CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   HP rating for this combo? (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=68092)

fredjohnston 11-01-2017 10:33 AM

HP rating for this combo?
 
Just curious if the HP rating for this combo has changed because of the performance at Vegas. And, if not why hasn't it?

1 757 GT/IA Larry Zavala, Montebello CA, '86 Camaro 9.616 10.83 -1.214

John Stock 11-01-2017 11:29 AM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
No. I don't believe it has, or will.

The ET was 9.616 which corrects to a sea level run of 9.453. the sea level GT/IA index is 10.65 which makes the run corrected to sea level -1.197. Close but no exploding cigar for Larry.

I will say the reported adjusted altitude was 4100 for that round which makes that one bad hot rod.

fredjohnston 11-01-2017 11:33 AM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
Runs of 1.200 or more under the index will be reviewed and adjusted Tuesday following the event. Runs at all NHRA National, Sports National, and LODRS events, including those at altitude factored race tracks, are included in the 1.200-second-or-more-under analysis

Herbie Null 11-01-2017 12:24 PM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
It was changed 10/31/17 now at 279 in GT

fredjohnston 11-01-2017 08:53 PM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Herbie Null (Post 548883)
It was changed 10/31/17 now at 279 in GT

He ran or claimed the 88/89 combo in Vegas?

Ed Wright 11-02-2017 10:24 AM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by fredjohnston (Post 548922)
He ran or claimed the 88/89 combo in Vegas?

'86 thru '92 F body, and '85 thru '91 Corvette is all the same L98 engine. Why would year model matter. Factory hp rating is different? Some had different camshafts, which are not used in SS or SS/GT. Should be automatic hp the following Monday, right?

Dwight Southerland 11-02-2017 10:48 AM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
Ed -
Part of the explanation is that the hp increase is for SS/GT RWD, aftermarket heads, auto transmission combinations only. Not all the '86-'92 L98 engines meet those conditions. Some do and were not touched, and some have that 279 rating for FWD already, but at 275 for RWD. I do not always understand the reasoning in the distribution of different power ratings for the same engine, so here is another example.

Erik Jones 11-02-2017 12:00 PM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
Its a dish piston with replacement heads. Only 2 years with this spec, makes perfect sense that only this combo in a RWD gets hit. Thats why we did it. The standard "L98" that we ran last year and most guys run is a flat top engine.

Ed Wright 11-02-2017 04:06 PM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
Wow I have never had the heads off one of those with dished pistons. Guess I need to get out more.

Fred D Bartoli 11-02-2017 08:25 PM

Re: HP rating for this combo?
 
Wouldn't the new h.p. rating apply to any RWD/GT car. ? .If I were to put that combination in my 2000 Firebird would it be 270 or 279?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.