Ed, how do you construe my ONE contention (a disagreement with Terry about the status of this much-modified car with a motor that is NOTHING LIKE its original configuration) as "pissing and whining?"
If somebody hung you with a new rope, you'd probably complain about that.
I HOPE that one of these days, Ken makes you an "honorary moderator" so your comments will carry some weight; it must be very frustrating to look back and see no posse following, time after time.
I have NO PROBLEM with that '67 GT 500 as it sits; it is 100-percent class-legal, and I congratulated Ken on his well-deserved win several times; I'm GLAD he won in that car.
My only comment was that in its present state of tune, with literally NOTHING on the engine that is original, I think it's a real stretch to call it an "old muscle car. The OEM '67 Shelby GT 500s could not fall out of a tree; Ken's car is a rocket...
Now, where's the pissing and whining???
PS #1 There's no "D" in congratulatory
PS #2 RE: "going off on a tandem."
A Tandem? I don't even own a single-seat bicycle, much less a two-seater.... Did you mean "going off on a 'tangent'????
Bill (not educated anywhere near "NEW YAWK...")
Gee, ED; I didn't realize how much I've missed you......
