CLASS RACER FORUM

CLASS RACER FORUM (https://classracer.com/classforum/index.php)
-   Stock and Super Stock (https://classracer.com/classforum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   New AHFS (https://classracer.com/classforum/showthread.php?t=81154)

GUMP 12-21-2021 11:48 PM

New AHFS
 
So, who's going to test the new system first?

SSDiv6 12-22-2021 12:17 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GUMP (Post 654196)
So, who's going to test the new system first?

https://media1.giphy.com/media/LRVIib7uXMVe8/giphy.gif

Terry Cain 12-22-2021 06:56 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GUMP (Post 654196)
So, who's going to test the new system first?

You do it. I'll watch.

GUMP 12-22-2021 08:15 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry Cain (Post 654202)
You do it. I'll watch.

It looks like we will never see "mineshaft" again. Obviously, this is a drastic change. I can't see where it doesn't penalize hard work.

Someone from the NHRA needs to explain how this won't have the opposite effect on the data base.

These are performance based classes, where's the incentive to go fast? Lonnie??

South Georgia will be interesting.....

james schaechter 12-22-2021 09:03 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
There are different ways to make changes, positive ways that reward people with incentive and then there are the NHRA ways. I could see this as part of a solution in concert with more rewards for performance, but NHRA execs chose only the punitive side. Unfortunately, it appears that the bean counters still rule NHRA. No racer input needed.

Nmbr1GMfan 12-22-2021 09:24 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
"Data collected through the NHRA Live timing data base (including 660 foot elapsed time and 1000 foot elapsed time comparisons) will be utilized to verify if adjustments are needed".

SSDiv6 12-22-2021 09:29 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
Since the inception of the Stock and Super Stock classes, the classes have been always considered a performance class. I believe that in the old Farmer and subsequent days, although not perfect, the adjustment system was fair.

How about heads-up runs? The current rule does not exempt heads-ups runs. The only exception is as follows: "No runs made during exempt events, National Opens, test and tune, time trials, 1/8th mile events or races within a race (i.e. Jegs Allstar eliminations, Stock / Super Stock Combos or other races that are not part of a season long points championship) are included in any review."

My hope is that this new rule does not create a hazard due to top end accidents when fast guys slam on their brakes trying to slow down their cars!

GUMP 12-22-2021 09:44 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
Quote:

My hope is that this new rule does not create a hazard due to top end accidents when fast guys slam on their brakes trying to slow down their cars!
As they are planning to watch the incrementals, I can't see that as an option.

Whoever wrote these changes obviously didn't do their homework!

denbreeden 12-22-2021 10:08 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
NMCA is the place to be, granted it doesn’t help the racers out west.

Glenn Briglio 12-22-2021 10:35 AM

Re: New AHFS
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GUMP (Post 654204)
It looks like we will never see "mineshaft" again. Obviously, this is a drastic change. I can't see where it doesn't penalize hard work.

Someone from the NHRA needs to explain how this won't have the opposite effect on the data base.

These are performance based classes, where's the incentive to go fast? Lonnie??

South Georgia will be interesting.....

Indy will be mineshaft. After that doubtful


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.