Quote:
Originally Posted by bill dedman
Thanks, Lee; I appreciate the input.
The whole gist of this thread was based on the legality of some of the things that were allegedly done to this car. The implication was that they were things that were designed to make it fast.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating: is it fast?
The only way to know isto look at its numbers.
Is that not reason enough to apply a critical analysis to its performance in order to determine if there's any legitimate reason to even be LOOKING at what was done to it?
Jeesh... that would seem self-evident to me. If it's a mid-ten second car, who CARES if those mods were "legal" or not?
Doesn't appear that it is, though...runnin' really well for an A/SA car, it would seem.
Insofar as "enough is enough", nobody puts a gun to anybody's head and makes them read these posts; if you don't like it, don't read it. If something's on TV that I don't like, I turn it off...
|
I care if it's legal or not!!!!!!!!!!!
You are assume that all runs are heads up and that the only people who care about this car's legality would be cars of the same class. When in fact class racing is 95% bracket racing and the legality of the car in the other lane DOES matter. It doesn't matter if that car runs two seconds under or two seconds over.
You said, "Jeesh... that would seem self-evident to me. If it's a mid-ten second car, who CARES if those mods were "legal" or not?"...............................So, by your mentality, it would be ok for this ten second car to have a delay box? As long as it does not affect it's 1/4 mile peformance it should be legal?