Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Noland
Yes, I am a member of a group of people who are attempting to reverse some of nhra's more egregious actions. Like nhra taking away our membership rights. Sitting on our hands is not an option for us. We don't buy this mighty nhra nonsense.
There are many ways to resolve problems here in the good old US of A. Like seeking assistance from government agencies that have jurisdiciton over these organizations. There is no need to file law suits, but we would win if we decided to go that route. nhra does have a pretty bad record when it comes to major law suits. The Pro Stock Truck racers scared nhra so badly that it refused to profide any court ordered documentation about itself and opted to make a large payment to the PST racers instead. The spanking by the PST racers proved that nhra has many problems when it comes to litigation. And believe me it was a real down home spanking!
It's nice to know that your brand loyalty is reserved for AMX. Many people thought you had been fooled into believing that nhra was really trying to help the members.
|
Bruce,
Quit putting words into my statements. I did not say my brand loyalty was to the AMC or AMX. I took your statement and put a "LOL" behind it and stated having an AMX carried no advantages.
And yes, for the record, I do believe NHRA will do what's right to preserve the class (and help the members) as I see no value in chasing off 95% of the members (I'm using 95% as an arbitrary figure for discussion as I have no way of knowing how many would leave the sport) and I do not believe NHRA has a viable future as a Pro only venue.
So if some believe I've been fooled, that's their opinion and they are entitled to it.