CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Alan Roehrich · 03-29-2009, 11:36 AM

Ron, I watched several rounds of class last year. And I saw cars I know were fast and could win "take a knee" to avoid getting hit. The cars most likely to do this are the rarer cars with the capability to go 1.4 under or more.

NHRA is never going to be bothered with incrementals. If they were, they'd have used the suggested format racers offered, instead of what they've done.

I really wish there was an easy solution. Because the ONLY solution NHRA will be bothered with, if they will be bothered with a solution at all, is an easy one.

The problem with a CiC race in Stock is all combinations in a class are not equal, which is why the AHFS is necessary to begin with.

03-29-2009, 11:36 AM	#11
Alan Roehrich Veteran Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Murfreesboro TN Posts: 5,113 Likes: 1,571 Liked 1,822 Times in 413 Posts	Re: We need a new "instant" trigger! Ron, I watched several rounds of class last year. And I saw cars I know were fast and could win "take a knee" to avoid getting hit. The cars most likely to do this are the rarer cars with the capability to go 1.4 under or more. NHRA is never going to be bothered with incrementals. If they were, they'd have used the suggested format racers offered, instead of what they've done. I really wish there was an easy solution. Because the ONLY solution NHRA will be bothered with, if they will be bothered with a solution at all, is an easy one. The problem with a CiC race in Stock is all combinations in a class are not equal, which is why the AHFS is necessary to begin with. __________________ Alan Roehrich 212A G/S