CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

Dean Roberts · 04-16-2010, 10:18 AM

Greg, there is a huge difference in body work as the front-end parts are not at all interchangeable. Plus it's a totally different engine that was not available in the vehicle. GM submitted the paperwork to NHRA so the 98 models could be counted towards the manufacturers championship points and to have the latest car on track, even though it didn't have the engine that the public could buy the car with. And that's not a big deal to you?

So, you are saying because the performance is not an issue is it OK for NHRA to allow a car that never existed to run?

04-16-2010, 10:18 AM	#2
Dean Roberts Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 87 Likes: 0 Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Once again a bogus combination Greg, there is a huge difference in body work as the front-end parts are not at all interchangeable. Plus it's a totally different engine that was not available in the vehicle. GM submitted the paperwork to NHRA so the 98 models could be counted towards the manufacturers championship points and to have the latest car on track, even though it didn't have the engine that the public could buy the car with. And that's not a big deal to you? So, you are saying because the performance is not an issue is it OK for NHRA to allow a car that never existed to run?