor was new, but it would make an interesting search! Could you take a picture of the number/stamp?

Good luck with your 283 project! What's in going in?:)

Lew

Ed McLawhorn Jr. 06-16-2013 11:14 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
Lew,
thanks... Will look into the "H" series. Any performance over the "P" series?

Yes, I can get a pic and attempt to post. May need help from some of the pros to post.

It's going back into a 66 chevy2 wagon. Hoping to get things together later this year and have some fun again.

Ed

Ed McLawhorn Jr. 06-17-2013 06:48 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
1 Attachment(s)
As a follow-up to the 283 build, does anyone recognize the stamp and number for this rod bearing? Again, it's at least 25yrs old. Disregard the background...I just propped the bearing up against a box to take pic. thanks for any input.

Ed

Rich Biebel 06-18-2013 07:02 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
Looks like a VanderVel logo....and that is my guess....

They were around 25 years ago and I used them on some engines

Clevitte did not make H bearings yet...and the VanderVels were good...

They usually had a little more clearance than a Clevitte....

VanderVel is part of Mahle now and so is Clevitte I believe...

We used Clevittes in almost every engine as well as some C&A's and VanderVels occasionally.....

Ed McLawhorn Jr. 06-18-2013 07:17 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
Rich,
thanks for the info. I went to dad's this afternoon and found some 350 bearings with the same stamp. The good news is they were still in the box and it was a VanderVels box. They were also old as well. Dad hardly ever throws things away...it just takes time to find stuff.

Ed

danny waters sr 06-18-2013 07:35 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
Glad you all are coming back......have fun

Ed McLawhorn Jr. 06-18-2013 07:49 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
Danny,
It has been a long time since it was run. It will also be a slow process coming back. Not sure when will complete, but you got to start somewhere.

And you are correct, the main goal is to have some fun!

Ed

Lew Silverman 06-18-2013 09:24 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
And it appears that the number "2993" is the rod journal diameter (2.2993), Vandervell Set VP768.

Adger Smith 06-18-2013 10:30 PM

Re: rod bearings recommendation
 
Clevite gobbled up Vandy bearing Co. In the past you could get the same Vandy material you just add V to the Clevite bearing part number and dropping the 'H" or "P".. For instance CB 745H becomes CB745V. BTW: CB745 is the SJ Chevy number. The "V" material formula is a little softer and more forgiving than the harder "H". It works well in applications that the crank flexes a lot and the oil film gets so thin the bearing bumps the crank. IE: 282-327 SJ Engines.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.