CLASS RACER FORUM - View Single Post

SS Engine Guy · 05-13-2010, 09:57 PM

Personally I really like the new stuff in race configuration. Like was said earlier, once you get the engine compartment layed out like you want it and all the added junk removed they aren't bad to work on at all. I have to agree with X-TECH though. If you took the 350/300 and put it at 250 hp. it would be one BAD and under-rated combo even if it is old technology. Same deal only in reverse. It all comes down to the factoring as was noted. Got to remember that the 350/300 was a mid level performance motor as offered. Not a tricked out L-88 or LT-1 with domed pistons, flat tappet cam, aluminum intake and a Holley.

05-13-2010, 09:57 PM	#18
SS Engine Guy Member Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: usa Posts: 256 Likes: 1 Liked 1 Time in 1 Post	Re: Lack Of S/SS Magazine Coverage Personally I really like the new stuff in race configuration. Like was said earlier, once you get the engine compartment layed out like you want it and all the added junk removed they aren't bad to work on at all. I have to agree with X-TECH though. If you took the 350/300 and put it at 250 hp. it would be one BAD and under-rated combo even if it is old technology. Same deal only in reverse. It all comes down to the factoring as was noted. Got to remember that the 350/300 was a mid level performance motor as offered. Not a tricked out L-88 or LT-1 with domed pistons, flat tappet cam, aluminum intake and a Holley.