[Paul Ceasrine]

Ozzie,
I'm not sure, but I think the 69' AMX was lighter than the 68' AMX.
Not sure why? I thought they were the same and one?
I'll check, but if your correct, than in 69', the 69' AMX 390/315HP ran in E/Stock and the 68' AMX 390/315HP ran in F/Stock.
PC

The guidelines list the 69' AMX 390/315HP at #3048 lbs. (-115 lbs.) lighter than the 68' AMX 390/315HP, so it would be classed one class lower.
Though the 69' AMX 343/280HP and 290/225HP cars are listed with almost the exact weight. I'm lost!
The S/S car is also listed at #3048 lbs.
There has to be some error.. As for other classificatiions, I know for a fact that we ran against a 68' or 69' Javelin SST in 1969, in K/S (12.50-12.99 wt/hp)
Ran against him the whole summer.
The current weight/hp factors don't compute, but I'll figure it out.