CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Bruce Noland · 02-25-2009, 05:39 PM

Let's try to make this as simple as possible.

40 to 50 Horsepower is soft.

100 to 150 Horsepower is grossly under-factored.

Now that hunk of tin doesn't know who made it. But it is a 100 to150 Horsepower under-factored hunk of tin. Comparing the Firebird debacle to this CJ mugging is just plain lame.This car does not belong in regular Stock classes; it's an A-Rod car.

Believe me, we all know that nhra is too pathetic to do anything about this. Most of us are debating this issue because we feel like we are on the right side of history; no matter which side they are on. And some folks are posting snarkie posts because they don't have a car to race or haven't grown up yet or both.

02-25-2009, 05:39 PM	#4
Bruce Noland VIP Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,855 Likes: 83 Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts	Re: Mustang MPH? Let's try to make this as simple as possible. 40 to 50 Horsepower is soft. 100 to 150 Horsepower is grossly under-factored. Now that hunk of tin doesn't know who made it. But it is a 100 to150 Horsepower under-factored hunk of tin. Comparing the Firebird debacle to this CJ mugging is just plain lame.This car does not belong in regular Stock classes; it's an A-Rod car. Believe me, we all know that nhra is too pathetic to do anything about this. Most of us are debating this issue because we feel like we are on the right side of history; no matter which side they are on. And some folks are posting snarkie posts because they don't have a car to race or haven't grown up yet or both. __________________ Bruce Noland 1788 STK Last edited by Bruce Noland; 02-25-2009 at 08:37 PM.