View Single Post
Old 09-18-2010, 02:32 PM   #9
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,124
Likes: 1,581
Liked 1,874 Times in 422 Posts
Default Re: TH 400 vs 350 vs 200 metric

The 350 will cost less, and may be slightly faster. The low gear difference between the 350 (2.52) and the 400 (2.48) is negligible. I don't think I'd bother with a 2.75 low in your car. I'd be more inclined to buy the best converter possible. Of course, you'll be moving your crossmember and changing your driveshaft to accommodate a 350. The converter is the same, but your stall will go down when you put a converter that has been in front of a heavy 400 in front of a light 350. Maybe as much as 200-300 RPM.

I don't think you can make enough power or spin enough RPM to make reliability an issue with the bottom end of an Olds in Stock if it is well built. The stock F0 and F1 block is good to 600+ and 7000RPM (and that's 7000RPM while making good power, not 7000RPM going through the lights well after peak HP has come and gone). The stock cast crank will handle that as well, properly prepared.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is online now   Reply With Quote