[Chris "drooze" Wertman]

Alan, Ive asked this before (not of you) and everyone seemed to evade answering it.

Ok here are some "Facts"

Cars are not titled at the factory and you can depending on state even purchase one from a dealer WITHOUT having it titled.

So, next I can LEGALLY Title this vehicle in the State of Ohio.

So let me ask, If I do legally title this car and it is "street legal" and Emission Legal (Many counties in Ohio do NOT have emission requirments)

Then am I ok in your eyes ?

Hmm maybe there a business gambit for me, bring me your DP and I will get it titled and liscenced LEGALLY in the State of Ohio.

So say all 100 Dp owners do that ? Or at LEAST have the opportunity to do that, (we all know many racers whos cars arent or werent ever titled)

So say they have the ability or the opportunity to do that , and some do some dont just like the other Stockers.....

Then in your mind are the cars 100% fine or are your reasons not really all inclusive of the Title issues ?

I plan to do this, maybe before Norwalk I will....then I can post a copy of the title in the window for everyone to see....

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich

The bold text is exactly the problem. It changes the basic principle of Stock Eliminator that goes back decades. It creates a loophole you can drive Mike Edwards' Pro Stock car through. The "new" rule about what is/can be "accepted" in Stock is written in B.S. "legalese" so that NHRA can come in and run over every current participant any time they want (read: any time they can get paid off to do it).

And it has everything to do with "racing". Considering it allows NHRA to decide who has paid them (NHRA) enough money to secure an insurmountable advantage over their competition. Basically what they've created is an extortion racket. They can say to any OEM "if you want to get a killer ringer approved for Stock, pay up."