CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock Tech (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Valve overlap (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=65040)

west coast 01-24-2017 12:02 PM

Valve overlap
 
OK going to try and make this simple. I have measured my cam on lift and degrees so i know what the lift is at during every degree of engine rotation. My question is at what lift point do you calculate valve overlap and if it is measured at the lifter lift or multiplied by the rocker ratio for valve lift.So at .050 or something else. i also used Wallace racing calculator but not sure where they measure theirs at and not sure if their calculator is a standard pattern or a roller pattern for the ramps. Not getting into what it should be yet just need to know first then talk about affects and what it should be.

John Dinkel 01-24-2017 05:05 PM

Re: Valve overlap
 
I found this on the internet.

Here's an example:
Comp Cams XE294H
Adv Dur: int 294º, exh 306º
110 LSA, 106 ILC (4º advance)
Valve timing @ .006"
Int opens @ 41º BTDC
Int closes @ 73º ABDC
Exh opens @ 87º BBDC
Exh closes @ 39º ATDC

Adding the int open and exh close times (41+39) the overlap is 80º

Using the formula above:
294+306=600
600/4=150
150-110=40
40*2=80
The overlap is 80º

Larry Hill 01-24-2017 05:13 PM

Re: Valve overlap
 
On one of my cams the ex. closes 15* atdc and intake opens 15* btdc for a total 30* of both valves being open at the same time based on .006 tappet lift. This my not be the answer to your question but this is how I understand it in my backyard. It's a good possibility that I am incorrect.

FireSale 01-25-2017 02:47 AM

Re: Valve overlap
 
There's a difference between engine math (which I understand) and it's effect on performance (which I don't always) and I think the performance part is what you are after. Lunati has a nice explanation of what it means in terms of performance on their tech site. Link below.

http://www.lunatipower.com/Tech/Cams/CamSpecTerms.aspx

BTW: Those block photos you sent Brian were helpful. Now I understand why I cant easily run stocker heads on my M6010 block.

west coast 01-25-2017 11:59 AM

Re: Valve overlap
 
So it looks like there is no real standard of what lift you should measure valve overlap. Since i have a comp cam i will kind of fallow them. It sounds like you should use the numbers for tappet lift done during advertised duration which is .006. i found the web page that had the formula's that John Dinkel posted on here which work if your cam card reads valve timing at advertised duration which mine doesn't it is at .050. So now on to understanding all the theory's behind all of this.

Dale hope my costly mistake will save you money. Its hard to explain the problem but a picture is worth a thousand words that will leave you speechless sometimes.

FireSale 01-25-2017 01:02 PM

Re: Valve overlap
 
Read the Duration section of this link. It explains a bit more about the effects of duration and why cam grinders use 0.050 lift. It's a bit too long to post.

http://www.austincc.edu/wkibbe/camtheory.htm

Also this from the HotRod network:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ccrp-...amshaft-power/

Also: I'm going to just keep my AFR 1399 heads with the 1.9/1.6 valves that they come with. No fit issues with the BOSS302 block. If I declare the car for SS/CS I can run the Combo legally. Aluminum heads any valve size 10.5 lbs/cid. The index sucks O2 (10.30) but I have thrown t he book at my car over the Winter.

SSDiv6 01-25-2017 03:09 PM

Re: Valve overlap
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FireSale (Post 525042)
Read the Duration section of this link. It explains a bit more about the effects of duration and why cam grinders use 0.050 lift. It's a bit too long to post.

http://www.austincc.edu/wkibbe/camtheory.htm

Also this from the HotRod network:
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ccrp-...amshaft-power/

Also: I'm going to just keep my AFR 1399 heads with the 1.9/1.6 valves that they come with. No fit issues with the BOSS302 block. If I declare the car for SS/CS I can run the Combo legally. Aluminum heads any valve size 10.5 lbs/cid. The index sucks O2 (10.30) but I have thrown t he book at my car over the Winter.

Sorry Dale, you cannot run aluminum cylinder heads in SS/CS class, only cast iron, inline/wedge heads only.

FireSale 01-25-2017 04:12 PM

Re: Valve overlap
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SSDiv6 (Post 525056)
Sorry Dale, you cannot run aluminum cylinder heads in SS/CS class, only cast iron, inline/wedge heads only.

OK. I read this revision as "Aluminum heads OK. No billet in modified classes except CS"

2017 revision:
Aftermarket aluminum cylinder heads permitted (no billet) except in CS.

I'll take the car to ETI in March and see. I'm beginning to not care any more.

Back to camshafts.

SSDiv6 01-25-2017 05:04 PM

Re: Valve overlap
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by FireSale (Post 525062)
OK. I read this revision as "Aluminum heads OK. No billet in modified classes except CS"

2017 revision:
Aftermarket aluminum cylinder heads permitted (no billet) except in CS.

I'll take the car to ETI in March and see. I'm beginning to not care any more.

Back to camshafts.

Dale,
The rule can be confusing.
What the rule change should say is that any aftermarket aluminum head, except billet heads are allowed.
Still, SS/CS class is NHRA approved cast iron cylinder heads only.

Prior to the current rule, it was required to run approved cylinder heads that had an OEM part number.

As applicable to your Mustang, would be the Ford N351 cast iron cylinder head casting.The N351 head, as cast, just with port matching, will outflow the AFR 165 heads by a mile.

Adger Smith 01-26-2017 01:59 AM

Re: Valve overlap
 
Comp Cams Chart
http://www.compcams.com/Pages/413/ca...ion-angle.aspx
Might give you some added info


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.