View Single Post
Old 07-04-2010, 08:18 AM   #37
Billy Nees
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 3,587
Liked 7,683 Times in 1,731 Posts
Default Re: Why did nhra change the cam and valve spring rule in 1985?

The trouble with setting a specific # for valve springs in this day and age is that the cam manufacturers are building cams that a flat tappet lifter just can't follow even with the best springs! I believe that some of the really sharp Stocker engine builders are actually getting away from "square" cams and going back to "softer" lobes at least on the exhaust as they're finding they're "cleaning up" the intake charge by not bouncing the exhaust valve around on the seat. Think about what the "harmonics" of that exhaust valve bouncing on the seat is doing to the intake charge not to mention the cylinder pressure.
Another good reason for "softening" the lobe is simply to use less spring. Heavy springs just "tie up" horsepower that can't be used to accelerate the vehicle.
I guess where I'm going with this is that as much as I'd like to see a "valve spring spec" rule put in the book it would make a lot of cams in use today unuseable and I don't forsee any of todays Stocker engine builders or cam manufacturers lobbying for a rule that will make their stuff unuseable.
But these are just the ramblings of a bored, crazy old fool living on a hill in Pennsylvania.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS

I'm not spending 100K to win 2K
Billy Nees is offline   Reply With Quote